jgboys1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,590
- Reaction score
- 3,559
ScipioCowboy;4380315 said:Giants beat Packers by 17.
Giants beat Cowboys by 17.
Ergo, Cowboys = Packers.
Ahh. We are not bad as I thought.
ScipioCowboy;4380315 said:Giants beat Packers by 17.
Giants beat Cowboys by 17.
Ergo, Cowboys = Packers.
SWG9;4380322 said:Look, I'm a big Tony Romo fan, but there's no two ways about it:
Eli Manning's actual accomplishments are more valuable than Tony Romo's hypothetical accomplishments.
We can sit here and talk about would have could have should have all day, the simple fact of the matter is that Eli is playing in another conference championship game while we're stuck trying to convince ourselves that Carl Nicks is the magical saviour for this team.
I like Romo, but you can't argue against facts with theories in the NFL.
Doomsday101;4380323 said:Why not it is the truth. Aikman was great guess what he had a line that would allow him time to sit in the pocket and a defense that did not let the other team back in the game.
Joe Realist;4380347 said:Some players have it, some don't. Romo had a great line in 2007, a great defense in 2009..nothing. This sounds like more excuses,,if Romo hasd this or that.. He will be gone from the Cowboys and people will still be saying it. I like Romo, time is running out.
Just last year people were saying Romo was better than Rodgers and I stated, wait until the playoffs are over and there won't even be a debate.
Bigdog;4380366 said:They will be the first 9-7 team to win it and some of us here would have to eat crow as I remember a thread saying that no 9-7 team has ever won a Super Bowl. I hope they don't win but I really don't know who I want out of the NFC. I can't stand the Giants but am surrounded by 49ers fan who think their team can do not wrong.
Suave;4380343 said:I certainly agree with this. At some point, people should realize that Eli is a legitimate QB. I know it pains many of us Cowboys fans to say it, but the man has come up big. Yes, he has good elements surrounding him to support him, but give credit to the Giants' front office. Perhaps, if the Cowboys had a front office that makes sound personnel decisions to provide this team with enough impact players (and quality depth), then the Cowboys would be playing in the playoffs now.
Doomsday101;4380355 said:Yes some players have protection and some don't, it is a team game not a QB game if the SB went to the best QB based on the season Rodgers would be hosting the Saints this weekend. I make no excuse but I dame well know to get the most production out of any QB you must give them protection and we have failed to give that to Romo.
I'm not interested in saying who is better but part of what makes Rodgers great or Brees great or even Eli is the guys around him who give them the protection.
Take away the protection and they will all make mistakes they will have the costly turnovers. This is why defense stresses so much about getting after the QB and putting pressure in his face because if you do that then you will cause any QB to make critical errors. This is why a guy like Warner could look unstoppable with the Rams and even the Cards but looked like crud after that protection went away.
You're not alone.ScipioCowboy;4380380 said:Perhaps I'm alone in this opinion, but I think the Niners have a decided advantage next week.
Joe Realist;4380381 said:I'll just say this - there are discussions of " what if, if we, if only he had this....blah blah " and there are results. Is it all on the QB, no, but when evaluating a QB's career, people know if he won or not. There is no gaurantee that Romo does the thing as Eli with a better line and defense. Hmm, who build that defense and oline anyway? Regardless I hope Romo get's it done..time is running out.
Doomsday101;4380401 said:Yes in the end many people look at the results and make their grand statements. I look at why results happen. It is not hard to see how most of these team in the post season have played in terms of protection of the QB. If you think Romo offensive line stacks up then that clearly is a view most would not agree with you on. If you think this defense is playing to a high stadard who can shut a team down late in game when you grab the lead then again you and only a few handful would agree.
As for Romo yes I think he has top notch talent and to get the most out that talent the Cowboys must do a better job of giving him protection. You can sign the praises of Eli, Rodgers, Brady and Brees all you want but if you can't see how much better they do in protecting their QB then the only blind person here is you
5Stars;4380287 said:If that's the way you think, you need to tell me some more about you?
Like, what are the numbers for the Lottery next year?
![]()
Only losers think like that.
Doomsday101;4380401 said:Yes in the end many people look at the results and make their grand statements. I look at why results happen. It is not hard to see how most of these team in the post season have played in terms of protection of the QB. If you think Romo offensive line stacks up then that clearly is a view most would not agree with you on. If you think this defense is playing to a high stadard who can shut a team down late in game when you grab the lead then again you and only a few handful would agree.
As for Romo yes I think he has top notch talent and to get the most out that talent the Cowboys must do a better job of giving him protection. You can sign the praises of Eli, Rodgers, Brady and Brees all you want but if you can't see how much better they do in protecting their QB then the only blind person here is you
Joe Realist;4380411 said:Not saying he has better or adequate protection. I am saying , every year there seems to be some excuse and it will continue well after he retires unless.....
Doomsday101;4380416 said:Call it an excuse if you like I see it for what it is. I think Romo has the weapons in place I think to be able to utlize those weapons we need to give him protection. I think Tyron Smith was a big step in that direction and my hope is we can continue to move in that direction because if the playoffs show anything it is how important it is to winning. QB may get all the accolades but it is the big guys up front that allow it to happen
ScipioCowboy;4380415 said:Excellent point.
From the game today, most people will remember the performance of the Giants' defensive line and the relentless pressure they applied to Rodgers. And, admittedly, the performance was quite impressive and worthy of recognition.
However, equally impressive was the Giants' offense doing essentially anything it wanted to do. Manning converted third down, including third and long, at a ridiculous pace because his offensive line dominated.
A team can, to a point, manufacture pass rush with blitzing. It's far more difficult to manufacture pass protection.
Joe Realist;4380418 said:I dont disagree about getting a line. Hoepfully it gets better, defense can get fixed and one day Romo can hoist a Lombardi. I'm not holding my breath though
Mr Cowboy;4380425 said:With no pass rush and a crappy secondary, Rodgers would have scored a fifty burger on us today.
The difference in today's Giants and the end of the year Cowboys is their defensive line. They put a ton of pressure on Rodgers this week and Atlanta last week. Everything else feeds of off this.
We can't close out games, and if we were in the playoffs, we wouldn't be able to stop anyone.
I just hope Jerry is not watching and saying, "we are close, we had them by 12 and should of won." "We don't have to make any moves this off season because we almost beat the Giants."
