Does Trey Lance have a future at QB? Maybe, but think he legit could compete for RB1 in Oxnard

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
4,303
Dang. Almost 12 hours ago, I replied to two comments that... to the posters' credit... squarely, authentically addressed the assertion of the OP.

Nothing since. About Lance, yes, but the OP of course was more specific than just about Lance.

I'm well aware that one shouldn't anticipate these kinds of out-loud thought experiments are going to be much more than chum for the contrarians. I'm fine with that. But at least be contrarian about what the thread is about. Not too much to ask.
 

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
4,303
Not playing him in those blowouts last season was incredibly stupid.
Wasn't active.

I was one of the few here about halfway into the season (and thus, Lance having had a chance to absorb some of the offense) advocating for the idea of making Lance your active gameday #2 QB for just that purpose... and/but in the event of long-term injury to Dak, continuing to consider Rush to be your long-term #2 QB. So, I don't know that I'd go so far as to say "incredibly stupid," but I do feel like it possibly was an example of foreclosing to conventional wisdom w/o giving it more extensive thought.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
72,416
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Trey Lance is a great athlete. Size, arm strength, mobility. THAT is what made him an intriguing prospect for the NFL. But his QB credentials were not as impressive.

Coming out of HS, many colleges that were seriously interested in him wanted him to play safety. The only semi-“name” program that was interested in him as a QB was North Dakota State - a good FCS school but certainly not power 5 competition. He played pretty well but of course he wasn’t playing Alabama or Ohio State. Most of the athletes he competed against in college will never play a down of NFL football.

For various reasons TL only had less than 20 starts as a college QB, which is an indicator of his level of development at the time he was drafted. And he was barely 21. Looking back at his draft in 2021, it’s hard to believe the niners moved up to draft a kid who had so little in terms of experience and quality of opponents.

Could Trey Lance’s athleticism translate to RB? IMO not a chance. Although he has size and quickness, he does not possess great overall speed and ability to make cuts. Today’s NFL RBs also have to be able to pick up blitzers and pass rushers who are bigger and I can’t see him making that kind of learning leap.

Trey Lance has always been a long shot. A roll of the dice. The people acting like he’s Dak’s successor either haven't studied him or are just hoping he is because they are tired of Dak. I’m not opposed to moving on from Dak but as a Cowboys fan who is neither a “Dak hater” or “Dak apologist”, I would like the next starting QB to have a lot more going for them than Trey Lance.

Since last August I have always seen the Lance trade as completely mystifying. Then I remember who’s running this organization.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,503
Reaction score
6,437
... if given that opportunity.

Which he won't be, because he'll be getting QB snaps. I get it.

When I watch this kid play snap after snap after snap on YouTube... all of his NDSU plays, all of his 49ers plays... I come away believing it's arguable that he could be someone's QB#1 after giving some time to mature and develop.

Maybe.

Not a big fan of his throwing motion--seems a little loose, though no one's asked me to be their HS QB coach, let alone an NFL one, so what do I know. Seems to have some long ball touch, actually, yet on shorter throws, a common theme seems to be that he's not precise consistently, and his receivers too often have to adjust to his passes in a way that limits their YAC. Will be interesting to see where his strengths and weaknesses lie after this preseason.

But in a parallel universe where Trey Lance is given the chance to be #1 RB in DAL?

I'm not going to say he absolutely would win that camp position battle, but I'm definitely persuaded he's make it a real contest. Nah, he's not going to break ankles the way that Pollard could, and probably not even to the degree that Rico can. But he's got two things, nay three, going for him:

(1) He may not make defenders miss by grasping for air, but he has that same skill that Emmitt had, that he has just a little bit of instinctive wiggle that regularly keeps defenders from hitting him square, and so they end up able to make some contact, but routinely bounce off.

(2) Even if you get your hands on him, he's just damn tough to bring down unless you've got help.

(3) If he's allowed to get to fifth gear with open field in front of him, you better hope you have a CB that has angle so he can run him down... but otherwise forget it... he's one of the fastest in the NFL

Just my opinion, but an informed one, having spent a lot of time over the last couple of days watching the tape.
More realistically he could be our leading RB playing QB. If he started he could run for 50 yards a game and end up with 800 yards.
 

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
4,303
Coming out of HS, many colleges that were seriously interested in him wanted him to play safety. The only semi-“name” program that was interested in him as a QB was North Dakota State - a good FCS school but certainly not power 5 competition. He played pretty well but of course he wasn’t playing Alabama or Ohio State. Most of the athletes he competed against in college will never play a down of NFL football.
I'm aware that he went to NDSU because they were the only ones willing to commit to giving him a shot at QB. But that's all I'm aware of, and a quick survey of recruiting sites seems to indicate he didn't even go on any official visits. Did he himself say that he was told he would play safety? Because I'd heard nothing that specific. I'm only aware that his HS coach said he always thought TL's position in college would be RB because his legs were his best attribute.

I doubt you intended it as a shot, but NDSU, let's give them credit, is more than just "a good FCS school." They are the irrefutable most accomplished FCS program ever. "Certainly not power 5 competition" is a true statement. But what a lot of people miss is that there are ways to run statistical comparisons even between FBS and FCS teams. The Sagarin Ratings have been published for decades, and there are others who have done similar work.

For 2019, Lance's big year at NDSU, only 24 members of autonomous conferences rated higher than NDSU, and only 6 members of non-autonomous conferences. (Personal pet peeve... we call them "power" conferences, when in fact, only a handful of any given conference given that label actually plot out statistically better than the best "group of" conferences... complete ESPN marketing label that unfortunately stuck decades ago, making the pursuit of due regard for the Boise States of the world undeservingly more difficult.) https://sagarin.usatoday.com/2019-2/2019-2/college-football-team-ratings-2019/

Your point is well taken on this, too, but most of the athletes that any NFL player played against in college... those from FBS autonomous conference members, too... will never play a down of NFL football. Perhaps this is why there are so many NFL (and NBA) busts even among those who go on the first and second day. It's just hard to assess these guys until you get them into an NFL camp.

Well, that, and the fact that these are kids transitioning into becoming adults. There's so much going on physically and cognitively and emotionally/psychologically and socially.

he does not possess great overall speed and ability to make cuts.
Speed?

I don't know why people don't seem to be all that aware of this, but they don't.

https://www.nfl.com/news/2021-nfl-d...n-40-at-pro-day-leaning-on-tape-to-show-speed

2024-07-06_16-03-50.png.288f820748043a0c619f48fdde9100e4.png



Nothing more needs to be said until he gets old enough that we start having reason to believe he's lost a step. Lance is fast. He just is. Now, he may take some time getting to 5th gear--I can't speak to that. But his top speed is exceptional.

Ability to make cuts, we agree, if by that you mean he's not going to make a lot of guys miss. I said as much earlier in the thread. But what he does possess, as I said above, is he has an Emmitt Smith-like instinct to wiggle just enough that defenders rarely actually meet him square... and because of his size and strength, the first guy doesn't get him to the ground, and often rather just bounces off him. I've watched every single run he had at NDSU, every run he's had in SF. Watch and see if you don't end up with the same conclusion.

There are other starting-caliber RBs in the NFL who have these same traits as TL.

Today’s NFL RBs also have to be able to pick up blitzers and pass rushers who are bigger and I can’t see him making that kind of learning leap.
Until I see a guy do it, I'm inclined to think he probably cannot do it at an NFL level. So, I'll give you this one, with the caveat that it's not a question of size... TL put in a room of RBs you respect as good pass protectors would blend in just fine. He has the measurables, but I'm a skeptic--like I'd be a skeptic about anyone--that he would prove to be a good pass protection guy.


Could Trey Lance’s athleticism translate to RB? IMO not a chance.
Clearly, I disagree. Based on all I've watched, it could. Could. We'll never know, but it's the off-season of the off-season, so it has been for me a cool thought experiment worth discussing.

Appreciate you being one of the limited number in the thread who spoke to the actual precise topic of the OP. Thx.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,970
Reaction score
50,823
Was it done intentionally to avoid controversy?
Since we've done this incessantly in the past, I'd conclude that it's just what we do because we have such extreme incompetence at GM. We've never played young players to see what they could do, we've always just played vets, even in situations where the game was lost/won. Remember when we cut extremely competent Matt Moore to keep Brad Johnson, even though Brad's arm was shot and he could barely throw it past the LOS?
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
16,172
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Not playing him in those blowouts last season was incredibly stupid.
It depends if you wanna keep dak or not. :p

I actually think Dak played in too many blowouts. Give those other QBs valuable playing time and protect him.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,863
Reaction score
10,912
... if given that opportunity.

Which he won't be, because he'll be getting QB snaps. I get it.

When I watch this kid play snap after snap after snap on YouTube... all of his NDSU plays, all of his 49ers plays... I come away believing it's arguable that he could be someone's QB#1 after giving some time to mature and develop.

Maybe.

Not a big fan of his throwing motion--seems a little loose, though no one's asked me to be their HS QB coach, let alone an NFL one, so what do I know. Seems to have some long ball touch, actually, yet on shorter throws, a common theme seems to be that he's not precise consistently, and his receivers too often have to adjust to his passes in a way that limits their YAC. Will be interesting to see where his strengths and weaknesses lie after this preseason.

But in a parallel universe where Trey Lance is given the chance to be #1 RB in DAL?

I'm not going to say he absolutely would win that camp position battle, but I'm definitely persuaded he's make it a real contest. Nah, he's not going to break ankles the way that Pollard could, and probably not even to the degree that Rico can. But he's got two things, nay three, going for him:

(1) He may not make defenders miss by grasping for air, but he has that same skill that Emmitt had, that he has just a little bit of instinctive wiggle that regularly keeps defenders from hitting him square, and so they end up able to make some contact, but routinely bounce off.

(2) Even if you get your hands on him, he's just damn tough to bring down unless you've got help.

(3) If he's allowed to get to fifth gear with open field in front of him, you better hope you have a CB that has angle so he can run him down... but otherwise forget it... he's one of the fastest in the NFL

Just my opinion, but an informed one, having spent a lot of time over the last couple of days watching the tape.
wth is this mush? Dak just came off a season where he was number 2 in MVP voting, and you think this kid who has STUNK when he was playing will compete with him? Then you start talking about him playing RB? Are you Lance's mother?
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
16,172
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Trey Lance is a great athlete. Size, arm strength, mobility. THAT is what made him an intriguing prospect for the NFL. But his QB credentials were not as impressive.

Coming out of HS, many colleges that were seriously interested in him wanted him to play safety. The only semi-“name” program that was interested in him as a QB was North Dakota State - a good FCS school but certainly not power 5 competition. He played pretty well but of course he wasn’t playing Alabama or Ohio State. Most of the athletes he competed against in college will never play a down of NFL football.

For various reasons TL only had less than 20 starts as a college QB, which is an indicator of his level of development at the time he was drafted. And he was barely 21. Looking back at his draft in 2021, it’s hard to believe the niners moved up to draft a kid who had so little in terms of experience and quality of opponents.

Could Trey Lance’s athleticism translate to RB? IMO not a chance. Although he has size and quickness, he does not possess great overall speed and ability to make cuts. Today’s NFL RBs also have to be able to pick up blitzers and pass rushers who are bigger and I can’t see him making that kind of learning leap.

Trey Lance has always been a long shot. A roll of the dice. The people acting like he’s Dak’s successor either haven't studied him or are just hoping he is because they are tired of Dak. I’m not opposed to moving on from Dak but as a Cowboys fan who is neither a “Dak hater” or “Dak apologist”, I would like the next starting QB to have a lot more going for them than Trey Lance.

Since last August I have always seen the Lance trade as completely mystifying. Then I remember who’s running this organization.
I would like to...for ONCE since Troy...not gamble OR get lucky at QB. Is it too much to ask to be serious about it?
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
16,172
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
wth is this mush? Dak just came off a season where he was number 2 in MVP voting, and you think this kid who has STUNK when he was playing will compete with him? Then you start talking about him playing RB? Are you Lance's mother?
#2 in voting? Without receiving a single 1st place vote?

I mean...he had a great regular season no doubt. But nobody remembers an MVP let alone 3rd place.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,970
Reaction score
50,823
It depends if you wanna keep dak or not. :p

I actually think Dak played in too many blowouts. Give those other QBs valuable playing time and protect him.
I think you've misread. We needed to play Trance a lot in blowouts just to see what he had, and we didn't. Played Rush instead for no reason. Dak should've played less instead of ringing up meaningless stats.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,928
Reaction score
19,484
... if given that opportunity.

Which he won't be, because he'll be getting QB snaps. I get it.

When I watch this kid play snap after snap after snap on YouTube... all of his NDSU plays, all of his 49ers plays... I come away believing it's arguable that he could be someone's QB#1 after giving some time to mature and develop.

Maybe.

Not a big fan of his throwing motion--seems a little loose, though no one's asked me to be their HS QB coach, let alone an NFL one, so what do I know. Seems to have some long ball touch, actually, yet on shorter throws, a common theme seems to be that he's not precise consistently, and his receivers too often have to adjust to his passes in a way that limits their YAC. Will be interesting to see where his strengths and weaknesses lie after this preseason.

But in a parallel universe where Trey Lance is given the chance to be #1 RB in DAL?

I'm not going to say he absolutely would win that camp position battle, but I'm definitely persuaded he's make it a real contest. Nah, he's not going to break ankles the way that Pollard could, and probably not even to the degree that Rico can. But he's got two things, nay three, going for him:

(1) He may not make defenders miss by grasping for air, but he has that same skill that Emmitt had, that he has just a little bit of instinctive wiggle that regularly keeps defenders from hitting him square, and so they end up able to make some contact, but routinely bounce off.

(2) Even if you get your hands on him, he's just damn tough to bring down unless you've got help.

(3) If he's allowed to get to fifth gear with open field in front of him, you better hope you have a CB that has angle so he can run him down... but otherwise forget it... he's one of the fastest in the NFL

Just my opinion, but an informed one, having spent a lot of time over the last couple of days watching the tape.
:facepalm: :huh:
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
80,585
Reaction score
101,226
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
From the OP:
"Not a big fan of his throwing motion--seems a little loose, though no one's asked me to be their HS QB coach, let alone an NFL one, so what do I know. Seems to have some long ball touch, actually, yet on shorter throws, a common theme seems to be that he's not precise consistently, and his receivers too often have to adjust to his passes in a way that limits their YAC. Will be interesting to see where his strengths and weaknesses lie after this preseason."

How do we know the WR's were not off on their routes? Was it the play itself and no matter what, there was not much room to run for YAC.
This also sounds familiar to what happens now. But is it the routes or the throws. Most likely both at different times. Maybe the throw was adjusted because the WR was not as precise as he should have been. These are most likely not top WR prospects.
A lot to factor in.

Do you have a link to the video? I would like to view it as well.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,863
Reaction score
10,912
#2 in voting? Without receiving a single 1st place vote?

I mean...he had a great regular season no doubt. But nobody remembers an MVP let alone 3rd place.
nobody remembers a 1st rd bust ..... oh wait, yea we do. We are littered with 1st rd bust QBs throughout the NFL. Add Lance to the list.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,970
Reaction score
50,823
Wasn't active.

I was one of the few here about halfway into the season (and thus, Lance having had a chance to absorb some of the offense) advocating for the idea of making Lance your active gameday #2 QB for just that purpose... and/but in the event of long-term injury to Dak, continuing to consider Rush to be your long-term #2 QB. So, I don't know that I'd go so far as to say "incredibly stupid," but I do feel like it possibly was an example of foreclosing to conventional wisdom w/o giving it more extensive thought.
Which is even more stupid.

Hey, we traded for him, he's ours. Doesn't matter anymore whether we agree w/ it or not. Now, you play him both to see what he can do and to give him more experience.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,863
Reaction score
10,912
I would like to...for ONCE since Troy...not gamble OR get lucky at QB. Is it too much to ask to be serious about it?
If only we were more serious, like the Jets. I mean, they have probably used 10 1st rd picks on QBs in my lifetime...... I bet their fans would wish they were lucky.
 
Top