So let's follow this.
First you say it doesn't matter that Iloka played FS in the Bengals Cover 3 because Seattle played Cover 1.
Now all of a sudden after realizing you had no idea what Seattle/Richard primary cover scheme is, you are going to go back and say Iloka can't play it despite the fact we have people from Cincy saying he played it and played it well.
And by almost all accounts, his cut from Cincy caught everyone by surprise because, in fact, he had played just fine for Cincy as a FS. It's not like he sucked last year and they just set him free.
Why is it so hard to just say, "Wow, you are right, I didn't realize the similarities in the two defenses and Iloka actually played a competent FS there......"
I mean one can still say that and think Thomas is a much better option.