For all you T.O bashers listen to Mickey Spags

[theogt]

I stand by what I said. It's not my job to be his conscience.

I've explained it to you twice. You want to continue the insults then expect the responses. I did not insult you. I simply said it's easy to fele your hands are full when you're on the wrong side.

Snide comment? Oh, not even close to snide by me. I told you how to fix the post.

Actually it's called honesty.

It was ironic that he claimed only screwing up one post when he screwed up the the post in which he was making the claim.

Sort of like saying, "I sure are not stupid. I never use perfect English wrongly."

 

[Hostile]

Did he intentionally spit on him?

I don't know if he did or not. I think the only wrong position here is claiming one side or the other.

I disagree.

So you know that he spit on him intentionally?

I put in bold what I disagree with since I never said I know he did anything intentionally.

 

[bbgun]

And if TO were released tomorrow, Mick would quickly change his tune and praise the powers that be for their foresight and wisdom in ridding this team of this cancer. He's a disgraceful company man, period.

 

[Hostile]

It was ironic that he claimed only screwing up one post when he screwed up the the post in which he was making the claim.

Sort of like saying, "I sure are not stupid. I never use perfect English wrongly."

Gotcha.

 

[stealth]

I Love Lamp!

 

[theogt]

I put in bold what I disagree with since I never said I know he did anything intentionally.

So claiming to know he did do it or didn't do it is not wrong even though you don't know whether he did it or not?

 

[Hostile]

So claiming to know he did do it or didn't do it is not wrong even though you don't know whether he did it or not?

Holy cow man. I disagree that the only wrong stance is claiming one side or the other.

I don't agree with that. At all.

 

[stealth]

Holy cow man. I disagree that the only wrong stance is claiming one side or the other.

I don't agree with that. At all.

really you don't think picking sides is wrong when all the facts aren't in front of you?

huh I really never woulda guessed that

 

[theogt]

Holy cow man. I disagree that the only wrong stance is claiming one side or the other.

I don't agree with that. At all.

So my question stands. I don't claim to know whether he did it or not. I don't see how anyone could claim one way or the other to know. Holy cow.

 

[Hostile]

really you don't think picking sides is wrong when all the facts aren't in front of you?

huh I really never woulda guessed that

Why is this so hard to comprehend?

I think someone thinking it is wrong to spit on another human being is not wrong. I don't see that as picking sides. I see that as right or wrong. If someone says Hall is a punk and deserved it that is crap.

 

[theogt]

Why is this so hard to comprehend?

I think someone thinking it is wrong to spit on another human being is not wrong. I don't see that as picking sides. I see that as right or wrong. If someone says Hall is a punk and deserved it that is crap.

I don't the poster you were replying to ever claimed that spitting wasn't wrong. I think you're distorting things a little here.

 

[Hostile]

So my question stands. I don't claim to know whether he did it or not. I don't see how anyone could claim one way or the other to know. Holy cow.

He admitted to it.

I appreciate his honesty. Doesn't justify him doing it. Doesn't make it somewhat okay. The spin control afterwards has no affect on me.

 

[theogt]

He admitted to it.

I appreciate his honesty. Doesn't justify him doing it. Doesn't make it somewhat okay. The spin control afterwards has no affect on me.

He never admitted to intentionally spitting on him.

 

[Hostile]

I don't the poster you were replying to ever claimed that spitting wasn't wrong. I think you're distorting things a little here.

You can think that if you wish. Go back and read my stance on it and you'll see that you're wrong to assume that. But by all means have at it.

 

[Hostile]

He never admitted to intentionally spitting on him.

Riiiiiiiiiiight.

:wink2:

 

[stealth]

Why is this so hard to comprehend?

I think someone thinking it is wrong to spit on another human being is not wrong. I don't see that as picking sides. I see that as right or wrong. If someone says Hall is a punk and deserved it that is crap.

was that said?

TO says it wans't intentional
Hall says it was

thats all that anything has been about
thats the thing I don't hear a confession in his first statement to the media that says he did it on purpose. You do, but its not about whether spitting was right or wrong

 

[theogt]

Riiiiiiiiiiight.

:wink2:

He didn't. He made two statements (I am paraphrasing):

Statement #1: I am sorry for spitting on him.

Statement #2: I didn't haul off and spit on him intentionally.

This is precisely my point. You don't know whether he intentionally spit on him or not. You are claiming he intentionally spit on him.

Making a decision without knowing the truth seems to be the wrong choice here.

 

[Hostile]

He didn't. He made two statements (I am paraphrasing):

Statement #1: I am sorry for spitting on him.

Statement #2: I didn't haul off and spit on him intentionally.

Yes, and the paraphrasing you chose to do isn't acurate.

Hey, whatever, defend the act. If that makes you feel good defend it.

 

[theogt]

Yes, and the paraphrasing you chose to do isn't acurate.

Hey, whatever, defend the act. If that makes you feel good defend it.

It's accurate. You want to state something as fact when you don't know whether it actually happened.

 

[stealth]

Yes, and the paraphrasing you chose to do isn't acurate.

Hey, whatever, defend the act. If that makes you feel good defend it.

in no way shape or form is he defending the act