Fuzzy Thoughts at GB 2016

[mattjames2010]

It's hard arguing with a wall. You didn't like how he went in to Lambeau and whipped Aaron Rodgers? Aaron freaking Rodgers was whipped by a 4th round rookie from Mississippi State. You don't like dealing in the factual world do you? In the factual world, Dak went in and had a 117 QBR with 3 TDs and 1 INT. How he got there is not as relevant as him actually getting there. NO one cares how New York won the Super Bowl, it's just a win. When you win, and somebody comes in and tries to discredit the win, they are known as trolls. You my friend, are a troll.

Aaron Rodgers, the guy everyone is beating up on right now because he doesn't look like the Aaron Rodgers of old? QBR's are simply raw statistics, same as they were for RGIII and Kirk Cousins. I actually watch games, analyze, and come away with opinions.

Try again.

 

[Clove]

Clove seems desperate for attention. The backhanded insults and calling others trolls is probably the best part.

If people want to discuss something other than the QBs I am down but the QB discussion is off the rails and I am done with it.

I have nothing personal against you, if you're going to put up an assessment of Cowboys players, do it fairly.

 

[Clove]

Aaron Rodgers, the guy everyone is beating up on right now because he doesn't look like the Aaron Rodgers of old? QBR's are simply raw statistics, same as they were for RGIII and Kirk Cousins. I actually watch games, analyze, and come away with opinions.

Try again.

You know, that guy who won a Super Bowl.

 

[NEODOG]

Aaron Rodgers, the guy everyone is beating up on right now because he doesn't look like the Aaron Rodgers of old? QBR's are simply raw statistics, same as they were for RGIII and Kirk Cousins. I actually watch games, analyze, and come away with opinions.

Try again.

Not trying to stir....but using this logic could make a better case to keep Dak. Romo had a terrible stat line in '15, though we were 3-1.......he looked very much not Romo-ish

 

[T-RO]

Just seems like Mr Fuzzy has a biased against Dak Prescott. I'll promise you that if Romo had the same game, all he would talk about is how wonderful Romo played and how we're lucky to have him.

No bias that I read. It seems that you are the one having an issue being objective.

You think a young quarterback has no areas of improvement or can't have a bad game? It's you with the problem and from your hysterical and repetitive posts I worry about your blood pressure.

Fuzzy is quite possibly the most even-handed and knowledgeable poster on this site. Chill.

Dak will be starting in week 7 and probably winning. And starting in week 8 and probably winning. Enjoy yourself. Geesh!

-----------
Update: If the mods don't give Clove a time-out... I'll have to find somewhere else to chat.

Clove: "smell like a Romo lover" ?!?

What does that smell like exactly? What a loser and bigot.

 

[skinsscalper]

Let's see what I made up

Let's do that:

I still can't get over this. Dak had a bad game?

This was NEVER said in the OP. Not once. Made up.

My criticism to him is that instead of leading with the positive points of Dak Prescott, all he does is tears the guy down.

Another complete fabrication. He gave a chronological analysis of Dak's play. Made up.

You do understand that ALL QUARTERBACKS make mistakes right? You do know this right? I'm just wondering because you act as if he lost the game

Another line of ********. No one, to a man in this thread, has acted as if he lost the game. Made up.

If he's going to do a statistical analyst of a QB, then do the ENTIRE THING. If you only talk about his negatives, you're being an ***hole on purpose.

This is the biggest made up line of crap in the entire thread. He DID do the entire thing (good and bad). The bolded part is the best. You either can't read or you made that entire line up. We know you can read, and now we know that you're full of ****. Made up.

I'm sorry I owned you. Bye now

This is the best one. You've fallen farther and farther down the rabbit hole of stupidity and culminated with this gem when it has now was demonstrated over and over that you're full of **** and had only this as your response. Made up.

You must be a Romo lover, smells like it.

Then there's this. You, at this point, have completely been slapped around so you immediately change the subject because you can no longer defend your incoherent rambling and string of blatant lies. You're a fraud and a waste of time. Really, stick to game threads. It's a job devoid of any thought and you can type fast. This thread only proves that you can type faster than you can think. Now, in the true nature of one that is prolific at typing, go grab someone a cup of coffee and shut up.

 

[mattjames2010]

Not trying to stir....but using this logic could make a better case to keep Dak. Romo had a terrible stat line in '15, though we were 3-1.......he looked very much not Romo-ish

Romo played a whole 3 and a half games last year. Against Giants, he had two tipped passes go for an INT, three TDs. Against the Eagles, he got injured. He returned weeks later rusty, and threw 2 INTs against the Dolphins but showed what made him great on a few drives (First game we won since he got injured) - He then had a short week and played a team that lost 2 games last year.

Not enough at all to judge him on.

 

[Trouty]

Really enjoyed the original post and thought it was fair to Dak, but I must say that Clove's fervent defense of our rookie QB is inspiring. Reminiscent of the legendary Mike Gundy.

"Come after ME, I'm a man, I'm 40!"

Lmao!!!! I have no idea how I have never seen that epic rant. Thanks for posting that, Undisputed!! Everyone needs to watch that!!! Lol!

 

[Clove]

No bias that I read. It seems that you are the one having an issue being objective.

You think a young quarterback has no areas of improvement or can't have a bad game? It's you with the problem and from your hysterical and repetitive posts I worry about your blood pressure.

Fuzzy is quite possibly the most even-handed and knowledgeable poster on this site. Chill.

Dak will be starting in week 7 and probably winning. And starting in week 8 and probably winning. Enjoy yourself. Geesh!

-----------
Update: If the mods don't give Clove a time-out... I'll have to find somewhere else to chat.

Clove: "smell like a Romo lover" ?!?

What does that smell like exactly? What a loser and bigot.

Tell me what you thought he did bad in this game, and I can list about 32 QBs who've done the same thing at some point during the year, if not every game. He acts as if Dak was just slinging the ball all over the field and wasn't hitting anyone, and that's just not true.

Do you think I saw something different from what he saw? He was so inaccurate that day. Really? Looks like we watched two different games because he was inaccurate on a very few throws and money on the rest. That's what I saw.

 

[Fla Cowpoke]

I still can't get over this. Dak had a bad game? Really? I mean, it wasn't perfect, but it was by far NOT a bad game. He hit his out routes, his deep routes, his screens, his slants, he hit every throw in the book. Did he miss a few, yes. Please tell me what QB in the history of the NFL hasn't missed a few during a game? Oh yeah, what did he do?

A rookie 4th round pick went in to Lambeau field, no Dez Bryant. Let that sink in for a moment. NO DEZ BRYANT. Went in to LAMBEAU FIELD, and went toe to toe with an MVP QB in Aaron Rodgers. Lead his team to 5 scoring drives, TDs and beat Green Bay and all you can talk about are some silly incompletions? You guys have lost touch with what it's like to be a winner.

The team Romo had around him was nowhere near as talented as this team is offensively, and the Green Bay team of this year is nowhere as good defensively. They were without their top 3 CB's for most of the game.

 

[waldoputty]

@FuzzyLumpkins , about about players.
I was pretty disappointed with Butler dropping the long pass.
What is your opinion of Butler in the last few games?

About Free, do you think Green can play better, if he ever can stay healthy?

Nzeocha, why do you think we are not seeing him?

 

[Clove]

Let's do that:



This was NEVER said in the OP. Not once. Made up.




Another complete fabrication. He gave a chronological analysis of Dak's play. Made up.



Another line of bull****. No one, to a man in this thread, has acted as if he lost the game. Made up.




This is the biggest made up line of crap in the entire thread. He DID do the entire thing (good and bad). The bolded part is the best. You either can't read or you made that entire line up. We know you can read, and now we know that you're full of ****. Made up.




This is the best one. You've fallen farther and farther down the rabbit hole of stupidity and culminated with this gem when it has now was demonstrated over and over that you're full of **** and had only this as your response. Made up.


Then there's this. You, at this point, have completely been slapped around so you immediately change the subject because you can no longer defend your incoherent rambling and string of blatant lies. You're a fraud and a waste of time. Really, stick to game threads. It's a job devoid of any thought and you can type fast. This thread only proves that you can type faster than you can think. Now, in the true nature of one that is prolific at typing, go grab someone a cup of coffee and shut up.

Everything in this post is elementary. I'll put it this way. Dak Prescott won the game. That's what he did, he won the game with his throws, with his defense, with his offensive line, with his running game, and with his kicker. His team and him, won the game. If that's not enough for you, then **** off. With all due respect.

 

[Clove]

The team Romo had around him was nowhere near as talented as this team is offensively, and the Green Bay team of this year is nowhere as good defensively. They were without their top 3 CB's for most of the game.

So what are you saying then? You're saying that Dak's not very good because his team is superior than anything Romo's ever had? Because if you're saying this, I would remind you that Dak did not have Dez Bryant, did not have Mo Claibourne for most of the game, did not have his other end (the guy who's suspended) did not have Orlando Scandrick, and is, a rookie 6th game ever played in the NFL, in Lambeau field. You guys want this kid to be John Elway right off the bat.

 

[skinsscalper]

Everything in this post is elementary. I'll put it this way. Dak Prescott won the game. That's what he did, he won the game with his throws, with his defense, with his offensive line, with his running game, and with his kicker. His team and him, won the game. If that's not enough for you, then **** off. With all due respect.

Another made up line of ********. That was never alluded to by anyone, including myself.

I also noticed that you didn't address a single thing that you made up. Shocking. You're a fraud. Absolutely worthless drivel. With no false veil of any respect at all. You simply don't deserve any.

 

[jday]

I stand by what I said, and if you're offended by it, go cry in the corner. The guy made about 5 bad throws, the rest were either on purpose, or good to great throws. If he's going to do a statistical analyst of a QB, then do the ENTIRE THING. If you only talk about his negatives, you're being an ***hole on purpose.

Wow. You are completely missing the point of this. Fuzzy is doing us a huge solid for providing this information. He had to watch this game a few times armed with all 22, I imagine. He left out Dak's positives because there is not a single person that is a member of this site who is unaware of what Dak did well...not one. Due to the amount of ground he had to cover, he didn't state the obvious. Most fans follow the ball. Fuzz may even do that on his first watch. But after that it is pretty much everywhere the ball is not...which means lots of time rewinding and watching for foot placement, hand placement, leverage, counters, etc. Lots of time. Then writing this. Time. Then contributing for free one of the best in-depth scouting reports you will find on the net; which by their very nature should be unbiased and delivered devoid of emotion. Otherwise their credibility suffers.

 

[Clove]

Another made up line of bull****. That was never alluded to by anyone, including myself.

I also noticed that you didn't address a single thing that you made up. Shocking. You're a fraud. Absolutely worthless drivel. With no false veil of any respect at all. You simply don't deserve any.

Tell me one thing in all of my posts that were false. Everything I said was either factual, or the truth. He did lead with the bad parts of Dak Prescott, he never mentioned all the good throws Dak made except one, and that's what set me off. He acted as if the team around him won the game and Dak was just there. This is not conjecture, these are my opinions based on the information I saw with my own eyes.

If you can name one false thing I've said, I'll stop posting right now. Good luck.

 

[skinsscalper]

Tell me one thing in all of my posts that were false. Everything I said was either factual, or the truth. He did lead with the bad parts of Dak Prescott, he never mentioned all the good throws Dak made except one, and that's what set me off. He acted as if the team around him won the game and Dak was just there. This is not conjecture, these are my opinions based on the information I saw with my own eyes.

If you can name one false thing I've said, I'll stop posting right now. Good luck.

I gave you an entire list. Log off, forever!

 

[waldoputty]

Wow. You are completely missing the point of this. Fuzzy is doing us a huge solid for providing this information. He had to watch this game a few times armed with all 22, I imagine. He left out Dak's positives because there is not a single person that is a member of this site who is unaware of what Dak did well...not one. Due to the amount of ground he had to cover, he didn't state the obvious. Most fans follow the ball. Fuzz may even do that on his first watch. But after that it is pretty much everywhere the ball is not...which means lots of time rewinding and watching for foot placement, hand placement, leverage, counters, etc. Lots of time. Then writing this. Time. Then contributing for free one of the best in-depth scouting reports you will find on the net; which by their very nature should be unbiased and delivered devoid of emotion. Otherwise their credibility suffers.

Fuzzy is doing all of us a service here.
Where would you get this type of scouting analysis?
Please do not turn this thread into an angry argument over Dak/Romo.
Those arguments really belong in the QB zone.
Otherwise, it is really unfair to Fuzzy who did all that work.
This thread has been hijacked from game analysis to Dak/Romo.

We are all fans of the same team.
Lets just get along without having to 'ignore' when there could be fun discussions to be had.

 

[Clove]

Wow. You are completely missing the point of this. Fuzzy is doing us a huge solid for providing this information. He had to watch this game a few times armed with all 22, I imagine. He left out Dak's positives because there is not a single person that is a member of this site who is unaware of what Dak did well...not one. Due to the amount of ground he had to cover, he didn't state the obvious. Most fans follow the ball. Fuzz may even do that on his first watch. But after that it is pretty much everywhere the ball is not...which means lots of time rewinding and watching for foot placement, hand placement, leverage, counters, etc. Lots of time. Then writing this. Time. Then contributing for free one of the best in-depth scouting reports you will find on the net; which by their very nature should be unbiased and delivered devoid of emotion. Otherwise their credibility suffers.

I get this. But I'd like to know what he did right. Is that alright with you? You went on and on and on with how wonderful Zeke was, was it too much to mention anything our STARTING ROOKIE QB DID?

Okay, I'll do it then.

Dak played admirably Sunday afternoon. After a shaky start in the 1st half, he suddenly started to figure some things out. Started with a nice hand off to Lucky around the left side that picked up 25 yards. Followed by a sweet pass to Lucky, just good enough to give Lucky a chance to actually catch the ball and not fumble around with it. He then hit Witten on a sweet out route under heavy pressure to give us the first down. Then another sweet pass to Williams to get us in scoring position. Followed by one of the most beautifully placed balls in the end zone away from the defender you will ever see.

How hard was that?

 

[jday]

Fuzzy is doing all of us a service here.
Where would you get this type of scouting analysis?
Please do not turn this thread into an angry argument over Dak/Romo.
Those arguments really belong in the QB zone.
Otherwise, it is really unfair to Fuzzy who did all that work.
This thread has been hijacked from game analysis to Dak/Romo.

We are all fans of the same team.
Lets just get along without having to 'ignore' when there could be fun discussions to be had.

I'm confused. Are you saying I'm doing that?