For all you T.O bashers listen to Mickey Spags

[theogt]

i know i don't give a damn.

i know no one but TO knows if it was intentional or not so it's kinda pointless to say that EVEN IF you're "defending" him.

who cares about this issue? make it any other player the "interest" fades.

go figure.

So what's the point of stating it was intentional and arguing with others who say they don't know?

 

[Clove]

Just checking in. Wow! This argument will go on forever..:scream:

 

[theogt]

It is not even TO it becomes the defense of his actions by some that cause these thread to grow. Your right the incident is over and the league has handed down the fine end of story as far as the Cowboys and TO are concerned. I think some are more flabbergasted how anyone can defend the action

These threads are two-sided, my friend.

I think some people are flabbergasted at how people can call TO all sorts of names and say they lost respect for him, etc., etc., etc., without actually knowing what happened.

 

[ilovejerry]

I'll always debate a subject.

I can't tell you how to go on with your life. The role of a conscience was played by an animated grasshopper for a wooden puppet who wanted to be a real boy.

I did not ask you that, How to go on with my life, I guess comprehension is not your stung suit,

 

[Hostile]

I reiterate what did I miss?

Okay, let's start with the premise that you admit to not liking Hall and don't care what happens to him.

For me that's already on the wrong path. I don't like Hall either, but I'm not going to condone or applaud a sick act.

I don't care for Sean Taylor. Not going to cheer him being injured like Philly fans did Irvin.

Right isn't right only when it means someone I like. Hence why I said I won't defend my children if they are wrong. If they burn down your house I'm not going to insult you by trying to rationalize it, deny it, or justify it. Wrong is always wrong.

It's just that simple.

I think you'll find I'm very consistent about this. This isn't about me hating TO. It never has been. When he's right I'll defend him, and I have on numerous occasions. When he's wrong, I'll say so. His uniform doesn't buy him anything with me that I'd deny anyone else.

 

[ilovejerry]

Just checking in. Wow! This argument will go on forever..:scream:

Yes because instead of talking about facts people feel that there opinions mean more then there worth,

 

[Hostile]

I did not ask you that, How to go on with my life, I guess comprehension is not your stung suit,

You didn't huh? Let's take a look. I'll put it in bold so as to help your short term memory.

You still want to debate. About what I gracefully read your points and gave you my thoughts what am I missing, My hands are full, right now what do we need to discuss now,please tell me so I can go on with my life Sir.

I can't tell you that. It's not my job.

If you want to keep discussing it we can do that. Insult me again and I'll insult you back just like I did above about your short term memory. Make it a habit and I'll humiliate you. Not a smart path to have taken. You can either jump back off of it, or stay on it and get steamrolled.

That choice is yours.

 

[iceberg]

So what's the point of stating it was intentional and arguing with others who say they don't know?

expressing my apathy isn't arguing. maybe it's as pointless, but it's not arguing.

 

[theogt]

expressing my apathy isn't arguing. maybe it's as pointless, but it's not arguing.

I wasn't referring to you. You were referring to others in your post and I was talking about those very people.

 

[theogt]

You didn't huh? Let's take a look. I'll put it in bold so as to help your short term memory.

I can't tell you that. It's not my job.

If you want to keep discussing it we can do that. Insult me again and I'll insult you back just like I did above about your short term memory. Make it a habit and I'll humiliate you. Not a smart path to have taken. You can either jump back off of it, or stay on it and get steamrolled.

That choice is yours.

He was asking what the discussion was about, not about what he needed to do with his life. He wanted to know what the discussion was about so he could go on with his life.

 

[ilovejerry]

It often happens when you fall on the wrong side of an issue and have to spin control to defend it.

This is what I'm referring to. I would like to know what was spun, but obviously you think this is a game of debate, in your infinitesimal mind.

 

[ilovejerry]

He was asking what the discussion was about, not about what he needed to do with his life. He wanted to know what the discussion was about so he could go on with his life.

This guy has many issue's.

 

[iceberg]

I wasn't referring to you. You were referring to others in your post and I was talking about those very people.

my apathy forbids me to know the difference. : )

 

[theogt]

This guy has many issue's.

He just misread your post. You don't exactly make it easy on people to read your posts.

 

[zeromaster]

20 pages and counting, all over a civilized discussion of bodily fluids...

Scary, in a non-life-threatening sort of way.

 

[ilovejerry]

He just misread your post. You don't exactly make it easy on people to read your posts.

I messed up one post, But he understood, because I snide comment was not warranted

 

[theogt]

I messed up one post, But he understood, because I snide comment was not warranted

Irony, my friend. Irony.

 

[ilovejerry]

20 pages and counting, all over a civilized discussion of bodily fluids...

Scary, in a non-life-threatening sort of way.

Isn't this a great country, Then again it kept me amused today in some sort of sick way

 

[Hostile]

He was asking what the discussion was about, not about what he needed to do with his life. He wanted to know what the discussion was about so he could go on with his life.

I stand by what I said. It's not my job to be his conscience.

This is what I'm referring to. I would like to know what was spun, but obviously you think this is a game of debate, in your infinitesimal mind.

I've explained it to you twice. You want to continue the insults then expect the responses. I did not insult you. I simply said it's easy to fele your hands are full when you're on the wrong side.

I messed up one post, But he understood, because I snide comment was not warranted

Snide comment? Oh, not even close to snide by me. I told you how to fix the post.

Irony, my friend. Irony.

Actually it's called honesty.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

TO was told that Hall had accused him of spitting and what he had to say about it. TO said that he was sorry about that but there was nothing he could do and was looking forward to moving on.

All one can really infer from that with ceratinty is that he was sorry that Hall accused him of that. Now it takes a stretch to say with a certainty that TOs apology was a result of his intentionally spitting without provocation.

Did TO spit on him, probably. Personally I thinbk the whole thing is stupid. Hall is a donkeyhole.