theogt;1536060 said:
There really shouldn't be any question at all. We know Parcells' version of the 3-4 doesn't work in the NFL.
I don't agree. I know his defense does work. I know it didn't work as well as we'd all like but it worked here and certainly elsewhere.
This team is in a different universe with Parcells' entire touch on the organization. We'll never know what would have happened had he stayed. Or if Ellis had stayed in the lineup. It's no surprise the defense fell off...or crumpled when we lost the ability to rush the passer well enough. I think Bill could have done better even that said. But he's conservative and overall that served him well.
Without Bill Parcells I'd hate to see what this organization would look like. I'd bet big money it wouldn't be at a point where people around the league were talking SB. Jerry maybe but not the way Dallas is being looked at by the rest of the league and media (yes even ESPN some).
OTOH, I think it was a perfect time for Wade to arrive. I'm not talking out both sides of my mouth either. Bill admits his way runs thin when you aren't winning. Hopefully Wade's way works for awhile and 'hits the spot'. And hopefully a lot of people's optimistic outlooks for this defense, including mine, are truly deserved.
If Wade is immediately successful it will be because he inherited a team ready to take off. And because Wade is probably the best person available to take it to the next step.
I don't think Wade could have taken what was handed to Bill and make it what was handed to him. And I and everyone else will never know if Bill could have taken this team to the next step. Wade doesn't have to do better than Bill would or could or should have done. All he has to do is win.
To answer your question I'd rather have Bill as HC and Wade as DC as long as Wade had been around long enough to gain Bill's trust.