:laugh2:jimmy40;3729171 said:Well, since it seems Newton can only be compared to other African American black QBs I'd say he looks better than Josh Freeman.
I would, too.realtick;3733065 said:I tell you what, as a pure QB prospect on the field, I'd take Newton over Tebow...
burmafrd;3729650 said:oh come on. That is such a ridiculous statement.
Newton has had only one system, right? So claiming he could play in any system is really funny.
burmafrd;3732218 said:just like every other big physical prospect, you numbies ignore the mental aspect. In that area he is suspect. Not bad as Jumungous and others, but suspect.
Double Trouble;3733104 said:I would, too.
But the off the field stuff, I can't get past, especially when we're talking about a 1st rounder, and even moreso when it's a QB.
Where is the stolen laptop in Romo's past? The money scandal? No way I'm taking a QB in the first round with those questions dogging him. A really good team in the mid or late 1st might take that gamble, but the Cowboys can't afford to.
realtick;3734036 said:Not that he's stupid or dumb, but rather very immature. I have a hard time picturing him taking the time to breakdown film and opponents when nobody is looking.
JMO
I'm not so sure Cam is going to be a great pro. I haven't studied him that closely yet, but from the 4-5 games I've seen, he seems like a great college player who may possibly have decent pro potential.Texas_Pete;3729017 said:Would you be on board with the Cowboys taking him? No diss to Romo, but I could imagine having Cam Newton throwing to Dez for a decade or so...
Thoughts?
DFWJC;3734592 said:I'm not so sure Cam is going to be a great pro. I haven't studied him that closely yet, but from the 4-5 games I've seen, he seems like a great college player who may possibly have decent pro potential.
I'm not even sure he is as good as the last decent Auburn QB to come out. Jason Campbell just didn't need to throw it alot because he had Cad Williams, Ronnie Brown and Brandon Jacobs. Boy, that 13-0 team should have least had a chance to play for a title. Waht a crime.
:laugh2: Tell me about it. I shouldn't laugh but their fan base would be suicidal. They have had some tough luck over the years. That 10-1 (I think Bo Jackson et al) team that didn't win the title because BYU beat a 6-5 Michigan team was really sad too.Muhast;3734608 said:I think they would have beaten USC and Oklahoma who both played in the Nat. Championship game (that ended up being forfeited b/c of Bush)
They got the short end of the stick. How ironic will it be if they win this year only to have it taken away b/c THEY have a player who gets in trouble.
I hope it doesnt, but it will be very ironic.
Agree with the one year wonder issues.Muhast;3734551 said:I worry about the fact that he has only attempted more then 25 passes ONCE in his NCAA career. That was against S.Carolina last weekend.
There isn't a ton of video on him as a passing threat. I think he is a great college player, fun to watch but at this point I'd def. take Tebow over him (and I don't even like Tim Tebow)
I am really against taking one year wonders. I like drafting guys that played 2-3 years of high level football and have endless amounts of gametape on.
I would be very worried that he'd sign a big deal, play well for a year and then get lazy.
I don't get the Russell comparison at all. Freeman or Tebow I could understand.
DFWJC;3734640 said::laugh2: Tell me about it. I shouldn't laugh but their fan base would be suicidal. They have had some tough luck over the years. That 10-1 (I think Bo Jackson et al) team that didn't win the title because BYU beat a 6-5 Michigan team was really sad too.
Here are some of the players on the 2004 undeafeated SEC champ team that got left out:
Ronnie Brown--RB
Jason Campbell--QB
Cadillac Williams--RB
Marcus McNeil--OT
Jay Ratliff--DT
Tim Duckworth--OG
Will Herring--FS
David Aromashadu--WR
Ben Obomanu--WR
Carlos Rodgers--CB
Quentin Groves--DE
Patrick Lee-CB
Marquin QWinn--DE
Kody Bliss--P
Travis Williams--LB
Stan McGlover
that's just a few of the NFL players...but there were more...and a bunch of good college-only players too.
Would have been fun to see.
I will say, that USC team was was very good. It's OU that took Auburn's spot, imo.
True...they held that game nearly two full seasons earlier (and with a different cast of players and maturity and chemistry) against them. But that's how college foootball works...half of it is perception sadly. That USC was great though. It was OU that I had a problem with.joseephuss;3735554 said:Everyone still remembered USC stomping Auburn to open the 2003 season at Auburn and the Tigers finishing the year 8-5. They were expected to do better than that in 2003. I think that played a part in them not being highly regarded through much of the 2004 season and therefore finishing 3rd in the final regular season rankings.