Killerinstinct
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,013
- Reaction score
- 5,870
IMO likely with the way he plays. Thats why if Treadwell is the guy (as I said doubtful) take him because they dont have anything else close to a one. I think Josh Gordon has as a good a chance to be here as JFB by the way. Gordon when he plays is a beast.
The biggest weakness imo on this team is cb. Hargreaves makes too much sense to me. In a trade back I can see Dallas going for Elliot or treadwell
Dallas wont touch gordon, i actually dont even think they would touch Manziel. If theres a FA QB who has the most chance to be in Dallas i think its Kaepernick
The biggest weakness on this team is safety. Otherwise all you have to do is leave Byron Jones at corner and we are gold. Moving Jones to safety and adding Hargreaves addresses both positions. That's why it makes sense. I would rather have Jones at corner though. Adding someone like Jaylon Smith in a small trade back and then getting Bush in the second would make me happy.
Jones had already been starting at FS only reason he was moved back to CB was because Claiborne got hurt. Jones is just a better player at FS then CB
Has a rep for being lazy, will want a lot of money, and if he is here, I dont see Wilson fixing him.
So unless I'm missing something there's nothing in that article that says the Brown's GM doesn't like Manziel.
Pettine acknowledged he might not be around but doesn't specify why so unless you can do better than that your just speculating.
However either way if Manziel shows enough in these last few games then he stays a Brown and if he doesn't then he's not good enough for what Dallas needs at the QB position especially with all the media circus that he would bring.
A GM is never going to come right out and say he doesnt like a certain player. I think it can be inferred that is the case based on several things but what the Browns think is irrelevant to me other than It could provide an opportunity to not only add a QB that can fill in for Romo when he is out but win some of these close games we have been losing. AND possibly be the long term answer for life after Romo. AND do so without requiring a premium pick. AND be fun as hell to watch.
Get the man out of Cleveland and put him in Dallas close to his family and with the usual efforts Dallas makes with a high profile player that needs a little babysitting and this is a formula for success. IMO
People should get that QB dream out of your heads. This team isnt moving on from Romo any time soon. Id rather have a good backup at this point instead of a player who dallas would draft high only to sit and not help this team win.
I'd rather have Hargreaves and let jones play Fs exclusively
Again it's speculation on your part and as for needing a little babysitting, do you remember how well they did with Packman Jones or more recently Joseph Randle?
If I was you I'd take another look at your formula.
Pacman Jones is still in the league and possibly could start for us right now. Maybe you should look at your formula. Manziel has talent and there is a reason why he was a top talent on Dallas's board. It is one thing to pass on him to grab Martin which was needed to solidify the line. There is no way Jerry passes on him again if available.
Joseph Randle is not Manziel. Not even close.
Not sure what this means. Seems they are pretty similar. Middling NFL talents who can control themselves off the field.
Again it's speculation on your part and as for needing a little babysitting, do you remember how well they did with Packman Jones or more recently Joseph Randle?
If I was you I'd take another look at your formula.
Manziel is already pretty good playing on a crappy team and only getting a few starts. If given a chance with the talent Dallas has on offense he can prosper.
Let's put it this way, if Manziel was cut today would he still be available in a week?.
Randle is still out there last I checked. I'm surprise you can't see the difference between the two players.