I'd be curious how often this has happened in the NFL.we traded to get back a guy we already cut in the past lol
I'd be curious how often this has happened in the NFL.
Specifically, trading a pick for a player you cut.
Jerry does need to give some people new stuff to complain about....I'd be curious how often this has happened in the NFL.
Specifically, trading a pick for a player you cut.
Yawn.....the theme of this off season. I hope this doesn't carry into the regular season.......Yes they did.
Excited?
$100 million dollars?! Jeepers. That ball club must really know what they're doing! I mean what other explanation could there e for hiring a coach that's proven he can't build a roster. They are SO far ahead of the curve, here. I'm almost jealous (and I'm CERTAIN that you are).
Hell no, but here we are. I'm partly guilty for this also, so I shouldn't complain. I supplied too many posts to this thread myself.
And here's another one! I need an Intervention!
Olawale was rated the 2nd best pass-blocking FB in the NFL last year. Problem is he played just 82 total offensive snaps.
is your friend the liquor store guy...Are we talking about the same Gruden who got fired from his last job when they realized he didn't know **** about building a roster or a different Gruden? Asking for a friend.
Hey Corso, I thought you were going to start pumping iron and getting ripped like Beast is.
Here are a couple of friends of mine to get you motivated.............
If this trade does not prove Garrett's fetish with a niche position, I don't know what does.
I don't mind the "swap" overall. Got an older but better player, relatively non-descript draft impact. Could actually be a win.
But fullback is so damn important we have to trade for that versus any of the other gaping holes in this roster?
I just want someone to explain this to me in a way that makes sense.
we traded to get back a guy we already cut in the past lol
Im a Eagles fan and I know they swiped him from Cowboys practice squad .... So Raiders use him up , and give him back with interest Im betting he would of been cut since they already signed his replacement
except then he probably would have cost more than 1.64mm if someone else were to bid then you have the whole sell the teams plan and wait for a decision. they paid a slight premium a 5th to make sure he was here.That’s what doesn’t make sense about the deal.
He would’ve been available in a few months
If this trade does not prove Garrett's fetish with a niche position, I don't know what does.
I don't mind the "swap" overall. Got an older but better player, relatively non-descript draft impact. Could actually be a win.
But fullback is so damn important we have to trade for that versus any of the other gaping holes in this roster?
I just want someone to explain this to me in a way that makes sense.