Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
Keep in mind your dealing with a guy that wanted to cut all the RBs and bring in Brandon Jacobs.
Lay off the crazy diamond.
Keep in mind your dealing with a guy that wanted to cut all the RBs and bring in Brandon Jacobs.
He's having a Joseph Garza meltdown
I'd take Sean Payton if he leaves New Orleans.
WHO CARES MAN? CLOSE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. WE NEED TO WIN A FOOTBALL GAME PERIOD AND THESE JOKERS AREN'T DOING ENOUGH TO WIN PERIOD. STOP THE EXCUSES. WIN A GAME. JUST ONE IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
That's what gets me about MOST of the JG support group. When Parcells was here with a MUCH MUCH les talented roster they complained he had the team playing not to lose. Now it's golden boy doing the same thing only worse an it's every thing but what he's doing as coach. Head scratcher for sure.
You should have stopped before you attempted this analysis.
Take the top 2 offensive players out of any team's lineup and they will struggle. Your scenario is omitting the fact that Dez has been out.
As much as people will cry Dez does not win us football games there is only one receiver in all football history that has ever won a team games and that was Randy moss in 1998
As much as people will cry Dez does not win us football games there is only one receiver in all football history that has ever won a team games and that was Randy moss in 1998
The truth is that no matter how much Weeden sucks, or how poorly Cassel has played, or how bad a play caller Linehan has been or how poor a head coach Garrett is and even how bad an owner Jerry and son are, the fact is that you can win off of scheme alone.
Was it Garrett or Romo last season?
As much as people will cry Dez does not win us football games there is only one receiver in all football history that has ever won a team games and that was Randy moss in 1998
That's what we call a false dichotomy.
The roster without Tony, Dez and Hardy isn't very talented. No team without their 3 best players is. Any determination made under those circumstances is going to be flawed. Especially since the counterbalance is that when those circumstances didn't exist, the team went undefeated.
Clearly Romo. Is this even a question?
He's had two of the three for quite a while Plus Ware. We went undefeated because Eli was a moron and Philly is in worse shape than the boys coaching wise.
So you're comfortable making a conclusion about the team without evidence of their performance with those players, even though the only evidence available is the opposite of your conclusion? And even though the games played without those players would imply that their appearance would likely flip the outcome? Was Garrett the coach last season? Or does all the evidence that doesn't fit your narrative recede from the argument?
WHO CARES MAN? CLOSE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. WE NEED TO WIN A FOOTBALL GAME PERIOD AND THESE JOKERS AREN'T DOING ENOUGH TO WIN PERIOD. STOP THE EXCUSES. WIN A GAME. JUST ONE IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?