Garrett's 3 year plan

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
You are the embarrassment friend. When your narrative blows up you have to write a new one. Teams lose games on the road to where they are headed. You were wrong, just too stinking proud to admit it. This isn't about Garrett or Jerry or the team. It's about you still having to be right, even though you have been dead wrong. Carry on with the narrative. I'm not buying. You haven't been in the know...you have just been wrong. I'm happy you were.

My narrative has been the same throughout the process. There is no right or wrong here. That is what you aren't getting. The minute you can answer these simple questions in detail, the minute you will get what a majority of people here are saying....a) did JG's process that you are proudly touting consist of him becoming HC/OC, having it ripped away twice, and in the long run have him as a figure head HC while others ran the offense? and b) did JG's process consist of a learning curve where he has "a" happen, along with losing games because of his clock management and inability to call the offense. Along with this was it part of the process to miss the playoffs all those years because of those games and decisions regarding the running game...so much so that the owner called him to the mat on it? AND for his teams to consistently come out unprepared in 1st halfs only to have furious comeback attempts int he 4th quarter. That was ALL part of the 3 year plan?

AGAIN, the reality is that JG had an IDEA of what he wanted to do. I'm assuming it consisted of being HC/OC, running the offense his way, having a team get younger, have guys be accountable, etc. PART of this plan has worked its way through the last 3 years. BUT a lot of what is going on is Jerry due to cap restrictions and really a yearly reassessment with JG and others. The cap made us unload high priced, aging vets. The yearly coordinator shuffle was to take the OC position off JG's plate and to improve the D. That is the truth. Answer the questions and have a real football conversation.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
There is no need for all the personal insults, especially at this time.

If it continues, then you guys will just have to take some time away from CZ to cool off.

:cool:

Apologies!I'll stick to the narrative of wanting football questions answered.
 

rcaldw

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,067
Reaction score
1,181
My narrative has been the same throughout the process. There is no right or wrong here. That is what you aren't getting. The minute you can answer these simple questions in detail, the minute you will get what a majority of people here are saying....a) did JG's process that you are proudly touting consist of him becoming HC/OC, having it ripped away twice, and in the long run have him as a figure head HC while others ran the offense? and b) did JG's process consist of a learning curve where he has "a" happen, along with losing games because of his clock management and inability to call the offense. Along with this was it part of the process to miss the playoffs all those years because of those games and decisions regarding the running game...so much so that the owner called him to the mat on it? AND for his teams to consistently come out unprepared in 1st halfs only to have furious comeback attempts int he 4th quarter. That was ALL part of the 3 year plan?

AGAIN, the reality is that JG had an IDEA of what he wanted to do. I'm assuming it consisted of being HC/OC, running the offense his way, having a team get younger, have guys be accountable, etc. PART of this plan has worked its way through the last 3 years. BUT a lot of what is going on is Jerry due to cap restrictions and really a yearly reassessment with JG and others. The cap made us unload high priced, aging vets. The yearly coordinator shuffle was to take the OC position off JG's plate and to improve the D. That is the truth. Answer the questions and have a real football conversation.

The only reason I don't write a book in response to you is that your scenarios have all been answered thousands of times. They have been answered in detail on this forum and long before you saw the light. :) I just don't have the energy or desire to keep doing it when you will tell your own story regardless. So, as I said, carry on. You like to think you're in the majority. You, in fact, are in that group trying to figure out how we are 5-1 with a head coach you haven't respected, and how you can re-tell it in a way so that now the "organization" gets the credit :) Go for it :) Garrett has done a great job here and will be here a long time. Deservedly so.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
Wrong it what? Facts are 3rd and short when Garrett was calling plays was a passing down, not run. So yes we struggled because we passed.

If you look at Murray's history his total average is 5 yards a carry even without a dominant oline. Which means that we have had a running game all these years but failed to exploit it.

Yes...facts that people fail to point out and ignore.


There are two reasons why we had such a bad 3rd down conversion. 1st. We were pass oriented even on 3rd and short. Nothing bothered me more when we had Romo in shotgun and 3rd and short and we passed it. You can thank your pass happy head coach for that.

Secondly, because we were such a pass oriented team last year even though we could have ran it, we got into many 3rd and long situations. Thats because he do nothing but pass, pass, pass and we ended up 3rd and long. Nothing proves the case more on why we had such bad 3rd down conversion and thats because we passed the ball instead of running it. Once again, you can thank the head coach for being so pass happy.

As for the 12 personnel which you keep referring to......it was nothing more than us trying to copy the Patriots. Do you really think that we were going to run out of that formation when Escobar can even block for the love of God? Seriously.....you need to stop referring to the 12 personnel because doesn't prove a thing that we wanted to run the ball. It just proves that we invested in TEs that could catch the ball out of that position.

You're being ridiculous. And we didn't always run on 3rd and short...again...because when we indicated run we'd get blown off the ball. That's why we ran the draw so much.

Look at that last touchdown drive versus the Seahawks. We lined up in jumbo set 3 straight times and ran the same play the last two times. We could NEVER have done that last year.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
You are like many other posters. Stay on point. Parcells is not part of this.

I said. Garrett gets some credit.
Yes, Jerry is getting credit before Garrett. Jerry is teaching himself. On the job training, wayyyyy before Garrett.

Stay blind.

Stay football ignorant.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
Contrary to popular belief I don't hate Garrett. But the real reason we are running more is because of Linehan.

Except if you look to the 2nd half of last year....your argument starts to disintegrate...not that you've presented much facts...
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
Again, you are showing your tail. People like you are the ones who ruin this board. I wasn't wrong because for the past few years his mistakes are what kept us out of the playoffs. How is that so hard to see when its been acknowledged by most in the know? It doesn't mean he didn't have a certain plan, but it also didn't mean his plan consisted of blowing games and having his GM/Owner take his control away and give it to someone else. Do you see that? The fact that he started by being HC and OC and over time its morphed into him being just a HC while others do the play calling? That's called transitioning into the right model, not a master plan of his. If you are too dense not to see that, then you really have no hope. Under your way of thinking you have been wrong for 4 years and right for 6 games. The reality is JG came in with his way of WANTING to do things. Part of that may have been getting younger. BUT his initial foray and process consisted of him thinking he could be HC/OC and that it would stay that way. Jerry took this away...twice. So the reality is, JG didn't have a 3 year plan that has gone to perfection. He lost many of its components. Please stop embarrassing yourself. It takes away from what the team is accomplishing. I could sit here and say that "X coach is going to be great one day" and for years be wrong and then the one year he does well claim "See, you were wrong." Anyone can do that. But it doesn't mean that the other years didn't happen. Please learn.

The smartest, most logical and best assessment of what has happened so far is that JG wasn't a good coach or coordinator to start. His plan wasn't even going that well. Over 3 years he learned on the job... and through Jerry and others they found a combination of what he does best that fits with other coordinators. Trial and error. He teaches a philosophy. Others coach and manage. BUT 6 games is a small sample size. As I've said, I've seen this in other places. Lets pump the brakes and see how the season plays out.

Jerry has said that when Garrett was hired Jason wanted to hire an OC but Jerry demanded that he do both, so get your fact straight before insulting someone.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
It was supposed to be Garrett's offense, but Callahan said it was “the Cowboys offense.”

The end result was another 8-8 finish by the Cowboys and disappointment with Callahan and the overall feeling of the offense.

While Tyron Smith, DeMarco Murray and Dez Bryant became Pro Bowlers under Callahan/Garrett other parts of the offense faltered. Miles Austin regressed due to injuries. Gavin Escobar was the second-round pick who didn't play enough at tight end. Third down conversions slipped from 43.9 percent in 2012 to 35 percent last year.

A change was needed, so Garrett snagged his buddy in Linehan. He ran the Detroit Lions offense in 2013, which finished third overall in the league at 408.8 yards per game.

Garrett kept his hand in the offense last season despite his plan of letting Callahan run the show. Now, Garrett is supposed to take a step away from things and let Linehan control the offense.

Garrett is supposed to be more relaxed with this arrangement. It's interesting to see, considering he's in the final year of his contract.

But maybe Garrett is in more control now than ever before. He's got his close friend running the offense in comparison to Callahan.

“We have a lot of confidence in our offensive coaching staff,” Garrett said. “I'm certainly going to still be connected with them and communicate very closely with them on how we are doing things and share some of my thoughts on it. Hear some of their thoughts and decide what's best for our football team. But I have a lot of confidence in Scott Linehan, a lot of confidence in Bill Callahan and the whole offensive staff to do things the way we want to do them.”

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4726202/garrett-explains-scott-linehan
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
The only reason I don't write a book in response to you is that your scenarios have all been answered thousands of times. They have been answered in detail on this forum and long before you saw the light. :) I just don't have the energy or desire to keep doing it when you will tell your own story regardless. So, as I said, carry on. You like to think you're in the majority. You, in fact, are in that group trying to figure out how we are 5-1 with a head coach you haven't respected, and how you can re-tell it in a way so that now the "organization" gets the credit :) Go for it :) Garrett has done a great job here and will be here a long time. Deservedly so.

I don't know you from Adam but its tough to have a normal football conversation with someone who doesn't engage. You've never answered the question. You've gleamed them. If its cut and paste, go for it. I want to know. The fact that you aren't answering it speaks volumes. I practice law for a living and I feel like that if this was a courtroom you'd have a jury shaking their head at you thinking "why won't he just answer the questions vs deflecting." I also want you to try and read people's posts before shooting off answers with no responses. I've told my Garrett story many times and how it transitioned out. I used to sit here and talk about how I loved that he made guys wear suits to the game ,etc because we needed the discipline. That changed. It changed because I saw the reality of it. The questions I asked above speak volumes about what happened and they are facts. There is a difference between respect and job performance. I respect Garrett just like I have many coaches like Campo and others along the way, I respect them as men. It doesn't mean I have to eat up everything about them and think they are great coaches. Garrett's process wasn't an exact plan, plain and simple. I've given him partial credit. In multiple responses in this thread you've not expressed ONE football assertion regarding how JG's plan came to fruition or answered any of the questions presented. The chain letter has been "Attack messenger, say I'm right and you're wrong, say I've already talked about these things." It's not attacking you personally but as a poster I'd sure like more than "At 5-1, after 4 years of heartache, I'm right." Right now the team is doing well, but its truly disingenuous to say that what happened the last 4 years was EXACTLY the plan JG had in mind and that it came to fruition.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,448
Reaction score
33,407
There are posters so invested in hating Garrett that any fact would be doubted. Any positive will get moved to someone else and all negatives get laid at his feet.

It is laughable.

Linehan is not the reason we are running more. He is a career 60/40 pass play caller. He just became the savior that suddenly went to 50/50 because some would rather stick a shotgun in their mouth and pull the trigger than give Garrett any credit.

As for that 2012 draft, it was a weak OL draft and I bet that the same ones complaining about the "plan" would be yelling to high heaven had we reached for OL instead of sticking to our board.

Laughable are posters who refused to see the problems with the team for the last 15+ years and made every excuse imaginable. When the FO finally did what MANY of us had been saying for years ie build the OL , these posters are calling out others
 

rcaldw

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,067
Reaction score
1,181
I don't know you from Adam but its tough to have a normal football conversation with someone who doesn't engage. You've never answered the question. You've gleamed them. If its cut and paste, go for it. I want to know. The fact that you aren't answering it speaks volumes. I practice law for a living and I feel like that if this was a courtroom you'd have a jury shaking their head at you thinking "why won't he just answer the questions vs deflecting." I also want you to try and read people's posts before shooting off answers with no responses. I've told my Garrett story many times and how it transitioned out. I used to sit here and talk about how I loved that he made guys wear suits to the game ,etc because we needed the discipline. That changed. It changed because I saw the reality of it. The questions I asked above speak volumes about what happened and they are facts. There is a difference between respect and job performance. I respect Garrett just like I have many coaches like Campo and others along the way, I respect them as men. It doesn't mean I have to eat up everything about them and think they are great coaches. Garrett's process wasn't an exact plan, plain and simple. I've given him partial credit. In multiple responses in this thread you've not expressed ONE football assertion regarding how JG's plan came to fruition or answered any of the questions presented. The chain letter has been "Attack messenger, say I'm right and you're wrong, say I've already talked about these things." It's not attacking you personally but as a poster I'd sure like more than "At 5-1, after 4 years of heartache, I'm right." Right now the team is doing well, but its truly disingenuous to say that what happened the last 4 years was EXACTLY the plan JG had in mind and that it came to fruition.

I have already explained why I don't engage, and it has nothing to do with lack of evidence or strength of argument...it has to do with zero desire to reintroduce evidence that has been presented ad nauseum with the same results every time. BZ already shot down one of your foundational arguments and my money says you won't acknowledge that he's right. I agree the jury would be shaking it's head but for an entirely different reason than you imagine. As I said, carry on. You don't have to convince me. You have to convince those who will listen to you on this subject.
 

rcaldw

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,067
Reaction score
1,181
Laughable are posters who refused to see the problems with the team for the last 15+ years and made every excuse imaginable. When the FO finally did what MANY of us had been saying for years ie build the OL , these posters are calling out others

You and Houston frog are on the same page.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Right now the team is doing well, but its truly disingenuous to say that what happened the last 4 years was EXACTLY the plan JG had in mind and that it came to fruition.

Again. Give Garrett credit. Yes.

Jones hired how many different coordinators and assistants over the last 4 years??



it's not even close.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
I have already explained why I don't engage, and it has nothing to do with lack of evidence or strength of argument...it has to do with zero desire to reintroduce evidence that has been presented ad nauseum with the same results every time. BZ already shot down one of your foundational arguments and my money says you won't acknowledge that he's right. I agree the jury would be shaking it's head but for an entirely different reason than you imagine. As I said, carry on. You don't have to convince me. You have to convince those who will listen to you on this subject.

I rest my case. You filled out the "Mad-Libs" fill in the blank form because you can't answer simple questions. I'm not engaging BZ. I'm engaging someone who says outright that JG had a process from Day 1, was great at building through the process and now in Year 4 is seeing all of his master plan work. That is what you are saying. You are just ignoring the games, the turnover at coaching, the constant change in his own status as HC/OC, etc. That isn't a master plan. That isn't a blueprint. Give him credit for staying the course on discipline and message. But to act like the last 3 years was a PLAN when we've been unprepared, out coached and had Jerry playing musical coordinator is just making up a scenario. It's really an easy concept. No one in their right mind would say JG was running this show for 4 years and that Jerry and others were obvious to it when they made their statements at the end of last year.
 

rcaldw

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,067
Reaction score
1,181
I rest my case. You filled out the "Mad-Libs" fill in the blank form because you can't answer simple questions. I'm not engaging BZ. I'm engaging someone who says outright that JG had a process from Day 1, was great at building through the process and now in Year 4 is seeing all of his master plan work. That is what you are saying. You are just ignoring the games, the turnover at coaching, the constant change in his own status as HC/OC, etc. That isn't a master plan. That isn't a blueprint. Give him credit for staying the course on discipline and message. But to act like the last 3 years was a PLAN when we've been unprepared, out coached and had Jerry playing musical coordinator is just making up a scenario. It's really an easy concept. No one in their right mind would say JG was running this show for 4 years and that Jerry and others were obvious to it when they made their statements at the end of last year.

Enjoy the perspective. You win in the court room of HoustonFrog. ...gavel sound
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
Again. Give Garrett credit. Yes.

Jones hired how many different coordinators and assistants over the last 4 years??





it's not even close.


Exactly!

Let's say I said, "I have a 3 year plan to build my dream home for my kids and family to enjoy and here is the blueprint" and it was a 2 story modern home with all kinds of cool rooms. Year 1 into the build the developer says the city won't zone me for a 2 story home. Not only that but the neighborhood doesn't allow the stone I want to use. So I hire a new architect to get around these things. Year 2 of the build and my wife says that the kitchen is too small and she and the architect build it out and take away part of the huge TV room I wanted. The developer comes to me in Years 2 and 3 and says we are over budget and we need to cut some of the cool gadgets and plusses I wanted. So the house finishes in Year 4 and I have this great sprawling ranch style house that my family and kids love. Was my goal to have a house my kids love? Yes. Was the house the 2 story modern home with the stone I wanted? No. Did I keep working and going through all the mistakes? Yes. Did my architect, wife and many others affect how the house was built? Yes.

That's reality. JG had a plan in his head. Did his master plan work over 3 years the way he planned it? No. Is everyone happy with where we are at now? Yes.
 
Last edited:

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Laughable are posters who refused to see the problems with the team for the last 15+ years and made every excuse imaginable. When the FO finally did what MANY of us had been saying for years ie build the OL , these posters are calling out others

I've yet to see a group of posters on the site who didn't see and weren't able to talk about problems with the team. I think there were a lot of discussions on those topics, weren't there? And the front office has been rebuilding the OL since Jason Garrett took over--something else I don't think any red-blooded Cowboy fan ever had a problem with since Jason released Gurode and Davis and went shopping for a new LT....it was both obvious and necessary.

The issue comes in in that a lot of posters weren't satisfied with the steps it took to get there. For example, they didn't like Callahan coming in and the move to the zone defense because they thought Houck was just as good. They didn't like taking fliers on guys like Ron Leary in CFA because they wanted to spend $60M in VFA on Carl Nicks. They didn't like the drafting of Frederick, or the hiring of Linehan in the first place. They've called the head coach a clown and a puppet and an idiot for years.

I can't speak for anybody but myself in this case, but then to flip around in the middle of the most impressive 5 game winning streak in recent years to try to turn around and argue that they were right all along and that little or none of the success is of Jason Garrett's doing just comes off as disingenuous or phony. Cowardly even, maybe? It's really hard not to react to that. Honestly, to the extent that it can stay within the obvious guidelines and that it doesn't detract significantly from the topic of the thread, I have a hard time blaming them. Actually, I have a hard time not joining in.

I'd agree, though, that it's not good karma for the long-standing positive posters to turn around at the first sign of really positive play and unleash a lot of emotional frustration at 'realists' right now. What goes around, comes around in the NFL, and there's going to be a lot of adversity still this season. Lots of opportunities for Jason to turn back into an idiot. And you can bet when that happens, we won't be talking about whether the offense is going through him or through Scott Linehan. It'll be obvious at that point that this is the HC's show, win or lose.
 

rcaldw

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,067
Reaction score
1,181
I've yet to see a group of posters on the site who didn't see and weren't able to talk about problems with the team. I think there were a lot of discussions on those topics, weren't there? And the front office has been rebuilding the OL since Jason Garrett took over--something else I don't think any red-blooded Cowboy fan ever had a problem with since Jason released Gurode and Davis and went shopping for a new LT....it was both obvious and necessary.

The issue comes in in that a lot of posters weren't satisfied with the steps it took to get there. For example, they didn't like Callahan coming in and the move to the zone defense because they thought Houck was just as good. They didn't like taking fliers on guys like Ron Leary in CFA because they wanted to spend $60M in VFA on Carl Nicks. They didn't like the drafting of Frederick, or the hiring of Linehan in the first place. They've called the head coach a clown and a puppet and an idiot for years.

I can't speak for anybody but myself in this case, but then to flip around in the middle of the most impressive 5 game winning streak in recent years to try to turn around and argue that they were right all along and that little or none of the success is of Jason Garrett's doing just comes off as disingenuous or phony. Cowardly even, maybe? It's really hard not to react to that. Honestly, to the extent that it can stay within the obvious guidelines and that it doesn't detract significantly from the topic of the thread, I have a hard time blaming them. Actually, I have a hard time not joining in.

I'd agree, though, that it's not good karma for the long-standing positive posters to turn around at the first sign of really positive play and unleash a lot of emotional frustration at 'realists' right now. What goes around, comes around in the NFL, and there's going to be a lot of adversity still this season. Lots of opportunities for Jason to turn back into an idiot. And you can bet when that happens, we won't be talking about whether the offense is going through him or through Scott Linehan. It'll be obvious at that point that this is the HC's show, win or lose.

Nice post and spot on. I just don't waste my time engaging it anymore. If we lose it will be Garrett, if we win it will be someone else. They will call it football knowledge. It's the farthest thing from it. Very few are honest enough just to admit they were wrong about something. I respect those folks.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I've yet to see a group of posters on the site who didn't see and weren't able to talk about problems with the team. I think there were a lot of discussions on those topics, weren't there? And the front office has been rebuilding the OL since Jason Garrett took over--something else I don't think any red-blooded Cowboy fan ever had a problem with since Jason released Gurode and Davis and went shopping for a new LT....it was both obvious and necessary.

The issue comes in in that a lot of posters weren't satisfied with the steps it took to get there. For example, they didn't like Callahan coming in and the move to the zone defense because they thought Houck was just as good. They didn't like taking fliers on guys like Ron Leary in CFA because they wanted to spend $60M in VFA on Carl Nicks. They didn't like the drafting of Frederick, or the hiring of Linehan in the first place. They've called the head coach a clown and a puppet and an idiot for years.

I can't speak for anybody but myself in this case, but then to flip around in the middle of the most impressive 5 game winning streak in recent years to try to turn around and argue that they were right all along and that little or none of the success is of Jason Garrett's doing just comes off as disingenuous or phony. Cowardly even, maybe? It's really hard not to react to that. Honestly, to the extent that it can stay within the obvious guidelines and that it doesn't detract significantly from the topic of the thread, I have a hard time blaming them. Actually, I have a hard time not joining in.

I'd agree, though, that it's not good karma for the long-standing positive posters to turn around at the first sign of really positive play and unleash a lot of emotional frustration at 'realists' right now. What goes around, comes around in the NFL, and there's going to be a lot of adversity still this season. Lots of opportunities for Jason to turn back into an idiot. And you can bet when that happens, we won't be talking about whether the offense is going through him or through Scott Linehan. It'll be obvious at that point that this is the HC's show, win or lose.

You nailed it. I have no issue with people being critical but for some to act like Garrett plays no part in the turn around to fit their own agenda is a bit much. If it was my call to make last season I would likely fired Jason because after 3 season we were still 8-8 and still missing post season. Jerry has stuck with Jason giving him this final year under contract and this team has responded. You bet Linehan and Marinnelli have played big parts and Jason has as well including the hiring of Linehan and the promoting of Marinnelli
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
You nailed it. I have no issue with people being critical but for some to act like Garrett plays no part in the turn around to fit their own agenda is a bit much. If it was my call to make last season I would likely fired Jason because after 3 season we were still 8-8 and still missing post season. Jerry has stuck with Jason giving him this final year under contract and this team has responded. You bet Linehan and Marinnelli have played big parts and Jason has as well including the hiring of Linehan and the promoting of Marinnelli

Doomsday, you are the closest poster I've seen to nailing what the reality of the situation is. Many wanted JG gone and there were actual fact based factors, as I've alluded to here, that led to this conclusion. His blueprint has not been followed to a T and every off season was filled with turnover and addition/subtractions that were more Jerry tinkering than blueprint. On top of it we were sitting in the same place. I've said it all along. I give JG full credit to having an IDEA of what he wanted and sticking to it. He has a hand in it. But the last 3 years were not perfectly planned. There wasn't a strategy like we saw in the early 90s where every year you could see a "step-up." This was a stew of people and ideas that came together and formed what we have now. That is all and it is great to be 5-1. The closest thing I can think regarding my feelings is the example I laid out right above regarding the house.
 
Top