I love Zeke as a player. I HATE the idea of drafting a RB in the top 5. I'm trying to prepare myself for them actually doing it, though, if it comes down to it, and honestly, trying to talk myself into being okay with it. I'm not there yet.
If he is the pick, I hope we hope we give him the ball 25 times a game, 16 games a year for 5 years, then move on. I can buy the argument that RBs are worth a first round pick (not top 5) more than I buy they idea that they're worth big contracts after their rookie deal. After 400 touches a year, 2,000 over his rookie contract (never mind playoff games), I won't be on board with giving him Charles, McCoy, Peterson money. Based on the press confrence, I think that's where Jerry&Co. are at as well.
Here's what I'll convince myself is the plus side: We got a difference maker over a 5 year period whod could potentially be as valuable as Dez over that span. Our defense will suck, but we may be able to control the clock enough to compete with anyone. In addition, the draft is loaded at the DL spots. We could grab a DE and 1T who could help our pass rush, knock on wood. Plus, the kid will be fun as **** to watch.
Again, I don't want him at 5. I think it's a bad move that we'll come to regret if he gets hurt and/or in 5 years when it's time to move on. But, I'll try to find the positive side and enjoy the ride.
I would think it was a very bad move (value, we already have a 1,500 yard back in the stable, D needs where value meets need etc.), but if he is a Cowboy I will root for him to be the best in the league and cheer him on every Sunday.
I would curse Jerry every which way from Sunday though.
Who is a 1500 yard back on this roster?
Alfred Morris ran for 1613 yards in Washington.
Alfred Morris ran for 1613 yards in Washington.
I love Zeke as a player. I HATE the idea of drafting a RB in the top 5. I'm trying to prepare myself for them actually doing it, though, if it comes down to it, and honestly, trying to talk myself into being okay with it. I'm not there yet.
If he is the pick, I hope we hope we give him the ball 25 times a game, 16 games a year for 5 years, then move on. I can buy the argument that RBs are worth a first round pick (not top 5) more than I buy they idea that they're worth big contracts after their rookie deal. After 400 touches a year, 2,000 over his rookie contract (never mind playoff games), I won't be on board with giving him Charles, McCoy, Peterson money. Based on the press confrence, I think that's where Jerry&Co. are at as well.
Here's what I'll convince myself is the plus side: We got a difference maker over a 5 year period whod could potentially be as valuable as Dez over that span. Our defense will suck, but we may be able to control the clock enough to compete with anyone. In addition, the draft is loaded at the DL spots. We could grab a DE and 1T who could help our pass rush, knock on wood. Plus, the kid will be fun as **** to watch.
Again, I don't want him at 5. I think it's a bad move that we'll come to regret if he gets hurt and/or in 5 years when it's time to move on. But, I'll try to find the positive side and enjoy the ride.
That was a long time ago. He isn't close to the same guy.
That was a long time ago. He isn't close to the same guy.
Ridiculous comparison. Your comment is true, though duh....AP has a bigger impact on the NFL than Revis or Sherman. That's the nature of being an offensive star vs a defensive star at a position the offense can simply avoid. But to compare Ramsey to Mo is weak.I just find it funny how so many people hate the idea of drafting a RB in the top 5 but rejoice when they get a cornerback that high.
Mark it down. Barring unforeseen injury, Ezekiel Elliott will make much more of an impact in the NFL than Jalen Ramsey. It won't even be close. Like Todd Gurley to Morris Claiborne.
I just find it funny how so many people hate the idea of drafting a RB in the top 5 but rejoice when they get a cornerback that high.
Mark it down. Barring unforeseen injury, Ezekiel Elliott will make much more of an impact in the NFL than Jalen Ramsey. It won't even be close. Like Todd Gurley to Morris Claiborne.
Ridiculous comparison. Your comment is true, though duh....AP has a bigger impact on the NFL than Revis or Sherman. That's the nature of being an offensive star vs a defensive star at a position the offense can simply avoid. But to compare Ramsey to Mo is weak.
I wont go into what you predict. But i do admit i have a problem if we'd take Ramsey.
I just dont like the idea of taking a player that high who "could" play CB and "could" be good or play Saftety and "could" be great.
A player taken at 4 has to be great at the position he plays. Not a maybe this or that.
Another thing is what do we do with all those FS type of players if we draft Ramsey ? We need at least one SS. Lets invest in that position and draft a real CB.
Ridiculous comparison. Your comment is true, though duh....AP has a bigger impact on the NFL than Revis or Sherman. That's the nature of being an offensive star vs a defensive star at a position the offense can simply avoid. But to compare Ramsey to Mo is weak.
I just find it funny how so many people hate the idea of drafting a RB in the top 5 but rejoice when they get a cornerback that high.
Mark it down. Barring unforeseen injury, Ezekiel Elliott will make much more of an impact in the NFL than Jalen Ramsey. It won't even be close. Like Todd Gurley to Morris Claiborne.