MarcusRock
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,450
- Reaction score
- 18,120
It never ceases to amaze me how much people overrate the emotional part of the game.
This thread proves you can never overrate the emotions of fans.
It never ceases to amaze me how much people overrate the emotional part of the game.
I would like for us to beat both the Rams and the Eagles.
I would like us to beat the rams and the eagles to lose to the cardials by 30. Why - because i hate the eagles and love the cowboys, that is all
I'm skeptical but I'd be interested in seeing evidence either way. Do teams perform better (perhaps going by point-spread) after a loss than after a win? Beats me. My assumption is "no," but I don't have any particular knowledge one way or the other.True, I do think coming off a loss a team tends to focus in more through out the week because they have a sense of backs up against the wall. But sure games are won and loss by preparation and execution
Who said we could only get a win over one of the teams? Sure, if you place that constraint, obviously beating the Eagles is better. But I don't accept your premise that we can only win one (or that losing the first one makes us more likely to win the second one).If u could only get a W over one of the two teams, wouldnt it be better to beat a division rival on national TV?
You know why? Because I rather us go into the Linc on a nationally televised game to play a undefeated Eagles team who everyone would be picking to win. That would motivate the hell out of our defense after hearing all week about how great Jalen Hurts is and how they are hard to beat. So you combine that with coming off a loss to the Rams and being underdogs against a division rival, there is no way in hell they lose that game. Of course I would love for us to beat the Rams but if they lose and the eagles are still undefeated, I believe it sets up everything for the following week. I would prefer a win over a overhyped division rival instead of a NFC team out of the division to calm the eagles hype down,
No you must pick or dieCan we not root for the team to win both games?
Can we not root for the team to win both games?
Ok maybe not die. But you have to pickNo you must pick or die
I'm skeptical but I'd be interested in seeing evidence either way. Do teams perform better (perhaps going by point-spread) after a loss than after a win? Beats me. My assumption is "no," but I don't have any particular knowledge one way or the other.
You want to lose?
You're overthinking this one, sir.
I'm skeptical but I'd be interested in seeing evidence either way. Do teams perform better (perhaps going by point-spread) after a loss than after a win? Beats me. My assumption is "no," but I don't have any particular knowledge one way or the other.
Of course I'd rather beat the Eagles, but for no other reason than it's a divisional game and that is very important in regards to tiebreakers at the end of the season.Of course we want to win every week, but it wouldnt feel better to beat the eagles in their house? Yes 5-1 would be great but if we had to be 4-2 wouldnt you want that win over the eagles instead of the Rams?
^ ThisCan we not root for the team to win both games?
You know why? Because I rather us go into the Linc on a nationally televised game to play a undefeated Eagles team who everyone would be picking to win. That would motivate the hell out of our defense after hearing all week about how great Jalen Hurts is and how they are hard to beat. So you combine that with coming off a loss to the Rams and being underdogs against a division rival, there is no way in hell they lose that game. Of course I would love for us to beat the Rams but if they lose and the eagles are still undefeated, I believe it sets up everything for the following week. I would prefer a win over a overhyped division rival instead of a NFC team out of the division to calm the eagles hype down,