I'd definutely take him over Tolbert, Fehoko and Houston.
But first there's the financial aspect which makes acquisition doubtful and then there's the newly found run game philosophy to deal with.
I mean more specifically...
With the money tied up in Cooks and Gallup, Lamb on a trying to get WR1 money contract year and then, Ced as the 4th option, why tie up so much money in the WR room and then when are they gonna run the ball?
I sense contradiction in all these offseason run game speeches.
It's prolly just me.
Heck, while we're at it it makes sense to draft another tight end in the first so we can "run the damn ball" too said the HC who in 30 years of coaching has NEVER been known for dynamic run game principles.
Makes perfect sense.