Here's what I love about Romo.
A (estimating) 10 for 14, 1 INT performance through three quarters is now considered "pretty bad." There have been times the last few years where that might be considered ok.
Some of Romo's doubters wanted to see how he'd respond to adversity. I think Mickey even penned a column asking as much. I believe Romo's performance against Indianapolis lends a little insight to that. He and the rest of the offense had no rhythm. But you wouldn't have guess that based on how he performed in the 4th.
That's pretty telling.