baltcowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,036
- Reaction score
- 17,746
Guyton and the 3rd. I actually think the Cowboys thought Barton would fall to them but Tampa surprised them.
I favor the trade only because I’m not a scout and the value chart favors the picks we received.Is Tyler Guyton and a 3rd this year better than Graham Barton and a 7th next year?
Which would you have done?
100% true. Nothing is guaranteed and anything can happen. I hope he goes out and kills it from day 1.There is no way we will ever know until they lace up the cleats and play.
Exactly, I think the correct decision was made. Guyton and an early 3rd round pick is a very helpful pick.We need more players in a bad way. I'll take an extra 3rd with the chance the can contribute right away.
Yes - it’s better. Makes the Steele extension look ****** stupid.Is Tyler Guyton and a 3rd this year better than Graham Barton and a 7th next year?
Which would you have done?
Where does this "best center in the draft" and "plug and Play" come from with Barton?Barton would have been my pick, I think the C position is very undervalued in todays game.
I'm OK with Guyton, hes a solid end of the 1st talent, but I think Barton is a legitimate top 20 talent who is a plug and play starter that fell in our lap
What floor were You on?The 3rd rd pick is the only reason I didn't jump out my window last night. If they took guyton over barton at 24 I woulda went crazy
I think you have to wait and see who they draft with that 3rd round pick first.
Then you compare Guyton PLUS that player against drafting Barton.
My only concern when the Cowboys trade back to gain more picks is they have a history of viewing those new picks as "free option" picks, meaning they can take chances on asterisk players
Let’s see what they do with pick before saying it is good or bad!Is Tyler Guyton and a 3rd this year better than Graham Barton and a 7th next year?
Which would you have done?
OT is a premium position!I voted Barton. IMO, C is an undervalued position
How?Makes the Steele extension look ****** stupid.
They have an LT with starting experience. His name is Tyler Smith.Guyton and a 3 are good value, but Dallas needs 2 starting Olineman before this year. Barton is a better asset in that regard.
However, if they pick up an iOL today and then sign a LT with starting experience in June/July in case Guyton isn’t NFL ready week 1, then my opinion would flip.
Don't agree. Per his NFL draft profile, he has the measurables you want - size, strength, foot movement, etc. He does have some technique issues but what no. 29 pick doesn't? Even Tyron Smith didn't make the Pro Bowl until his 3rd year.Love the trade back but Guyton is closer to bust than all pro.
If Smith moves over to LT, what does Guyton play?They have an LT with starting experience. His name is Tyler Smith.
No question: Barton. You can keep the 7th next year also.Is Tyler Guyton and a 3rd this year better than Graham Barton and a 7th next year?
Which would you have done?
The only way Smith moves to LT is if Guyton isn't ready to handle it. If he's not ready to handle it, then he plays swing tackle. Bass would be the starting LG and Smith would be the starting LT. The other option would be Richards at LT and keeping Smith at LG. But there are options if Guyton isn't ready to go.If Smith moves over to LT, what does Guyton play?
The technique issues he has arent compareable to other picks. He is very raw and seems to be a mental midget. He is more of a project. You dont draft such players with your first rounder .especially if you are in need of so many players.Don't agree. Per his NFL draft profile, he has the measurables you want - size, strength, foot movement, etc. He does have some technique issues but what no. 29 pick doesn't? Even Tyron Smith didn't make the Pro Bowl until his 3rd year.
I'd put him more likely to be All Pro....