SkinsFan26 said:
Yeah, but the Skins beat Dallas twice last year and addressed their weak points as well.
Not all that well, they didn't... they made some questionable moves... and they certainly haven't addressed ALL of their weak points... they remain bad when it comes to offensive line depth, they have serious depth issues in their secondary, and if they have to play a backup QB for any length of time, they're screwed...
BTW, Dallas' O-line still sucks.
That's just a BS thing to say, the kind of thing I'd expect from a troll... the Boys' offensive line was good enough last year to help the Boys rank just behind the Skins in total offense last year... this might be understandable if the Boys had a significant advantage in the offensive skill position players, but I don't think you'd agree that was the case, would you?? So, if the line "sucks", like you said, how do you explain the Skins' offensve averaging just FIVE YARDS more than the Cowboys did last year??
And since then, we've added Kyle Kosier and Jason Fabini, you guys have added Tyson Walter and Mike Pucillo... clear advantage, Cowboys...
If we're talking starters alone here, I like yours a little better... let me repeat that, a LITTLE better... but if we're talking the entire unit, backups included, well, your backups really DO suck... there isn't one of them who could make the Cowboys' 53 man roster...
I don't think that weakness has been addressed sufficiently yet.
The key word there is "yet"... got lots of cap room left, got high draft picks (and one of them will certainly be used on an OL, Jerry has said as much)...
And as I've said repeatedly, I don't think the Skins' weakness on the offensive line has been addressed sufficiently yet, either...