Nova
Ntegrase96
- Messages
- 10,699
- Reaction score
- 12,658
As long as we have romo we are contenders, period.
Haters aren't Gonna like this
We were contenders last year?
O.K.
As long as we have romo we are contenders, period.
Haters aren't Gonna like this
Depends on how we got to the postseason. By that I mean, if we are more of a balanced team with Murray getting 20+ rush/GM or are we relying on Romos arm again. If we continue feeding the rock to Murray andetring our OLINE impose their will on opponents, then yes we can contend (if healthy)! I'm a firm believer Romo can win a chip but not by averaging 32+ att/GM with the belief he can pass us to a chip.
this is all well and good, how do we sell it to the coaches?
True. Allow me to clarify.We beat Philadelphia at home in 2011 during our 11-5 campaign, winning the division.
True. Allow me to clarify.
The OP questions whether a 2014 regular season campaign ending with a playoff berth could be a sign of Super Bowl contending legitimacy. I disagree. I feel that a strong regular season effort, combined with sound playoff victory, would be a sign of a true contending team. Without question, Dallas' 34-14 victory over Philadelphia was an elusive playoff victory. However, I was inferring more to an elusive statement-like playoff win representative of a strong regular season showing, which carries over into the next round. Even though the team won by 20, it was victory over an Eagles team riding the last legs of Donovan McNabb. And the following week's abysmal performance against Minnesota, where Romo was literally fed to the Vikings defense on a silver platter all game long, was a more accurate reflection of Dallas' ability for winning its wild card game the prior week.
I misused "elusive." Sorry about that.
Gawd you're depressing.
I don't think anybody is really predicting 0-16, but I do read a lot "wait till after the draft".
What rookie or rookies are going to significantly add to the win total in their first season? It usually takes time for rookies to adjust from the college game to the pro game and thinking a rookie or group of rookies are going to add 2 or 3 wins to your season all by themselves is not reasonable in my opinion.
In other words, what ever the talent level of the roster is today (say 7 or 8 wins) is not going to significantly change by adding rookies from the draft. Maybe 1 more game could be expected if the rookies really preform from day 1.
I just don't see the logical connection between "we are an 8 win team today but an 11 win team after the draft".......................that is unrealistic expectations from a rookie draft class.
Anyone who makes it to the Playoffs is a "legitimate Super Bowl contender".
Those who don't, aren't.
No way. The real question should be, when will we even get back to the NFC Championship game, much less win the thing to get to the Super Bowl?
Someone here posted this a while back and I forget who it was, but I saved it:
"Here is a list of teams that have been in the NFC Championship game since the last time we were:
West: San Francisco(4), St.Louis(2), Arizona, Seattle(2)
South: Carolina(3), New Orleans(2), Tampa Bay(2), Atlanta(3)
North: Green Bay(4), Minnesota(3), Chicago(2),
East: New York(3), Philadelphia(5),
Dallas, Detroit, and Washington are the only teams not to appear in the NFC Championship since 1996.
That's 18 years with 36 spots available and we haven't been there ONE TIME...."
No way. The real question should be, when will we even get back to the NFC Championship game, much less win the thing to get to the Super Bowl?
Someone here posted this a while back and I forget who it was, but I saved it:
"Here is a list of teams that have been in the NFC Championship game since the last time we were:
West: San Francisco(4), St.Louis(2), Arizona, Seattle(2)
South: Carolina(3), New Orleans(2), Tampa Bay(2), Atlanta(3)
North: Green Bay(4), Minnesota(3), Chicago(2),
East: New York(3), Philadelphia(5),
Dallas, Detroit, and Washington are the only teams not to appear in the NFC Championship since 1996.
That's 18 years with 36 spots available and we haven't been there ONE TIME...."
What was the last team to just show up in the playoffs all of a sudden one year, after being out of it for five years, and wins the Super Bowl. It seems to me most of the recent champions are regular playoff teams. There's a myth that teams can go from worst to first, or something along those lines. I think Jerry buys that. I don't think the evidence is very good. Seattle, Baltimore, Giants, Packers, Steelers, etc. I mean, the last team to suddenly show up and win the Super Bowl were about a dozen years ago (Rams or Ravens).
You sir, are obviously a hater to bring up these facts
False. Kansas City and the Colts last year were not legitimate contenders. They were going to get smoked in the next round no matter who they played. We were not contenders in 1999 either. Packers last year were not really legitimate contenders, either.
Were their chances less? Sure. They are still contenders regardless, thus nothing "False" about my statement.