ESPN Insider: Eagles not Cowboys NFCE Favorite

JDSmith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,273
Reaction score
5,680
Everyone in the NFL, the players, the Coaches, the GMs, the Trainers, the ball boys, know that a team built through Free Agency does not succeed.

I guess Chippy is smarter than everyone and the "experts" believe him.

It's going to be very interesting. While they have a good OL and Murray is IMO an elite RB they are putting a lot on a QB who has at least to this point not really done much. And as you said, teams built through free agency have not had any success. If they start out slow I could see the wheels coming off in an epic fashion, everyone in Philly who is eating up these reports about how they are the favorites today will be forming a lynch mob and getting after Chip. And let's face facts, he can't be that hard to catch.
 

maxdallasfan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
1,528
It's going to be very interesting. While they have a good OL and Murray is IMO an elite RB they are putting a lot on a QB who has at least to this point not really done much. And as you said, teams built through free agency have not had any success. If they start out slow I could see the wheels coming off in an epic fashion, everyone in Philly who is eating up these reports about how they are the favorites today will be forming a lynch mob and getting after Chip. And let's face facts, he can't be that hard to catch.

Don't forget they signed a CB who is not very good, forgot to sign or draft a Safety, and pissed off half of their D Line with trade rumors. Oh, don't forget they let their best WR go, Cole left, have no #1 caliber WR, and traded for a LB who is sooooo good, that even Rex Ryan, the Defensive Mastermind, didn't want.
 

Fizziksman

BanditHiro
Messages
5,127
Reaction score
3,524
Its a QB's league and they don't even have an Andy Dalton like QB. They can't be favorites at all. I'm more worried about the Giants tbh
 

Frosty

Bigdog24
Messages
3,960
Reaction score
2,257
They went 10-6 with Mark Sanchez, Hard to know what Philly will do this season but given what I consider a less than great QB they still managed to be very competitive and as I noted at the beginning were 10-6

yep, mark it down on your calendar, Mark Sanchez will be starting by week 6 if not sooner. Bradford will either be hurt or unable to produce in Kelley's offense. Bradford has never ran a kelley style offense, not a Oklahoma or with the Rams..... Philly will sorely miss Nick Foles.....
 

Afigueroa22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
470
I don't buy the thesis of the article. It clear to me that the Cowboys, on paper, on the clearly superior team.

Having said that, the 3 headed monster of Murray / Matthews / Sproles is pretty darn good.

So is the three headed monster that is Hardy, Lawrence, and Gregory.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Sam Bradford is a vast improvement at quarterback

Bradford's injury woes seemed to have caused many to forget just how superb he has played at times during his NFL career. In 2013 (his last season under center in St. Louis), Bradford ranked sixth in the league in vertical yards per attempt (a gauge of passing production on passes thrown 11 or more yards downfield) and fifth in stretch vertical yards per attempt (a production measurement for aerials thrown 20 or more yards downfield).

Keep in mind that Bradford posted these superb downfield totals while throwing to a pedestrian wide receiver corps that included Tavon Austin, Austin Pettis,Chris Givens and Brian Quick to go along with a tight end tandem of Jared Cookand Lance Kendricks. The Eagles' pass-catchers are every bit as good as this group and arguably even better, so Bradford should be able to replicate his top-level production here.

Bradford should also provide a significant upgrade in the bad decision rate (BDR) area. BDR is a statistic that tracks how often a quarterback makes a mental error that leads to a turnover opportunity for the opposing team. Upper-tier passers will end the season with a BDR of one percent or less. Average quarterbacks will post a BDR between one to two percent, while mediocre field generals will rack up a BDR of two percent or higher.

Bradford did a superb job in BDR in 2013 (0.7 percent) and had a solid showing in 2012 (1.7 percent). As long as he stays anywhere near either of these levels, it will be much better than the BDR rates posted last season by Nick Foles or Mark Sanchez, who both posted a 2.6 percent BDR in 2014. This should help to cut down the Eagles league-high 21 interceptions last season.

The makings of the best rushing attack in the NFL
The ground game is the key element in Kelly's offense, and the metrics show the Eagles could field one of the top rushing attacks in the league this year.

It starts with blocking. Last season the Eagles fared quite well in my good blocking rate (GBR) metric. GBR measures how often an offense gives its ball carriers good blocking (very roughly defined as not allowing the defense to disrupt a rush attempt) and the Eagles' 40.5 percent mark here ranked third.

That Philadelphia was able to do this despite using seven different offensive line combinations last season speaks volumes for just how well Kelly's system can keep the ball moving on the ground even in less-than-perfect conditions. Better health here alone could put the Eagles into contention for the top GBR spot.

Philadelphia won't lack for running backs who can make the most of quality blocking. DeMarco Murray's 8.9-yard good blocking yards per attempt (GBYPA) total ranked tied for 11th, but more importantly, he did this on a league-leading 160 rushing plays with good blocking. It shows Murray is capable of posting quality production over the course of an entire season.

Add to that Ryan Mathews, whose 9.9 GBYPA would have ranked tied for second had he posted enough carries to be listed as a qualifier, and Darren Sproles (11.0 GBYPA last season) and the Eagles have the caliber of talent that can direct this team to the league lead in rushing yards.


The makings of the best rushing attack in the NFL
The ground game is the key element in Kelly's offense, and the metrics show the Eagles could field one of the top rushing attacks in the league this year.

It starts with blocking. Last season the Eagles fared quite well in my good blocking rate (GBR) metric. GBR measures how often an offense gives its ball carriers good blocking (very roughly defined as not allowing the defense to disrupt a rush attempt) and the Eagles' 40.5 percent mark here ranked third.

That Philadelphia was able to do this despite using seven different offensive line combinations last season speaks volumes for just how well Kelly's system can keep the ball moving on the ground even in less-than-perfect conditions. Better health here alone could put the Eagles into contention for the top GBR spot.

Philadelphia won't lack for running backs who can make the most of quality blocking. DeMarco Murray's 8.9-yard good blocking yards per attempt (GBYPA) total ranked tied for 11th, but more importantly, he did this on a league-leading 160 rushing plays with good blocking. It shows Murray is capable of posting quality production over the course of an entire season.

Add to that Ryan Mathews, whose 9.9 GBYPA would have ranked tied for second had he posted enough carries to be listed as a qualifier, and Darren Sproles (11.0 GBYPA last season) and the Eagles have the caliber of talent that can direct this team to the league lead in rushing yards.


Pass defense should be much improved

...


Dallas will not be able to lean on the rushing game as much this season

The Cowboys' prowess in running the ball helped them lead the league in time of possession (32 minutes, 50 seconds per game) and rank next to last in pass attempts (476). This ability had the triple positive side effect of wearing opposing defenses down, protecting their own defense and limiting the number of times Tony Romo could get hit or potentially hurt his team with risky throws.

Two items are likely to cause that formula to not be quite as successful this season.

The first is the personnel changes at running back. With Murray now in Philadelphia, the Cowboys' backfield consists of Darren McFadden, Joseph Randle, Lance Dunbar and Ryan Williams.

McFadden is coming off of a season where he played 16 games for the first time in his career but he also tallied a meager 6.9 GBYPA that ranked tied for 36th in that category. Sub-par production is not an anomaly for McFadden, as he ranks next to last in yards per carry over the past three seasons (3.3).

If McFadden can't shoulder the burden, the Cowboys will call on Randle, Dunbar and Williams, a trio that has a combined 243 career rushing attempts, to take this ground game to the heights Murray took it to last year. It's possible Dallas will find another running back between now and the beginning of the season, but as things stand today, they don't have any backs who have a proven history of top-quality production on a high volume of carries.

Compounding that issue is item two, which is a Cowboys pass defense that will be greatly tested by a very difficult slate of wide receiver matchups. Pass-catchers on this list include Odell Beckham Jr. and DeSean Jackson (two games each) along with Julio Jones, Mike Evans, Vincent Jackson, Jarvis Landry,DeVante Parker, Kelvin Benjamin, Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, Brandon Marshall and Sammy Watkins.

Add in tough tight end matchups against Seattle (Jimmy Graham) and New England (Rob Gronkowski) and it looks all but certain Dallas may end up in more shootouts this season than it was last year.

These two issues will not bode well for the Cowboys leaning on the ground game as much as they did in 2014 and will help close the gap for the Eagles.

Bottom line

Kelly's system has been successful thus far with less-than-perfect fits in many personnel areas, especially at quarterback. As long as the Eagles keep Bradford healthy (they ranked first in ESPN Stats & Information's pass protection metric in 2013), they will finally be able to fully implement Kelly's program. That will pay off with Philadelphia's second NFC East title in three years.

yeah-ill-say.jpg
 
Messages
94
Reaction score
59
Your username points to the agenda you have and if you ever accuse me of not being a Cowboys fan or follow an opinion I have with an insult or submit a reply to any of my posts with comments that are anything less than civil you will be vaporized from my viewing list. You've just been pointed you in the right direction and if you don't stay in the right direction it will be see ya! No one is wiping away any of the flaws Philly has the potential for their season to go down the drain clearly exists if Bradford goes down or doesn't play well. Both the Cowboys and Eagles have made a few significant changes that could affect both teams positively or negatively. The Cowboys are banking on their OL to keep their running game going despite having 3 average backs. Philly is banking on Bradford staying healthy and being able to play effectively in Kelly's fast pace offense.

Bradford isn't the most mobile QB and who knows how well he'll be able to move coming off back to back ACL's. Losing Maclin is going to affect their passing game unless their top pick can make an impact. Trading McCoy has given Philly a potentially great young LB provided he can get back to the level he showed in Buffalo as a rookie. Murray is a loss for the Cowboys and anyone here who thinks the team won't feel it some is kidding themselves. The Cowboys are going to have to face him twice provided he stays healthy and it won't be easy containing him. He made a lot of runs due to huge holes by the OL but he also made some terrific runs on his own due to the talent he has. Both teams have areas they need to improve but the Cowboys can't just worry about Philly with Cruz coming back with the Giants along with Beckham Jr. The Giants may also be a team to reckon with and if the Cowboys and Philly focus too much on each other the Giants could sneak up on them.

LOL, This thread is better than YouTube!
 

ActualCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,416
Reaction score
9,498
Your username points to the agenda you have and if you ever accuse me of not being a Cowboys fan or follow an opinion I have with an insult or submit a reply to any of my posts with comments that are anything less than civil you will be vaporized from my viewing list. You've just been pointed you in the right direction and if you don't stay in the right direction it will be see ya! No one is wiping away any of the flaws Philly has the potential for their season to go down the drain clearly exists if Bradford goes down or doesn't play well. Both the Cowboys and Eagles have made a few significant changes that could affect both teams positively or negatively. The Cowboys are banking on their OL to keep their running game going despite having 3 average backs. Philly is banking on Bradford staying healthy and being able to play effectively in Kelly's fast pace offense.

Bradford isn't the most mobile QB and who knows how well he'll be able to move coming off back to back ACL's. Losing Maclin is going to affect their passing game unless their top pick can make an impact. Trading McCoy has given Philly a potentially great young LB provided he can get back to the level he showed in Buffalo as a rookie. Murray is a loss for the Cowboys and anyone here who thinks the team won't feel it some is kidding themselves. The Cowboys are going to have to face him twice provided he stays healthy and it won't be easy containing him. He made a lot of runs due to huge holes by the OL but he also made some terrific runs on his own due to the talent he has. Both teams have areas they need to improve but the Cowboys can't just worry about Philly with Cruz coming back with the Giants along with Beckham Jr. The Giants may also be a team to reckon with and if the Cowboys and Philly focus too much on each other the Giants could sneak up on them.

Methinks thou doth protest too much. Mine aim was true.
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
Exactly, most forget or just don't care to remember the good games Murray had while the OL was still in transition 4 years ago. He set the Cowboys single game rushing record as a rookie while the OL was in transition with Tyron Smith being the only #1 pick upfront. None of the other backs the Cowboys had during the OL's transitioning years were as effective as Murray. In the games he missed due to injury the Cowboys running game suffered without him most notably in 2013 vs Detroit when Randle who got the start only averaged 1.9 a carry and took a 3 yard loss on the Cowboys final possession with the team trying to run out the clock with only 1:02 left in the game. The Cowboys inability to run the ball that day exposed their defense and got them beat in the final seconds. It was a game that contributed to the Cowboys missing the playoffs that season.

The biggest question is whether Murray is a big improvement over McCoy for the Eagles. They both had similar stats when comparing the last two years with McCoy running behind a less talented line. I'm also not buying the Bradford hype. Bradford's QB rating was only marginally better than Sanchez's QB rating last year.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,532
Reaction score
39,750
LOL, This thread is better than YouTube!

You must be as new to this site as you are to YouTube. So what do you think of the Internet and how does it feel to be a free man after all these years? Just having some fun with you. :) Nothing special about this thread it's typical of what you see here. Just hang around it gets a lot better than this.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,532
Reaction score
39,750
The biggest question is whether Murray is a big improvement over McCoy for the Eagles. They both had similar stats when comparing the last two years with McCoy running behind a less talented line. I'm also not buying the Bradford hype. Bradford's QB rating was only marginally better than Sanchez's QB rating last year.

I believe the combination of Murray/Mathews could be an improvement over McCoy. I rate McCoy as a better back than Murray but Murray's running style may fi Philly better than McCoy's. Murray is a better inside runner in my opinion and is more punishing while McCoy is more of a perimeter runner who is quicker and faster. If Murray and Mathews stay healthy that's going to provide Philly with a solid one-two punch. Spreading out carries between them is going to keep them fresh and having some fresh legs heading onto the 4th quarter could pay some big dividends for them especially when Dec arrives. As for Bradford his situation in St Louis affected his stats. As I mentioned he didn't have a consistent running game or consistent pass protection and his receivers couldn't get open which played a big part in his injuries and lack of production.

The fact that Sanchez was really productive in a few games for Philly last season shows what a better supporting cast can do for even an average QB. Let's say Bradford does get hurt again Philly showed last season they can win games with Sanchez because he showed with the Jets if you give him a solid running game he can play pretty well. Both Foles and Sanchez had some success in Kelly's offense and Bradford has a better skill set than both of those QB's. It's all going to come down to whether Bradford can stay healthy and Kelly's offense fits him.
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
I believe the combination of Murray/Mathews could be an improvement over McCoy. I rate McCoy as a better back than Murray but Murray's running style may fi Philly better than McCoy's. Murray is a better inside runner in my opinion and is more punishing while McCoy is more of a perimeter runner who is quicker and faster. If Murray and Mathews stay healthy that's going to provide Philly with a solid one-two punch. Spreading out carries between them is going to keep them fresh and having some fresh legs heading onto the 4th quarter could pay some big dividends for them especially when Dec arrives. As for Bradford his situation in St Louis affected his stats. As I mentioned he didn't have a consistent running game or consistent pass protection and his receivers couldn't get open which played a big part in his injuries and lack of production.

The fact that Sanchez was really productive in a few games for Philly last season shows what a better supporting cast can do for even an average QB. Let's say Bradford does get hurt again Philly showed last season they can win games with Sanchez because he showed with the Jets if you give him a solid running game he can play pretty well. Both Foles and Sanchez had some success in Kelly's offense and Bradford has a better skill set than both of those QB's. It's all going to come down to whether Bradford can stay healthy and Kelly's offense fits him.

These are some big ifs for Philly. You claim the worse line (than Dallas) will have little effect on Murray, but the better line (than St. Louis) will give Bradford a huge bonus. You could say the same thing about coaching (Dallas > Philly > St. Louis). I'm not buying the hype even if Bradford, Murray, and Matthews all stay healthy.
I'm not even sure Bradfords receivers are that much better in Philly. They seem to have the worst group in the division.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
102,744
Reaction score
115,235
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I don't mind people picking against the Cowboys if the give a legit argument as to why, not so made up crap.

For example........................good argument as to why the Cowboys will not win the East......................no team has won the East back-to-back in the last 10 years.

Bad argument as to why the Cowboys will not win the East........................Bradford is a stud at QB and you need to keep the ball out of Romo's hands.
:clap:
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
62,532
Reaction score
39,750
These are some big ifs for Philly. You claim the worse line (than Dallas) will have little effect on Murray, but the better line (than St. Louis) will give Bradford a huge bonus. You could say the same thing about coaching (Dallas > Philly > St. Louis). I'm not buying the hype even if Bradford, Murray, and Matthews all stay healthy.
I'm not even sure Bradfords receivers are that much better in Philly. They seem to have the worst group in the division.

Better go back and read my post again because I didn't claim Philly's line will have little effect on Murray or provide Bradford with a huge bonus. Philly is a better offensive team than St Louis the Eagles ranked 5th in total offense last season compared to 28th for St Louis and Philly accomplished that with Sanchez for half the season. A better running game than Bradford had in St Louis will certainly help him. You have to figure the running game is going to be better Philly ranked 9th in rushing last season compared to St Louis who ranked 20th. Sanchez put up 374 yards vs Washington which was a career high for him and he completed 74% of his passes in that game so if Sanchez and Foles can have the success they had under Kelly a healthy Sam Bradford can have some success as well. I'm not making any predictions here we'll just have to see how things play out. There's a lot of assumptions being made with the Cowboys and Philly but last season showed anything can happen.

The Giants could end up being better than both the Cowboys and Philly with the speed threats they have at WR. The Cowboys seemed to have the worst defensive group heading into last season and with Romo coming off back surgery the Cowboys looked like the worst team in the league but it certainly didn't turn out that way. For the Cowboys to have success they'll have to continue to be able to run the ball keeping the defense off the field. For Philly they're going to have to get consistent play from their QB and hope their defense can hold up being on the field a lot because their fast pace offense isn't about controlling the ball.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
And Shady seemed to get a lot worse in player rankings once Philly traded him, Murray's abilities got more praise once he donned the wings

Seriously, I seem to remember MANY people calling him one of the best, if not THE best back in the game only a year ago. Now that he's not with the Eagles anymore, he's not even part of that conversation anymore. I honestly don't know if he was overrated for being on the Eagles, or is being underrated because he's not on American media's favorite team anymore.
 
Top