Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
That's what I don't get either.aikemirv;1243477 said:Tell me any reason why he would preface the response with "he was aggravating me".
That's what I don't get either.aikemirv;1243477 said:Tell me any reason why he would preface the response with "he was aggravating me".
theogt;1243490 said:I've explained this to you in multiple threads now. You can keep ignoring the explanation.
As I stated in the other thread, it is one possible explanation. It's a perfectly reasonable one, at that. Whether it is the correct one or not, we'll never know. Because that perfectly reasonable explanation exists, however, it's useless to claim he needs to fined or not, unless you know the truth. Because you don't know the truth, you can't claim that he needs to fined, much less suspended.Doomsday101;1243497 said:You have explained your version of it but most of us saw what he said. Now all of a sudden it was an accident. Same old same old, TO defender to the rescue and to hell of what he said right after the fact. Now he wants to change some of the story BS.
He said he's aware of the action and that it will be strong?superpunk;1243508 said:Reading this thread, looks like both possibilities exist, Bill just said the league will take action, and that he's aware of what it is, and that it will be strong.
So whatever.
superpunk;1243511 said:Bill also just said he wouldn't be suspended.
theogt;1243513 said:He said he's aware of the action and that it will be strong?
theogt;1243513 said:He said he's aware of the action and that it will be strong?
That seems pretty hefty for not having film of the incident and it being one man's word against another's.superpunk;1243556 said:NFLN said it is a 35k fine. No suspension.
theogt;1243559 said:That seems pretty hefty for not having film of the incident and it being one man's word against another's.
Maybe that is the case. Or maybe they never got film of it and decided to fine him anyway. I'd imagine ESPN would be doing everything humanly possible to get their hands on film. If it's available, they'll get it.stealth;1243575 said:they were gonna review the "coaches" film so maybe they did see something in it. I imagine we will never know, and now we can all argue some more and some will say that the fine amount clearly shows he did it and meant it.
superpunk;1243556 said:NFLN said it is a 35k fine. No suspension.
No suspension was warranted.superpunk;1243556 said:NFLN said it is a 35k fine. No suspension.
Hostile;1243600 said:No suspension was warranted.
iceberg;1243612 said:$35k is a bit excessive also.
good god, how much of our own population doesn't even make $35k a year.
we pay far too much attention and $ to the athlete.
stealth;1243620 said:lol complete tangeant and off topic but imagine if we paid teachers like we paid athletes.