Teague31
Defender of the Star
- Messages
- 18,220
- Reaction score
- 22,837
I'll bet Elliot never gets 1800+ yards rushing like Murray did.
I bet Zeke never fumbles away a playoff game
I'll bet Elliot never gets 1800+ yards rushing like Murray did.
The CBA actually states that their salaries are NOT slotted. They only seem to be slotted because in 2011, the NFLPA accidentally sent the rookie pool allotments for every draft pick to all of the agents, so the NFL sent them to the teams. The CBA says those allotments are supposed to be kept confidential. Since then, almost all rookie contracts have been done using those allotments to determine the dollar figures, but they don't HAVE to be done that way, and some contracts aren't. Teams can still sign players for more or less than their allotment, if they want (and if the players agree to them), as long as the team has room under its total rookie pool and its total limit for rookie contract values.
IF that is the case then I imagine some guy trying to get a larger proportion would be treated like a pariah.
And they ate a ton of dead money in the process.
Money that could be used now or in the future to sign cornerstone players.
I bet Zeke never fumbles away a playoff game
Maybe, but some guys do get a little more, and some guys get a little less.
Agreed.
And the next "best thing" they do will be to realize that the game needs a true minor league system and finally do it right.
I think it would be profitable to. People would go see the games. Open franchises in Ohio/Pa/Texas/ Florida/Cali..some state in the Midwest. Could even "test" markets by putting the teams in different mid-sized cities...I don't know, I actually think it would make money.....
no more PS stuff...
ohh the wear and tear argument......
AP had lots of wear and tear before last year.....
I am on the EE Train,,,,
But the guy hasn't played a down in the NFL yet....
Murray broke records, Like all time singlr season rushing record....in the history of the Dallas Cowboys!!!!....He was proven. But hey, that's just not going to cut it.
You see this and that, and the experts and pundits, they all say this. ummmhummm.
But hey "Well be fine at RB, its an overvalued position and with this line, Charlie chicken face could run behind it.....", "Besides, it has nothing to do with the RB position, its all about Passing Efficiency"....
If we had Murray, maybe we get Ramsey?
I don't know.,.. Expensive mistake indeed.....But at least they addressed it, And because they did address it, I am thinking playoffs...
No kidding!
This Cowboys rushing attack had better take the league by storm and be the next big thing to justify the investments made in it.
I'm hoping that we're starting a new league trend rather than trying to imitate what someone else is doing.
Get help on Defense that needs a lot of help...or sign a RB when we'd be able to run the ball regardless and rushing efficiency very marginally increases your likelihood of winning.
This isn't a trick question. One answer is superior to the other.
In Peter King's article he said Garret spent 7 hours the day before the draft and watched every snap of both Ramsey and Zeke. He liked Ramsey but LOVED Zeke and what he brings to the team.
Garrett would tell you to shut the hell up with this "Zeke only marginally increases the team's chances to win"
Of course Garrett could just be an idiot head coach that has no clue what he is doing......always a possibility
I will say for all the whining about signing bad contracts Philly got out of two them very easily this year and even moved up in the draft twice....it was part of how they were able to go get up and get Wentz....almost all contracts are 2-3 years deals anymore, unless the player performs....the last 2 years of Dez' deal are only for 25m.....
An offensive head coach loved an offensive playmaker more than a defensive player.
No way!
I'll bet Elliot never gets 1800+ yards rushing like Murray did.
Teams are trying to imitate us...
Football is still football and the 90's SB is all the proof RE what a great line along with a great RB is capable of...
Remember this: EVERYONE belied the D would be total garbage in 2014, but they actually played well.. So' which defense would you prefer - the 2014 or the 2016, thus far?
I'll take this years D, and our O will be better than 2014 for obvious reasons..
Beeeeelieeeeeve..
First, Dude, Murry was an aging and injury prone RB who finally played most the games but just had 450 carries..
We knew that 2014 drove I him into the ground, and so we moved on.
Second, Zeke is nearly infinity time better than Murray in terms of current and future potential. Zeke is special; Murray is slow, runs to darkness, and leaves meat on the bone - we all know it's true..
Lastly, while Murray was busing losing the GB game with that fumble,which should have been a TD, Zeke plays like a superhuman freak in the most critical games...
Murray was good, and 1800 yards was cool, but Zeke is dynamic and would have gained WAY more yardage had he received Murray's carries in 2014.. Probably don't lose that game in GB either...
And Philthy mortgaged their future too. Glad we're not Philthy.
Are you seriously trying to compare AP(future hof) to Murray?