theogt;3171261 said:I think we can't say with a pretty substantial certainty how well Free will play as a LT and it's better than the Flozell is playing right now.
MichaelWinicki;3171137 said:Yep.
I'd give odds of greater than 50/50 that Adams is either released or retires prior to the '10 season.
He's a long way away from being the player he was under Parcells.
jobberone;3171553 said:Fixed that for you.
He's never played a single regular season down as a LT. You can only say that from an opinionated point of view. We know very little what he can do. Preseason gives you a glimpse of potential but you can't hang your hat on that.
Last year Flozell officially gave up 7 sacks which is middle of the road. He was one of the more penalized LTs in the game but most of those are false starts and not holding (or tripping penalties).
If you want to argue he's getting slower I'll give you that. But right now he's the best LT we have. Ask most of the better pass rushers in the league that he totally shuts down. I will complain that he seems to play to the level of competition and is not as dominating as he should be. I see this as a sign of laziness in him. But he's doing his job. Could be better. Could absolutely be a lot worse.
Some of you guys don't know when you have it good.
If you want to argue we should draft a LT in the upcoming draft then I'm right there with you. We won't likely get a blue chipper but we should be able to draft a solid LT for the future and we might just get lucky. Free has the feet to play LT and he might have the technique. But he's not got the strength of a premier LT. I'm looking forward to seeing what he has but he won't get the chance barring injury this year. And there is a perfectly good reason for that.
TheSport78;3171559 said:Strength is always something you can improve and work on. I'm pretty sure if Free gets an opportunity to be the LT next year, he will work his butt off in the weight room to improve on his weaknesses. I agree Flozell is still good, but there comes a point when you just need to move on. 34, 31, 31, 31 and 31. What are those numbers? The ages of our starting offensive line. There comes a point when you just need to get younger at certain positions. Knowing Jerry he won't draft a LT with the first pick. He'll take the best player available once again, and hopefully it's a ILB or S. I'm more concerned about the OG/C position. Flozell has clearly regressed this year and it's easy to see. We just have to move on and get younger.
jobberone;3171555 said:Come on Michael. He's giving up the same amount of sacks as usual over the years. He's a middle of the road LT as far as sacks are concerned. He's better than usual at not holding. He's by far worse than average at getting penalized otherwise which is his worse attribute. And he can be lazy.
His best attribute is the opposite of that. He rises to the occasion when it comes to keeping premier pass rushers off Romo. He routinely shuts some of the best out.
Free may turn out to be better but NOBODY knows that at the present time.
burmafrd;3171545 said:Where do these people get the fantasy that Gurode can be a good guard? We tried for 3 years and he was mediocre. Are all you guys that want this so new to the Boys that you do not remember that?
TheSport78;3171559 said:Strength is always something you can improve and work on. I'm pretty sure if Free gets an opportunity to be the LT next year, he will work his butt off in the weight room to improve on his weaknesses. I agree Flozell is still good, but there comes a point when you just need to move on. 34, 31, 31, 31 and 31. What are those numbers? The ages of our starting offensive line. There comes a point when you just need to get younger at certain positions. Knowing Jerry he won't draft a LT with the first pick. He'll take the best player available once again, and hopefully it's a ILB or S. I'm more concerned about the OG/C position. Flozell has clearly regressed this year and it's easy to see. We just have to move on and get younger.
MichaelWinicki;3171596 said:I agree that Adams isn't bad... He's just kinda average at this point all considered.
It just stands to reason he won't be better next year than he is now. And he probably won't be as good next year as he is now.
What are the chances that he'll decline even more next year given his age?
Pretty good I would say.
Good enough so that something needs to be put into the works between now and the start of next training camp so that a continuing-to-decline Flozell Adams isn't the only option at LT that this team has.
Or RB.FuzzyLumpkins;3171612 said:Best Player Available thats not a TE or QB.
theogt;3171619 said:Or RB.
theogt;3171619 said:Or RB.
burmafrd;3171648 said:Actually I think this coming year we can give WR a miss. Ogletree looks like he can really do something, Hurd is solid, and we still have Crayton, Roy and Miles. Maybe take a flier late on a couple of speed burners that are raw, but really otherwise save the higher picks for OL and LB, and shoot maybe try for another FS.
FuzzyLumpkins;3171703 said:Hurd is ST fodder. I agree though that WR should never be drafted in the first.
No RB I can def go with but if a pass rushing OLB, cover corner or a top G/C is there you absolutely take them at the end of the first. Typically you can get good value at ILB, S and C/G there at the end of the first; whereas, OT gets eaten up quickly.
NextGenBoys;3171717 said:Disagree. He's a great ST player, and makes plays when called upon.
I really like what Sam Hurd brings to this team.
theogt;3171204 said:I think he's been underrated for a while, mostly because people focus on the penalties.
I dunno, I could see a WR, CB or OLB being drafted in the first round if they're they clear cut best available at that point.MichaelWinicki;3171637 said:I doubt they would draft a CB, OLB or C/OG #1 either.
Oh and add WR to the list.
Not because it isn't an area of need, but because there is a bigger phobia at Valley Ranch about drafting WR's #1 than there is Olinemen.