Zman5
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,155
- Reaction score
- 20,617
Find the rules in the thread, young man.
I did young man. It looks like Kece reengages beyond the 1 yard line. Go get some glasses.
Find the rules in the thread, young man.
So how do we stop it. We’ve struggled against it against the rams in the past… also with Kyler Murray. Then there was the 49er game last year.
My guess is do more of what we did when Micah went out in coverage. Drop him back… dont dictate what your doing.
or have Micah rush but up the middle… guard center. So he can play more downhill.
problem is our run d up the middle isn’t as great so we’re susceptible to runs there. Gotta figure something out going forward.
You added that picture after I had already started to respond but it shows all I said based on video. The LT and RT have their feet on the 6. They're good. The LG is still engaged with Parsons after contacting him within 1 yard of the LOS, not the 5. The RG is looking back because he became disengaged from his original block more than 1 yard downfield, so he has to stop. He did that and turned around to watch the pass. Kelce is still engaged in his original block and has turned Bohanan around but is clearly still engaged.
What is the problem here?
Have Micah light up the QB few times instead of hesitating. They'll stop running it again.
The guards clearly come off their initial blocks and climb north to engage again near the 5 yard line. Those are not initial engagements at the LOS, I don’t know how you’re not seeing that.
The guards clearly come off their initial blocks and climb north to engage again near the 5 yard line. Those are not initial engagements at the LOS, I don’t know how you’re not seeing that.
Because he’s a blind referee apologist
Has been for a long time
That is what they would have done back in the 70s-90s........Have Micah light up the QB few times instead of hesitating. They'll stop running it again.
You're clearly not understanding the rule. The rules state:
So who cares if they aren't the initial blocks? The LG re-engaged with Parsons within 1 yard of the LOS (you haven't addressed this correction). The RG was pushed by his own RT and crashed into Kelce/Bohanan (which is not a new block if you're pushed into a guy) but he stops and turns around because the rules say he has to.
- you can't move more than 1 yard downfield and block nobody
- you can't block someone more than 1 yard downfield as an initial block
- you can't block someone within 1 yard as an initial block and then disengage and make another block more than 1 yard downfield
- you can't disengage from a block more than 1 yard downfield and keep moving forward
So I'm not sure what you're trying to show from a still picture that can only be determined by motion you have to see unfold (like holding or PI). Even the grainy Twitter video isn't showing what you say it shows.
(c) after losing contact with an opponent more than one yard beyond the line of scrimmage, he continues to move toward his opponent’s goal line.
Both Guards clearly do this. The ball is snapped at the 7 and you can clearly see the left guard climb north to meet Parsons at the 5.
I’m sure you’d also find ways to convince yourself this wasn’t ineligible man downfield either on the Brown TD. The Guard climbs north and engages Barr 2 yards past the line of scrimmage. Rewatch the game, they did this all night. Their guards climb upfield to our Linebackers on these pass plays well beyond 1 yard from the LOS. It’s bull**** and the NFL needs to tighten this up since they’re exploiting this so heavily.
The rule is put in place so tackles don't look like TEs going out for passes. It looks like all the Eagles are engaged in blocks and not running. Hypothetically if the DLine steps back 2 yards are you saying the OLine can't go block them? It seems fair and legal to me. Does #78 look like he's trying to confuse the D as being a receiver and running downfield? I'm not trying to defend the Eagles but you can't expect an unblocked G to not try and block. I don't know but it seems legit. What if our LT pancakes a DE and pushes him back more then a yard. Would they call that illegal man downfield?
Per rule, it's legal as long as you maintain your initial block. It looks to me Kelce loses his block but has his hands on the defender then reengages. That isn't maintaining his initial block.
I’ve noticed this in previous weeks and it was happening over and over last night. Their OL will come off the ball 3-4 yards run blocking essentially signaling to the defense it’s a run play. Hurts will wait until the linebackers and safeties are forced to commit to honoring those keys, and then throw the ball down field. This is completely illegal and the eagles have been exploiting this all season in their RPO game. On the RPO the decision for the quarterback to pass downfield requires him to make that decision immediately, it is impossible for him to hold onto the ball and start rolling out because by that time the lineman are 3-4 yards downfield… as far as they’re concerned they’re just blocking this up like a run play! Hurts does this constantly and it never gets called, the referees are allowing him WAY too much extended time for the run/pass option to be available to him.
Enforce the damn rules of the game!
There is an OL 3 yards downfield that is not blocking anyone...LOL. You don't "lose your block" if you always have your hands on a guy the entire time and are driving him forward the entire time like Kelce was doing. That's called "blocking." He even turned Bohanan around while blocking him 4 yards downfield. Who needs glasses again? Oh wait, you do have them. They're called fan glasses.
DWare started doing that back in the day.This will stop when a team finally says screw it and tees off on Hurts at the mesh point. It’s completely legal to obliterate the QB at that point, and they’ll sacrifice a few runs to either injure him or get them to stop running it.
It’s what happened to RG3 and it quickly wore him down
There is an OL 3 yards downfield that is not blocking anyone...