QuincyCarterEra
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,332
- Reaction score
- 10,737
Loool, what’s 100% increase of 2?
C’mon.
Don’t run.
A 100% increase of 2 is 4. 100% of 2 is still 2 lolololololololololololoo
No need to run, which I would advise you to do.
Loool, what’s 100% increase of 2?
C’mon.
Don’t run.
There's no way in hell he's an engineer. I'm sorry that's just a flat out lie.
A 100% increase of 2 is 4. 100% of 2 is still 2 lolololololololololololoo
A 100% increase of 2 is 4. 100% of 2 is still 2 lolololololololololololoo
No need to run, which I would advise you to do.



270 yards rushing against us got him to the Superbowl as well. I have repeated this over and over again. But, emphasis this point, because Dak having Zeke, is what constantly is used to discredit him. Yet, when it comes to QBs that fans favor, they either ignore the Running game contributing to team''s playoff run, in order to give credit to the QB that they like. Or they just use the solid running game and strong supporting cast, if favor of the QB that they support.
"He's a elite QB, he just needs a solid running game to reach his full potential or he couldn't accomplish certain goals, because he didn't have a solid running game/supporting cast. But, I still believe he can be elite and great with a better team."
And if some support QBs like Goff, then they will use a solid running game to enhance the debate in favor of Goff or they still give Goff most of the credit for making it to the Superbowl, despite a huge rushing game being more of a reason why the Rams beat us.
Yet, with Dak it's. "He's not a great QB and will never be a great QB, because he has to have Zeke playing well to win/be productive."
Let's night, Gurley was limited and Belechick wouldn't allow the Rams running game to take off and that put most of the pressure on Dak and the Rams had one of the poorest offensive performances of the Superbowl. That happens with Dak and people are saying how Dak can't win without Zeke.
,,,er,,,and it didn't behoove the RAMS offensive endeavors as, "the dark lord of evil geniuses" defensive & offensive units ,wouldn't square up to the LOS till the final 15 seconds b-4 zebra awarded Delay of game yellow ribbons flew(I read that on this Forum, post game) ,till their monitoring of the signaling helmet sideline to huddle transmissions were of mandatory 'kill' requirements,,,apparently, there is a multi laned & high banked ,,,learning curve should the fine art of " black bagging" yer' sap headed opposition, in the razor edged Sharpness of that genuinely next generation of ingenuity of Sly Shrewdness employed,,,


I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. You probably missed it (and I hope you did) but we had a five or six page thread of him claiming that Cal Poly is an A List school like UCLA.
100% of the posters that think Cal Poly is really smart is...... 1. Himself.
Loooool.
Exactly brainiac.
The percentage increase from 37 to 74 is 100%
So how is 55 “150% more” than 37????



150 percent of 37 is 55.5

Yeah other than that they're exactly the same.
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt. You probably missed it (and I hope you did) but we had a five or six page thread of him claiming that Cal Poly is an A List school like UCLA.
Was that the thread you claimed you attended Caltech and was a recipient of a Silver Star?
Feel free to posts links. You can't because those are flat out lies.
However, I can post the link to you claiming I'm not a Veteran until I said I was in Desert Storm and Bosnia. Then you lied and claimed you never did.
You’re lying out your face and you’ve got the nerve to get arse hurt.
Average GPA requirement and SAT score for Cal Poly:
3.95 and 1293
Acceptance rate: 34.6%
Average for UCLA: 4.36 and 1365
Acceptance rate: 18%
Yeah other than that they're exactly the same.
How’s that GED working out for ya?
“The Cowboy have almost 150% more Rushing TDs from 2016 to 2018:
Cowboys 55
Eagles 37“
My hands are sore from troll-slapping but my azz is just fine.
You're thinking that you're getting taught lessons from a guy who didn't finish high school?
That'd be a bad look for the prostegious Cal Poly lmao

