cowboyeric8;3832262 said:
Wow, that was unbelievable. The kid had clearly given up.
This reminds me of the video of the Dallas police officer who wouldn't let the Houston Texans running back Ryan Moats go visit his dying mother-in-law after he ran a stop light.
Reminds me more of this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9llvTQn8v-c (gave up a couple seconds before being slammed) or more like this for the group beating with vehicle catalyst:
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/05/birmingham_police_beating_vide_1.html
In that case, the cops could have been beating a guy who had already died. Now that would have been embarrassing.
Info:
The cops aren't going to spend much time in jail if convicted and won't be felons.
Felony charges were sought, but the grand jury only returned the lesser charges (official oppression, class A misdemeanor: up to $4k fine, 1 year jail).
The four awaiting trial have pled not guilty and have been fired. Three others not charged have also been fired. There were 12 involved total that received disciplinary action of some sort.
Opinion:
The people of Houston better get prepared to open their wallets to that kid for their poor cops' behavior. Anyone on the forum should be sure to set aside ~$0.01-$1.00 in their budgets for him. A pic of that kid's money would be lolworthy and help alleviate my boredom for a couple seconds as well.
Also, what those cops did was felonious.
If I:
Repeatedly kicked the head of a teenager, prone, not protecting himself: Attempted murder or aggravated assault.
Repeatedly kicked a teenager's testicles, prone, not able to protect himself: aggravated assault, maybe even sexual assault (spread his legs to gain access).
Get four others to help me out: Aggravated assault for all of us.
Relevant statute that defines when the kid and any bystanders could have resisted his arrest legally with force (they should expect to be illegally killed in response, though, so it's not advised, just legal):
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm section 9.31 said:
(b) The use of force against another is not justified:
(2) to resist an arrest or search that the actor knows is being made by a peace officer, or by a person acting in a peace officer's presence and at his direction, even though the arrest or search is unlawful, unless the resistance is justified under Subsection (c);
(c) The use of force to resist an arrest or search is justified:
(1) if, before the actor offers any resistance, the peace officer (or person acting at his direction) uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary to make the arrest or search; and
(2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the peace officer's (or other person's) use or attempted use of greater force than necessary.
Sec. 9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON.
(a) A person is justified in using deadly force against another:
(1) if the actor would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.31;
Sarcasm:
The kid on the ground needs to be charged with felony assault of an officer. Did you see him repeatedly attacking those officer's boots and hands with his face, calves, back, and testicles? Can't get away with that when it's on video, kid.