erod
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,788
- Reaction score
- 64,219
I'm not suggesting, nor do I practice, a fast-food intensive diet. I'm just pointing out that you can make small adjustments to your eating and avoid the 1,200-calorie per meal mistakes that lead to serious obesity. There are a lot of people that eat 5,000 calories a day, and they didn't even eat all that much food. Those are the folks that can benefit seriously by just making a better "bad" choice.gmoney112;4633772 said:You spend far more money on fast food than anyone who's actually dieting seriously. A healthy diet is cheap.
And yes, by basic arithmetic then if calorie expenditure > calorie intake then you will lose weight. However, unless you're getting blood tested then you have no idea how "healthy" your diet changes are actually, and if you're eating egg mcmuffins and chik-fil-a then chances are you're damaging your lipid levels, blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, insulin resistance, and digestion just for the sake of losing a few pounds. You can lose weight and actually do more damage than good, hence the advice given for maintaining a "healthy" lifestyle, and that does not involve planning your diets around fast food menu choices.
You can even eat pretty healthy at times. The grilled chicken sandwich at Chick-fil-a with a fruit cup instead of fries is quite healthy compared to the average lunch Americans eat. And it's only about 340 calories, and it's not damaging your blood levels.
Once serious weight loss starts to occur - 20 pounds or more - a lot of people start to reach for truly healthy options, but that's hard for a lot of people to do on Day 1.
Again, that's all I was saying. I didn't mean to attack nutritional science as an institution.
