Since he spoke of 'historic significance' it may well be appropriate to go back to leather heads.
You use strident language and aggressive tones in an effort to bully others into submission. But anyone following along can see that you're shifting the terms under discussion, from 'historic significance' to 'recognition' or 'being iconic'. He's right to resist you by pointing out it's not about popularity or recent success. He was taking about historic significance. Why did you take him on if you were interested in having a different discussion?
His constantly aggressive tone is laughable. It's an internet forum, buddy. Stop acting like you want to fight someone.
And what it boils down to, is Matt really doesn't have that many cards to play. You read any post or thread by him, and it always comes down to the same points over and over.
-Dak sux (I'm sorry that he beat you up and took your lunch money when you were a kid).
-Zeke doesn't break long runs (he breaks 15+ yarders at the second-highest rate in football).
-Zeke doesn't score TDs (he scored 25 TDs in his first 25 games, the law of small numbers ensures he was going to have a down season some time but scoring/short yardage is absolutely not an issue).
-Cooper only had two big games (did you not see the dude separating at will? did you not see his playoff games? Coop's the real deal).
His shtick gets old very fast.