Giving up on Romo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure you are! Until the next Romo hate thread. Stay cool...

My view Is not a romo hate thread..I wanted romo while most where thinking it was someone else.....romo was the man than..he still is...but him and ghis team are trying to show you they are not making the playoffs....unless the division sucks...oh wait...even when the division sucked and a horrible team clawed its way from death....we still lost it all....

Romo has his good and hus badm...if u haven't figured it out.....we cant help you. ...his time is up
 
My view Is not a romo hate thread..I wanted romo while most where thinking it was someone else.....romo was the man than..he still is...but him and ghis team are trying to show you they are not making the playoffs....unless the division sucks...oh wait...even when the division sucked and a horrible team clawed its way from death....we still lost it all....

Romo has his good and hus badm...if u haven't figured it out.....we cant help you. ...his time is up

Your posts are to hard to read, dude. Try a spell check app. Yeah, you don't hate Romo, and if you think I believe that you are wrong.
 
They did their job

How did they "do their job" exactly? They gave up 48 points. Here's a logic question for you: we scored roughly 2x the average amount teams generally score in a game, and we gave up roughly 2x the average amount teams generally give up in a game, so which one of the O or D should get credit for "doing their job"? If the D was even average that game they would have allowed only 21-24 points and the interception would hardly have mattered because we would have won by a huge margin because Romo did an exceptional job of creating points - more than twice the average team produces in a game. A D doing an average job allows 21-24 points a game which means our D did an exceptional job of allowing points - more than twice the average team produces in a game - by the other team, so again how did the D do their job exactly? How exactly is Romo responsible for the D allowing that many points? As far as I know he only plays O.
 
have you only been a fan for a year? if so, thats okay, if not, ummm, i dont know, the record MAYBE.

been watching the cowboys since 1966 and the general consences is JJones very much wants to win. Is he a good GM well no. He does want to win.
 
been watching the cowboys since 1966 and the general consences is JJones very much wants to win. Is he a good GM well no. He does want to win.

He also is not a good owner if he refuses to fire the GM that cannot manage ts franchise any better than it is being managed.
 
Smh....my god people. ..im a troll for saying romo threw an interception. ...I got news for you..romo lovers....myself. .while most people thought drew henson wss going to be the qb of the cowboys...mi got news for you...romo throw untimely ints....oh noes...anyone who spouts thruth is a troll...lol..u guys are funny

you give yourself too much credit but most of us do. The truth you speak of is "your truth"and that does not make you a troll.The name calling on this site is too much,
 
He also is not a good owner if he refuses to fire the GM that cannot manage ts franchise any better than it is being managed.

The question was JJones doesn't care about winning. In response to your reply,few can abdicate their power.
 
The question was JJones doesn't care about winning. In response to your reply,few can abdicate their power.

3 seasons at 8-8...wont fire himself from gm....keeps a coach who keeps proving he is learning on the job...so hes cool..u have bad contracts. ..aging players....and lack of contributions from a few fas.....care to debate any of that.......

Some of us call it evidence
 
3 seasons at 8-8...wont fire himself from gm....keeps a coach who keeps proving he is learning on the job...so hes cool..u have bad contracts. ..aging players....and lack of contributions from a few fas.....care to debate any of that.......

Some of us call it evidence

I'm not disagreeing with jones history as you layed it out.I said Jones is driven to win.I think the logicaal response is what can Jones do to win understanding Jones will not abdicate his throne.Debating his failures isn't enlightening and declaring he is a bad GM is redundant.Give me new material.
 
been watching the cowboys since 1966 and the general consences is JJones very much wants to win. Is he a good GM well no. He does want to win.

I don't think he wants to win because if he did, he would do anything in his power to make that happen. He wants to win it his way but that's not the same thing.
 
How did they "do their job" exactly? They gave up 48 points. Here's a logic question for you: we scored roughly 2x the average amount teams generally score in a game, and we gave up roughly 2x the average amount teams generally give up in a game, so which one of the O or D should get credit for "doing their job"? If the D was even average that game they would have allowed only 21-24 points and the interception would hardly have mattered because we would have won by a huge margin because Romo did an exceptional job of creating points - more than twice the average team produces in a game. A D doing an average job allows 21-24 points a game which means our D did an exceptional job of allowing points - more than twice the average team produces in a game - by the other team, so again how did the D do their job exactly? How exactly is Romo responsible for the D allowing that many points? As far as I know he only plays O.
For more context, the Broncos offense averaged 37.9 ppg. Their defense gave up an average of 24.9 ppg. The score of 51-48 means our offense did 33.2 points better than our defense. Yikes.
 
Well, I'm not ready to get rid of Romo quite yet, but I can't say I'm feeling confident about the upcoming season. If we end up out of the playoffs again, I just don't see how you can't start looking for the future QB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,188
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top