McCordsville Cowboy
Pro-Quinn
- Messages
- 4,316
- Reaction score
- 1
theogt;1617937 said:Where the hell did that come from?
Just trying to break up the heated tension in this thread
theogt;1617937 said:Where the hell did that come from?
iceberg;1617916 said:if it is it's purely unintentional - i have sigs turned off cause some of 'em get pretty crazy big and make the scrolling take just that much longer. : )
jackrussell;1617970 said:If you turned it on...you'd see this...
Teddy Robb in 2011
iceberg;1617926 said:i get why you started it and i appreciate your reply. probably nicer than my initial reply to the whole topic. like i said, i'm sure i came across harsh but it's just a pet peeve of mine i may need to just keep in check more.
I agree, the real question should be Mcfadden or Slaton. Slaton looks like a friggin video game sometimes. The thought of either of these guys in our backfield is exciting.Q_the_man;1617973 said:Slaton looked real good yesterday
smarta5150;1617386 said:Jackson is a GREAT Punt Returner and thats about it.
Why are people all over this kid as a WR?
Cal has about 2-3 other players who will be better NFL prospects.
iceberg;1617920 said:just because someone i rarely agree with i now happen to agree with - that doesn't make either of us right or wrong.
it's just gonna get so old hearing CLEVELAND LOST! here's come the #1 pick and mcfadden!!!" when you have NO CLUE as to if the rest of the season will play out that way, our needs won't change, and mcfadden will still be a top choice.
so much can change in a year it's all pointless to me. when people do it, i'll whine. i never said *i'd* ignore it. i said if my whining bugs you, feel free to ignore *me*.
get it right.
Deep_Freeze;1618283 said:Thread police!!
Better ask iceberg for permission before posting your next thread about the future, lol.
iceberg;1618287 said:ooo - the police of the thread police! better ask you if i can counter a thread before i do!!!
that can go on forever.
Deep_Freeze;1618291 said:That circle gets me dizzy thinking about it, lol.
iceberg;1618296 said:<falls to ground face first>
ouch.
5Stars;1618301 said:Man, Iceberg...those shrooms must have been some bad stuff last night! Better check that blood pressure...
Tristan;1618157 said:I agree, the real question should be Mcfadden or Slaton. Slaton looks like a friggin video game sometimes. The thought of either of these guys in our backfield is exciting.
I can't believe I had to read through five pages of whining by somebody who has the audacitiy to come in this thread and bictch about it's subject matter.
I'll tell you what is going to get old, jerks coming around all season telling us how stupid we are for discussing future drafts, draft scenarios etc.
It is obviously very enjoyable for some of us to speculate, guess, obsess, debate and share opinions about future drafts and all it's possibilities, for some of us it is never to early, and never enough.
If you don't get it, then beat it!
America's Team;1618169 said:I say we wait 2 years and grab Mike Ford out of USF, hes averaging 14 yards a carry and has 3 TDs this last game, and he went to my high school.
iceberg;1618378 said:no shrooms dude. it was a cross between rumpleminsk and tokillya.
Q_the_man;1617973 said:Slaton looked real good yesterday