goshan;1136144 said:
Hostile
Here is why people have a hard time believing you...QC fan or not.
Nobody, besides Hostile on The Zone has ever reported this so called 'fact'.
How is it Hostile is so much in the know?
I am sorry but I don't have that much faith in you. The events that I witnessed in terms of the way he was cut and the things I have read do not point toward your 'fact' being accurate.
You can present it as fact if you want but I don't buy it.
You're correct, I didn't report it in March when I was told. Why not? Holy cow what would the reaction have been? I'd have been denegrating a deity. It's 2 years later and look how you're reacting to this.
I shared the information when I got it with another poster. As I said, it's his call if he wants to verify that or not. There were 2 QBs talked about to bring in and be the guy, the other signed with another team. They then waited for Vinny. I've shared this same info several times since then. This thread isn't the first time.
I asked you to simply put 2 and 2 together and I presented to you plenty of circumstantial evidence to back it up. For example...
Bill's 3 year rule.
Henson being Jerry's guy.
Vinny being Bill's guy.
Them not wanting to get rid of Romo.
The restrictions of the CBA precluding Jerry from notifying Bill of a failed drug test.
Bill & Jerry both maintaining it had nothing to do with that positive test.
You don't need to believe me. Does it pass the smell test? That's all I ask you to consider. Forget my "source" for a minute and look at those factors alone.
You're trying to tell me there was a conspiracy to eliminate him based on a failed marijuana test. How on earth can you buy that? That doesn't pass the smell test. In every other case of a drug suspension on this team the player has come back to contribute. Why not this one guy, the starting QB for crying out loud? Why is he different? Over weed? The starting QB. The most important position on the field. He was good enough, but the weed did him in?
Come on man, how naive are you? Irvin came back from a suspension for coke, but this guy gets waived for weed?
Yeah, it has nothing whatsoever to do with his talent level, or his grasp of the game, or Bill's 3 year rule. Bill loved the guy, but he couldn't have weed on his team.
Lawrence Taylor, Lawrence Taylor, Lawrence Taylor...
But his waiver isn't about his talent level?
You do realize that it was either him or Romo that would have been released in 2004 right? From where I sit they made the right choice.
Like I said before, believe whatever you want, but sell it to someone who the synapses don't fire for. The team did in fact report that he was being waived because of his "performance." So don't tell me that "fact" was never reported on this forum or anywhere else. I guess you didn't witness that or you think the management of your team are a bunch of liars.
How convenient, and how incredibly sad.
