Yeah but they made you look right for the better part of 20 years.
So excuse me if I'm not interested in any lessons from the crowd who simply pick the Cowboys every week of every year.
Threads like these and call out's are lame. "Homers" want the "realists" to eat crow, yet some folks have been calling for for help along the lines for years. Some folks have claimed time and time again that the game is built (and won) along the lines. Some folks have been harping on running the ball more, pounding the rock ans staying committed to the run (especially with a lead). We even had threads in the past, supported by many "homers," that running the ball does not lead to wins. Of course, they took this position because they support everything our pass happy HC does without question; they're sheep. If anyone should eat crow, it should be the folks who supported every move like moving up for a CB when we needed help along the lines.
You and others have been harping on the line for years. This is what you get when you get solid O-line play and put the big uglies in front of your franchise QB. These are the results you get when a fresh face comes in and gives the offense a new look and commits to the running game. Oh, and the top 10 CB we moved up for (a move which all the homers supported even though they preached OL all off-season) is out for the year and we're winning with solid D-line play which is pressuring the QB and stopping the run (which is the most surprising thing for me). Yes, some folks should feel vindicated but it's not necessarily the "homers," but rather those folks who were ridiculed for years for talking about the importance of the lines and marginalizing the CB position as a secondary need.
I'm still waiting for someone to start a thread and say RS (and others) were right and I'll eat my crow.