I understand that, but I want to know if your understand that we don't have anyone opposite Ware suited to play SOLB. At 260 ware is the best fit to do it. We already have a need at SOLB (without any idea if we will be able to draft a true SOLB). My point is this, at this day and time we are hands down in the same prediciment at SOLB as last year. The guy that we traded for to play opposite Ware is gone. The other 2 are coming off injury. Its easier to have Ware play SOLB with Thornton as the WOLB and cover our shortcomings than to have Ware at WOLB and teams abuse us to the SOLB.
Realize, I am basing this on the assumption that the SOLB is SUPPOSED to have a greater run stopping ability which niether Thornton, Boiman, Shanle, Burnett , or Singleton have over Ware as of right now. I am also basing this on the fact that teams could draft Carpenter and Wimberly (guy more suited for SOLB) ahead of us. Forcing us to draft Lawson (who will weigh 240, 20LBs less than Ware if he gets to 260). In this scenario, which guy is better suited to play SOLB? Ware!!! Now if we are fortunate to grab a Wimberly or Carpenter, then this whole debate is useless, but as I've stated before, that not our right of passage. Lastly, for someone just to boldly say it ain't happening, because I say it ain't, is a hell of an debate.