GimmeTheBall!
Junior College Transfer
- Messages
- 37,696
- Reaction score
- 18,043
:enough:
blindzebra;1585404 said:Under Campo we had years where almost half our cap was tied up in dead money...so not only did he pay for the over-spending Jerry did over the begging of Stephen not to, he paid for the Galloway trade as well.
But even with all that, Scrappy's teams were in most games...19 of his 33 losses were by 7 or less. His teams showed more heart than Tuna's did.
Parcells inherited a team with nowhere to go but up, and frankly I'd bet there are 10-20 guys Jerry could have hired that could have added talent and went 34-32.
GimmeTheBall!;1586226 said::enough:
igtmfo;1585961 said:Yup Larry Lacewell knows football accd to so many and I believe them, but his era as chief of college scouting is a wreck.
The Garretts look great right now and I think they'll continue to, but remember Jim Garrett, the daddy, touted Drew Hensen as, let me paraphrase: "more potential than Aikman" ... (look it up sorry I'm too lazy today ...) .. whoops there goes a (third?) pick ...
Our scouting in that era was the dregs. A few months after the first Super Bowl win of the JJ era, Jerry fired Bob Ackles, John Wooten and most importantly Dick Mansperger. A giant mistake, and the ultimate act of hubris by Jerry, and Jimmy too. If you don't believe me, read what Joel Buchsbaum said, link below. Oh apparently there was a guy named Smith too that was fired, I didn't remember him:
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/Commentary/Columns/2002/buchsbaum083002.htm
All that said, I hope Lacewell's office is as far away from Ireland's as possible.
You asked what we had that all those teams didn't. I gave an answer. Your response has nothing to do with that, or whether or not there are a plethora of idiots out there ready to do the job that Bill Parcells did.blindzebra;1586182 said:And I guess you missed the 34-32 record, zero division titles, 4 straight late season nose-dives and no play off wins, too, huh?
iceberg;1586171 said:i would buy this more *if*
the people who said this would give jones credit for "learning" and hiring a "real coach" when much of this crowd said he never would.
then - the fact he did hire a real coach and take a back seat - he proved he can and will learn. w/parcells gone - it's as if he never hired pacells and we've got the "old" jones w/o even giving him a chance to see if he *really* learned.
some people put jones in a no-win situation and regardless of what he does, the good things are an accident or attributed to someone else and the bad things ge way magnified and all heaped upon jones.
khiladi;1586058 said:What is your point?
The Dallas Cowboys are well under the salary cap.. they were NOT when Campo was there... further, the salary cap has consistently risen during Parcell's tenure, while still being under the cap...
I don't see what the relevance of your questions are... Sean Payton and Tubby SMith are kept examples of coaches who took their teams way farther than Parcells during his reign, in shorter time, with much less to work with...
to claim Parcells did something special and restored a team with a culture of losing is exxagerated hyperbole.. Campo had one dollar, Parcells had 100 dollars...
khiladi;1586055 said:Hoe about I make it easy on you?
Are you serious? Your considering the NFL pre-1993 as akin to the changes the league implemented after 1993? You got to be kidding me...
And seriously, tell that to those that don't have money, it is not how much money you have... they both correlate, i.e. how you spend and how much you have to spend... good players go where they are paid... the team that has more money can get MORE quality players.. really, are you just this bent on arguing?
And your right, you can't compare the two...
superpunk;1586324 said:You asked what we had that all those teams didn't. I gave an answer. Your response has nothing to do with that, or whether or not there are a plethora of idiots out there ready to do the job that Bill Parcells did.
If you can't follow your own shallow, poorly thought-out argument, how can you expect anyone else to?
Dave_in-NC;1586326 said:Do we know if Jones learned any thing yet? He hired Phillips who is suggested to be a push over. (we don't know if that's the case yet) I mean I just read where Wade cut Thorn. Who ever that was. He has said he wants to get more involved again. That will be ok if in fact he has learned.
If he hasn't, people have the right to be fearful. The "good things" have huge gaps between them.
I'll just take the wait and see approach.......again.
You are really clueless.blindzebra;1586333 said:Laughable, but typical from the man-boob sniffing crowd.
Facts are facts, and must be avoided, and more importantly belittled at all costs.
Which was wrong, and just a plain stupid attempt - even for you. Because, we have had a winning team in 3 out of the past 4 years, going to the playoffs twice and sending 7 players to the pro-bowl. Heck, even the 34-32 record we have over that span is something those teams I brought up don't have. They don't even have a winning record in that span.blindzebra;1585824 said:And what do we have that the teams you brought up don't?
blindzebra;1586334 said:Push over like when he lost his job in Buffalo because he refused to throw his assistant under the bus? That kind of boot-licking lackey for the ownership?
blindzebra;1586334 said:Push over like when he lost his job in Buffalo because he refused to throw his assistant under the bus? That kind of boot-licking lackey for the ownership?
jackrussell;1586329 said:You're the one that said "there was NO free agency back then." Was it an error, a lie, or you just don't know what you're talking about?
jackrussell;1586327 said:I'll tell you the relevence when you answer the question. Again, simple as can be....does today's salary cap situation effect how many of your own players you can sign and for how much?
Does it? Don't be scared now.
You claim 10-20 people could have been found to do the job Parcells did. However, you ignored teams like Arizona, Cleveland and Oakland who have sucked for quite some time now - despite having cap space and high draft picks. Apparently you know something they don't about hiring for NFL head coaching gigs.
I'm trying to find a point in the "We've got Jerry Jones" line of thinking, but I simply can't. Jerry on his own, with his puppet regimes was probably one of the worst "football owners" in the NFL from 1997-2001. The only possible advantage he might have on guys like Davis and the Bidwell's and the Browns and Lions is his business sense.khiladi;1586484 said:Maybe it's because Dallas has Jerry Jones... You do realize that the ownership of two of the 3 teams, and I'm not familiar with Cleveland, suck major-ly... maybe the fault is NOT the coaching, but the sucky owners...
look at the facilities in Arizona...