No, but that could change.
A lot of these guys have skins on the wall so where is the disconnect? I think Garrett has to make a major leap with his learning curve because his process is not getting it done. He needs to step outside the box and devise a plan (with his coordinators) that will get the most out of each individual player that suits up on Sundays. First step: prepare a plan for the draft….
IMHO it is in being forward-thinking not worrying about skins.
I am over 40 and work in IT. What was utilized even 10 years ago to run IT systems is a dinosaur.
Being an expert 10 years ago is largely meaningless today.
Football is not that different.
You need to stay abreast of the college game and what works there.
You need to understand what athletes are running in high schools because you will eventually see those guys as pros.
Things like tempo and pick plays and width plays are all too common yet well underutilized or non-existent in Dallas.
Fish likes to refer to Walsh having invented the WR in motion in the late 60s.
What we need is not to run a 1980 Walsh system but to have a Bill Walsh type innovator.
And defensively it is pretty much common knowledge you can not win running a pure tampa 2 anymore.
Nothing wrong with a 4-3 base but truth is good schemes are agnostic and utilize 3, 4 and 5 DL at different times.
Very few line up the same play after play and try to beat you.
The thing for me with Garrett is does he have an offense? I don't think so.
I think he's run other people's offenses without ever creating his own philosophy or spin on anything.
So maybe we could see some of that this coming season and maybe that gets him an extension and starts something special.
The problem with merely emulating what works is while you are installing what works other teams are preparing to beat it.