jobberone;3174408 said:I don't know if its Garrett or execution. I'd say both.
Idgit;3174454 said:Inside the red zone, it's been both. It's about the only valid criticism of Garrett on this board this year. That said, a lot of it's execution which for some reason we like to overlook.
Eskimo;3174457 said:Part of execution is getting the players to understand their assignments and make it so that they almost automatically do the right thing. This is 50% coaching and 50% players. Since we have made a point of trying not to bring in knuckleheads for many years (with the exception being 2008), it leads me to believe the issue is coaching.
Idgit;3174471 said:I see the point, but I think you have to put execution 100% on the players once they're on the field. It's an easy excuse to blame the coordinator when the right side of your line gets submarined 4 times in a row from inside the 3. At some point, you have to expect the players to do what they've been coached to do properly. It's not like Hauck forgot how to teach goal-line run blocking this year.
Eskimo;3174493 said:If the players can't learn then it is up to the coach to put in the players that know their assignments and sit the ones who don't. Then in the offseason, the FO has to get rid of the players who don't learn from the coaching. It is as simple as that.
The players here are far too complacent. If only we had a BP figure in the background in between the HC and the owner who could lay down the law (because Wade cannot do it) we might be much better off right now.
Idgit;3174572 said:It's not usually a situation where the players don't know their assignments (botched handoffs aside), it's that they're getting beat or just not doing their jobs. Like the goal line blocking against SD, or Folk's blown FG against the Saints. Or inopportune hands:face penalties on defense that give fresh sets of downs and are basically turnovers. Or blown pickups in pass protection where the outside man clearly belongs to the LT and doesn't get picked up.
That said, I agree: Wade's too slow to make lineup changes, or to sit players, when mistakes crop up.
Oh, I'm fully aware that your initial statement was wrong.Eskimo;3174330 said:It wasn't really so much about RoyW as it was about their explosiveness and ability to put points on the board. I initially thought it was their receivers who did it but....
The Curly One;3178012 said:Flosmell has always been marginal and you people keep making excuses for it. He was new, He was beside Larry Allen, He did not understand what Parcells wanted from him (Seriously Uh maybe block somebody? Just a thought), He was hurt, he was in a contact season, and the excuses go on and on. You are still making excuses for him! The only thing consistant about Flosmell has been poor performance from the word go. He has never made the cut. My favorite excuse was "He did not understand what Parcells wanted from him" Now you got to admit that one was funny!. A linemens job is fairly simple- protect Qb and open holes for RB. Do not hold or get false starts. When do you think Flosmell will figure that out?
CowboyMcCoy;3170579 said:The thing is you're flying under the assumption that Free is suited to play LT as well as he is RT. I love Free, but I don't think this is the case. If anything, I'd say Columbo would be a LT candidate.
MarionBarberThe4th;3173099 said:Dont get too attatched to players.
I love MB3, but history would indicate hes got a handful of years left.
I appreciate Spears, but wont cry if hes not re-upped.
Flo should be cut next year. Theres no cap so this is your chance to get out before he falls off the cliff.
Many LT's can do what this Flozell does. Make rushers run around you and hope Romo makes him miss.
theogt;3174846 said:Oh, I'm fully aware that your initial statement was wrong.
And I'm fully aware that you'll continue to move the goal post until you declare yourself correct.