Equal Opportunity Case

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
I explained Josh Brown, what part don't you comprehend, your argument doesn't hold water, it's not comparable..sequence of events...

If Zeke wasn't in a relationship, and he punched or beat or threw a woman 6 different times, he's receiving six games, because he was in a relationship, he receives the same 6 games, it's no different, it's all under the code of conduct detrimental to the league!!

josh brown was AFTER the 6-game policy.
no excuse.

ben may have raped someone, that is not DV.
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
20,866
If he didn't do it, how would he possibly know how they happened?

Show me where he stated he didn't do it in his prepared statement after the four panel determination that he was more likely than not that he did it what was alleged....wouldn't that be where he would state it, instead he used lawyer word salad...
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Show me where he stated he didn't do it in his prepared statement after the four panel determination that he was more likely than not that he did it what was alleged....wouldn't that be where he would state it, instead he used lawyer word salad...

How is "whether he did it" relevant to the legal strategy?
We can talk evidence, law and rules.
That is what the lawyers would be focused on.
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
20,866
josh brown was AFTER the 6-game policy.
no excuse.

ben may have raped someone, that is not DV.


Once last time if you can't grasp it, I can't help you

Brown, ONE incident known at the time of suspension, Zeke, SIX separate incidents known at the time of suspension....can you grasp one incident known is different than six incidents known...the league didn't have ESP to know something they don't know, they didn't know about the other Brown incidents therefore couldn't suspend him for it the time!!
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
20,866
How is "whether he did it" relevant to the legal strategy?
We can talk evidence, law and rules.
That is what the lawyers would be focused on.

Because you nor I know the evidence, you don't have access to it, nor do I, a summary of the complaint and conclusion is just that, a summary....
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Show me where he stated he didn't do it in his prepared statement after the four panel determination that he was more likely than not that he did it what was alleged....wouldn't that be where he would state it, instead he used lawyer word salad...
As he should. I'd prefer an absolute denial, but if you're going to do this through the courts, you let your lawyers do the talking.

You executed this guy already. You're not interested in lawful treatment.
 

The Quest for Six

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
20,866
As he should. I'd prefer an absolute denial, but if you're going to do this through the courts, you let your lawyers do the talking.

You executed this guy already. You're not interested in lawful treatment.

I have no made and determination of quilt, I stated numerous times, I don't know all the evidence, I can only state what was stated by the four panel members that reviewed all the evidence and what "THEY", not "I" concluded from that evidence, you seem the one that concluded he didn't do anything and that she's a liar.....
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I have no made and determination of quilt, I stated numerous times, I don't know all the evidence, I can only state what was stated by the four panel members that reviewed all the evidence and what "THEY", not "I" concluded from that evidence, you seem the one that concluded he didn't do anything and that she's a liar.....

I have determined nothing either. My gut says he hit her, but that she's also a habitual liar.

I do have a HUGE problem with how the NFL left out all the contradictory evidence of her story and only believed her side. That, and the inequity in sentence versus Josh Brown.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
sexual assault in a relationship files under DV too, as does hitting a woman, verbal abuse etc... If Zeke wasn't in a relationship, it would file under assault, in a relationship, it's DV, just different filing in the criminal code,

4 games is 4 games????, just stop and think about that for a second, Do you actually think that a 4 game suspension for deflating footballs is equivalent to someone beating up a woman, that punishment should be more don't you think, society thinks so,

1. accuser lied and falsified evidence - conflicting testimony about one incident doesn't dissolve 5 other known incidents
2. white player got 1 game - big ben 6 games, reduced to four, he's white, brown, 1 game, suspension/evidence not known at time of suspension - Zeke, 6 incidents - not comparable
3. zeke got much more when a) he did not do it as accuser is proven liar and b) white player got 10x less punishment while ADMITTING to his crimes.
Preponderance of evidence, 50.1% (NFLcivil )needed in decision found by four independent individuals concluded he did, I just explained in 1 and 2 decision[/QUOTE]
:hammer:
 
Top