BouncingCheese
Stay out of my Bidness
- Messages
- 1,704
- Reaction score
- 0
Carpenter and Fasano were BP picks.
khiladi;1588097 said:That is NOT what Jerry Jones said... He said that considering the benching of the QB Bledsoe, whom they paid a lot of money to start, it was considered throwing the season away. And that is all there is to it. The reason we even got Bledsoe, despite all the claims of Parcells having faith in Romo, is because of Parcells.
As for playing time - why is it so hard to believe that Parcells felt Romo had a future, but he needed to develop first. That's what Parcells said all along, and your hatred of Parcells can't override that.
Parcells felt the same about Henson.
And for more proof - look at the Giants. As with Romo, Parcells developed Hostetler for a number of years before moving him in to replace the veteran who had performed well for Parcells teams in the past.
It appears that, contrary to your words, history actually supports the idea that Parcells liked Romo.
khiladi;1588097 said:The reason we even got Bledsoe, despite all the claims of Parcells having faith in Romo, is because Romo wasn't ready to start at that point in his career
Dodger12;1588119 said:O.K., I'll bite.....Why? Because if Jerry loses 5 million on a cap friendly contract, it's throwing the season away? Bull. I may be critical of some things JJ does, but the man never equates spending or losing money to throwing the season away.
Jerry had the same reservations that allot of us had. That is, if we turn the keys over to an undrafted and unknown QB, that the season was in doubt. You're playing a game of semantics. BP was never forced into playing Romo. He could have played Bledsoe until the cows came home and many of us here, including myself, would have thought that he was our best chance to win and make the palyoffs, even with a questionable OL and Bledsoe's faults.
BouncingCheese;1588125 said:And I am pretty sure that BP didn't like Romo until Payton offered BP a second rounder for Romo, when he then probably caught on that Romo could be a legit commodity.
khiladi;1588127 said:They brought in Bledsoe because they didn't have a single veteran QB on the roster with any NFL game experience, and they were in the market for one. Bledsoe was the best one on the market at that time among the Kurt Warners and Brian Grieses, and he already knew the offense, making it a rather easy decision. They paid him a modest contract, and he accomplished what he was paid for ... provide a bridge
InmanRoshi;1588126 said:FTFY
You're hilarious !!! Keep entertaining me. Dance monkey !!! Dance !!!
Rallied may not be a strong enough verb. "By the sixth round that year, Sean was practically standing on the table, telling us to take Romo," former Cowboys player personnel director Larry Lacewell
InmanRoshi;1588132 said:Fixed that for you .. again.
You can thank me later.
InmanRoshi;1588128 said:So why didn't he cut Romo in the three previous training camps? Why did he give Romo preseason snaps with the starters in Year 3, before he was ever offered anything?
superpunk;1588145 said:It's times like this when I think of percyhoward's great words of wisdom.
The two stances of Parcells bashers are completely opposed to one another - namely, that he owes all his credit to his assistants, and that he stifles said assistants.
And so, depending on your hate level for the man, you'll attribute any possible success found by our organization to Jerry, or Ireland or Payton - and direct any possible blame to Parcells for bad picks, or bad coaching moves.
He owes all his credit to his assistants...
...who he won't allow to breathe.
InmanRoshi;1588146 said:Sean Payton didn't discover nobody. Everyone knew who Romo was. He was invited to the Combine and worked out in front of 32 NFL scouting departments. Everyone who halfway followed the draft knew who he was.
Again, without Parcells there is no Sean Payton in the Cowboys organization, so no matter how you put it without Bill Parcells there is no Tony Romo.
Now ..... Dance monkey, Dance !!!
superpunk;1588145 said:It's times like this when I think of percyhoward's great words of wisdom.
The two stances of Parcells bashers are completely opposed to one another - namely, that he owes all his credit to his assistants, and that he stifles said assistants.
And so, depending on your hate level for the man, you'll attribute any possible success found by our organization to Jerry, or Ireland or Payton - and direct any possible blame to Parcells for bad picks, or bad coaching moves.
He owes all his credit to his assistants...
...who he won't allow to breathe.
If he was gushing so much over Romo, why didn't we draft him rather than let him test the UDFA market?khiladi;1588147 said:Maybe because Sean Payton was all over Romo, gushing about him, forcing him to start his hand, and then suddenly asking Dallas that Romo be traded to him when coaching the Saints to start for his team....
InmanRoshi;1588149 said:Brillant.
peplaw06;1588155 said:If he was gushing so much over Romo, why didn't we draft him rather than let him test the UDFA market?