I see one 8M to 12M type player over two or three 4M guys.
I think that's our preference, too. Though, if the price tag is too high, I could very easily see us reverting to trying to upgrade a DL position or two marginally and just build a better and deeper quality rotation. Thats actually what Jason indicated the plan was for the DL right after the season ended. I just think the availability of a young 15 sack guy at your position of greatest need has to open your eyes a bit to the possibilities.
But we ware going to have to pay these OLs here in a year or three, so we can't go nuts. We've got to be sure that anybody we're committing to long-term like that is going to add that sort of value. Otherwise, I wouldn't risk it.
Then again, I'm not in the all-in-while-we-have-Romo camp. I'd much prefer to just run the organization the smartest way possible and to rely on the counts to find and the coaches to develop the players we need. I don't mind stretching a bit for the opportunity, but as a general principle, there's too much that can go wrong in any one season to bet the farm on it and hope it pans out. Better to be sniffing around the fringes for many years for those chances to make a real run and to take advantage of that when it presents itself. We're right there. If we just stay the course and address the pass rush and develop the QB position we can contend.