If LT is far and away the best talent at the time then I'd be happy with it. If its close I'd prefer defense. Philbin can make it work with our depth. The oline was so battered this season and they managed to keep the offense a float. I think the silver lining is our depth grew leaps and bounds, some of them showed promise.
I think people are seeing the OL through the lens of having both tackles out, Martin out for several games, the swing tackle out, Looney out for a while, Biadasz out for a while, and Frederick having retired.
This was a nuclear disaster unlikely to be repeated. And if it is repeated, it will be a nuclear disaster again, regardless of who you have added.
Through that lens, it seems as if the loss of one player is insurmountable. But that really isn't the case. It is one thing to replace 1-2 starters, and it is another thing to replace 4 starters and a couple primary backups.
The Cowboys were essentially playing without their OL. Judging the state of that line when its components return is quite different than judging it without those components.
There also is an odd narrative in which good, durable players (Martin and Collins) are treated as damaged merchandise because they suffered a single injury. I've seen articles in which Collins isn't mentioned -- as if he doesn't exist.
I do understand the trepidation about Tyron's future. He has missed a lot of games in recent seasons. But I don't understand why people have zero faith that the surgery might change that narrative.
Maybe all of this stems from the shock of Frederick's untimely retirement. But that was a rare and unfortunate circumstance.
Good NFL OL generally have long careers. Many are effective well into their 30s.
It seems as if last year's horrid luck gave many of us battered fan syndrome.