TheDude
McLovin
- Messages
- 12,203
- Reaction score
- 10,677
In our injury code, he is getting his groin amputated. We never catch a break.
Should improve his singing voice
In our injury code, he is getting his groin amputated. We never catch a break.
Two can play that game, bubba.
Due to age, some of these posters will keep around any jag just to hype up the potential that they usually don't have. They think young means potential and that is not always true. They believe in fairy tales.LOL.
So let me get this straight.
If the Cowboys brought in a veteran DE or two and they outplayed a guy like Russell, it would be bad GMing to pick one of them, despite being better, over Russell?
So essentially we shouldn't have looked to
improved the DE position because we need to protect and guarantee a roster spot on the 53 for Russell, who we aren't even sure is a good DE.
LOL.
So let me get this straight.
If the Cowboys brought in a veteran DE or two and they outplayed a guy like Russell, it would be bad GMing to pick one of them, despite being better, over Russell?
So essentially we shouldn't have looked to
improved the DE position because we need to protect and guarantee a roster spot on the 53 for Russell, who we aren't even sure is a good DE.
SB contender, us? You need serious help. Wow.
You said and I quote "a great gm picks the best DEs for the PRESENT TEAM" if you have a 36 year old pass rusher who is a little bit better than a 23 year old pass rusher do you think a great gm is gonna keep the old man since he is better for the PRESENT TEAM? Lol yep great GM right there
Because I don't concede defeat? Or because I believe an improved offense from a team that won 12 games is capable of a better run in post season with one or two better players on defense?
If so, then keep your loser mentality, I'll keep my expectations high thanks.
Same could be said about old vets also.Due to age, some of these posters will keep around any jag just to hype up the potential that they usually don't have. They think young means potential and that is not always true. They believe in fairy tales.
But he had 8 sacks LAST year in 11 games.How is WANTING to keep Russell over Freeney a loser mentality? You don't have any evidence Freeney is gonna make us a so called SB contender.
How is WANTING to keep Russell over Freeney a loser mentality? You don't have any evidence Freeney is gonna make us a so called SB contender.
But he had 8 sacks LAST year in 11 games.
Because Freeney can actually sack the QB. Russell can't even get in same zip code of a QB. This is not speculation, it is fact.
So where is the SB, if Freeney is the vital difference to being a SB contender. Did Arizona contend for the SB last year? I want that fact, not your speculation.
Freeney may have not have been the vital difference on an excellent defensive team, but he could be the vital difference on a mediocre defense with an elite offense. And AZ was contending for SB last season.
No they didn't. They didn't contend. Contender's are the ONES who actually have a chance to win it. One game to do it, period. The NFC Champion vs the AFC Champion. Carolina contended last year, but lost to the Broncos.
Even as a part time player, Dwight Freeney was a better pass rusher than anyone on this team in the last 2-3 years.You said and I quote "a great gm picks the best DEs for the PRESENT TEAM" if you have a 36 year old pass rusher who is a little bit better than a 23 year old pass rusher do you think a great gm is gonna keep the old man since he is better for the PRESENT TEAM? Lol yep great GM right there
Losers don't get to decide what constitutes a winner.