Inefficiency of our first down runs and passing game bailing us out on 3rd down

[CowboysFaninHouston]

No doubt. Biggest troll on the forum. Put him on ignore a few years ago when he arrived. I probably have about 10 others like that. Their drivel disappears.

couple of them pretend to know football. a few of them have zero football knowledge or understanding. they are TMZ

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Respectfully, that same person who offered the account bet loss two or three other account bets to me. He's not even supposed to be posting anything right now, but that problem child didn't honor the bet results when he loss.

he has zero integrity. what do you expect?

 

[CowboyRoy]

couple of them pretend to know football. a few of them have zero football knowledge or understanding. they are TMZ

Its hard to imagine anyone being THAT football dumb. But they are all out there. MOST dont understand the game in detail.

 

[America's Cowboy]

he really doesn't understand football at all. watching a video is way over his head. if you notice none of his posts are actually football related. just TMZ. and he is a final stat sheet guy, and he reads something and its negative and he keeps picking at it, because he has nothing else.

he is entertainment. like the village idiot. just throw him a bone now and then and he keeps busy chewing on it for a while

Agreed.

"The Greatest Show on Turf" was the nickname for the St. Louis Rams' record-breaking offense during the 1999, 2000, and 2001 National Football League seasons. The offense was designed by attack oriented offensive coordinator Mike Martz who advocated an unrelenting aerial attack and potent ground game.

If anyone knows what they are talking about concerning Dak's INTs film breakdown, it's Mike Martz. For anyone to dispute that is simply being disingenuous. That poster in question is simply trolling.

 

[America's Cowboy]

No doubt. Biggest troll on the forum. Put him on ignore a few years ago when he arrived. I probably have about 10 others like that. Their drivel disappears.

Agreed.

It's a shame @CowboyRoy has me on ignore. I certainly don't fall in with those uneducated trolls. Roy simply can't handle some difference of opinion concerning our Oline. Oh, well...what a shame.

 

[noshame]

What have we got like sixty days?

 

[CowboyFrog]

How did leading the NFL in INTS while missing 5 games hurt the offense?

This is exactly what people here are talking about, instead of discussing the threads data or opinion you bring the same Dak point you bring to every thread including non Dak threads..why is it so hard for you to just discuss what the post is about? If you dont agree wioth the opinion or can disprove the facts presented then do so, why do you need to make sure this gets into every thread on the board?

 

[JohnBoy]

Injuries are injuries, I really don't think Dak can be "blamed" for the one he suffered last season.

Interceptions however: some portion of that blame can be put on the results of poor play-calling, situational football. Dak deserves *some* of that blame, for sure. But not all of it, for sure. If your scheme is putting the offense in 3rd-and-long situations too often, you will for darn sure start to see more aggressive pass attempts to move the chains, and this will indeed lead to more INTs.

It's not a mystery, and it's not complicated: football is more "team-sport" than any other team sport. What the o-line is doing, what the receivers are doing, what the running game is doing, and even what your defense is doing - all affects QB performance. As does the QB himself, of course.

 

[5Stars]

Agreed.

It's a shame @CowboyRoy has me on ignore. I certainly don't fall in with those uneducated trolls. Roy simply can't handle some difference of opinion concerning our Oline. Oh, well...what a shame.

He has you on ignore also? Me too. That is a sign of weakness because he can't handle an opinion other than his. You make me mad at times but I would never put you on ignore, I just ignore you. lol

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Here. Learn some football, and shut it with the uneducated nonsense already. You sound extremely ignorant.

Insults are not allowed........be nice and polite but then again your frustrations of having to find excuses for your man crush every year is wearing down on you it seems.

 

[America's Cowboy]

He has you on ignore also? Me too. That is a sign of weakness because he can't handle an opinion other than his. You make me mad at times but I would never put you on ignore, I just ignore you. lol

lol

So true brother on both points. It's a shame because @CowboyRoy is actually a pretty good poster and knowledgeable about the game. It's a shame he can't handle a difference of opinion. Oh well. Hope someone sends him some screenshots of our recent posts, and hope he takes us off ignore. He's fun to debate with once in a while.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Insults are not allowed........be nice and polite but then again your frustrations of having to find excuses for your man crush every year is wearing down on you it seems.

Where is the insult? You guys simply don't like to be called out on your trollish BS. At least I base my opinions with facts. Can't say the same about you guys.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Injuries are injuries, I really don't think Dak can be "blamed" for the one he suffered last season.

Interceptions however: some portion of that blame can be put on the results of poor play-calling, situational football. Dak deserves *some* of that blame, for sure. But not all of it, for sure. If your scheme is putting the offense in 3rd-and-long situations too often, you will for darn sure start to see more aggressive pass attempts to move the chains, and this will indeed lead to more INTs.

It's not a mystery, and it's not complicated: football is more "team-sport" than any other team sport. What the o-line is doing, what the receivers are doing, what the running game is doing, and even what your defense is doing - all affects QB performance. As does the QB himself, of course.

 

[Typhus]

Your not understanding.

1. Elliott sucks, who cares how many carries he can handle?
2. Another, better RB or 2 could have shared the carries with Pollard.

Bring them in, wear em out and repeat the cycle.
No more 2nd contracts for RBs, why is this so hard to understand for the masses.

 

[TwistedL0g1k]

Perhaps some of the interceptions were due to bad play calling- but that's a slippery slope from an analytical perspective. Even the best play caller in the league is going to have a bad play call from time to time. Bad play calls have to be weighed against good ones. Hindsight is always 20/20.

There's also a lot about a given play that fans simply don't know. What were the reads? What were the options? Was there a mistake made in route running or timing by the QB? Lots of unknowns.

 

[CWR]

The video proves you wrong, yet you keep trolling every Dak thread while spewing the same vile lies. Yeah, you're deliberately breaking forum rules, AND YOU KNOW IT!!!

Hes a trash poster and not worth engaging. I blocked him not because he has a different opinion, but he is overly redundant and rarely backs up anything. Occasionally I'll view ignored posts, and it's always the same. Lol

 

[CowboyRoy]

Bring them in, wear em out and repeat the cycle.
No more 2nd contracts for RBs, why is this so hard to understand for the masses.

Agreed. I would NOT have paid Pollard. Although the one year deal is doable.

 

[Typhus]

Agreed. I would NOT have paid Pollard. Although the one year deal is doable.

We can eat it because we have to.
Instead of investing in 4th pick overall RBs with contracts trying to reflect draft slot, many RBs could have been taken during Zekes tenure, at a fraction of the cost vs cap.
Might have already had our 1 tech like we have been desperately seeking Susan.
It's just really easy to find RBs every year in the draft, and the FA Rolodex verifies it.

 

[CowboyFrog]

We can eat it because we have to.
Instead of investing in 4th pick overall RBs with contracts trying to reflect draft slot, many RBs could have been taken during Zekes tenure, at a fraction of the cost vs cap.
Might have already had our 1 tech like we have been desperately seeking Susan.
It's just really easy to find RBs every year in the draft, and the FA Rolodex verifies it.

100% the diference between a stud DL/OL and a 6th round one is a much diferent gap than you find at RB's..its proven every year.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Its hard to imagine anyone being THAT football dumb. But they are all out there. MOST dont understand the game in detail.

the thing is they are bored. they are trolls. they are not here to discuss football, they are here to be TMZ trolls. they even admit to it.
they are more entertainment for the slow summer months. to be ignored as most do when real games start.
one thing for sure, all of them disappear when we win, but given we are not going undefeated, then they show up after losses and thumping their chest. its hilarious.