I never understood why people kept blaming the OC for the unimaginative play calling. I mean one OC being unimaginative I can believe. But he's on what OC #4? Every year it's the same issue and the only constant in all of them is the QB.
It's a very strange thing to brag about isn't it? Between that and that whole fake "leadership" badge.
Not sure I know what this "argument" is about...but I had to give you a like and kudos. Not very often I have to search phrases....but that's a good one!
Given how often GM's are fired and how often the screw up the selection of a QB, I'd say I'm just as qualified.
Sometimes you have to take a step backwards to move forward… I would rather do that than keep banging my head against the concrete wall.Getting rid of a 2nd Team All-Pro QB without a good replacement available = the key to winning a SB?
Anti-Dak Cult logic. You people know NOTHING about football.
You can't even think about getting rid of Dak unless you have someone in the building who you think can be the franchise QB after Dak. Wake up.
If Trey Lance had panned out, you'd maybe get your wish.
Why would getting rid of Dak make them better??? Dak was hurt for most of this season..... will that make the team go "forward" now???
Nobody is bragging. Stating facts. Dak was runner up in the MVP voting last year. Did he suck this year? Absolutely. Is cooper rush equal or or better than Dak. Not even close.
Rush is effective provided the offensive line is effective, the same holds true for Dak. The main difference is the speed in going through progressions, Rush is faster (no pun intended).
Easy, he plays for the Dallas Cowboys. A franchise owned and managed by a man who is hell bent on proving to the world that he is a football guy. It's that hubris that has made him keep Garrett around for a decade and it's the same hubris that is going to keep Prescott around until he retires. This team has no ability to evaluate talent adequately.
Jimmy Garapollo. It happens, franchises overestimate what they have as a franchise QB, either that or they grade on a curve thinking that he might just overcome it. Problem is that when you are nearing a decade and he still hasn't overcome it and you decided to extend the dude.
I would argue that Rush is better than Dak with a poor offensive line. With a great offensive line Dak should be better.
No, but Garoppolo never had the luxury of playing the Giants twice a year. He was paid and viewed as a franchise QB for a bit in San Fran who traded for him.
I don't. You keep claiming he is a top 10 QB but that ranking is based on what? Your opinion? My opinion is that his body of work is largely based on stats wracked up against bad to below average teams. Put him up against a decent defense and the dude doesn't just struggle he absolutely folds. Now we can blame the team around him etc. But it doesn't change the fact that his play goes to absolute hell when playing decent defenses. I'm sure you will claim all QB's have this - sure, but do those other QB's absolutely fall apart? A perfect example is that first half against GB - defense is getting shredded and the offense is out there sleep walking. Mr. Leader there can't even bother to rally the troops? Where is this mythical leadership we keep hearing about? Sorry but what you have here is fools gold.
Part of the deal is Dak has to play against teams not named the Eagles. Maybe for $65 million per season he can bother to beat other teams, too. The Cowboys are more likely to come in 4th next season than 2nd. That is Cowboys’ fans reality.Why would getting rid of Dak make them better??? Dak was hurt for most of this season..... will that make the team go "forward" now???
"DURRRR JUST TANK AND DRAFT DA NEXT MAHOMES!!"
Psst, Dak is 9-4 vs the Eagles and dismantled them the last time he played them. Dallas won the division the last time Dak was healthy all year.
"DURRRR EAGLES FANZ LOVE LOSING TO DAK, OF COURSE DEY WANT HIM BACK!!!"
Are you done humiliating yourself yet?
