And what game changing plays did it do, did Arizona go to a SB to contend?
Is this really the lame angle you are going to go with here? Because Dwight Freeney wasn't the best pass rusher in football, he really didn't help the Cards all that much?
Let's be honest here. What's at play is the fact that some of you are just front office apologists. You just are.
There was no downside to adding Freeney.
For one, it would have cost you nothing. His contract with Atlanta is cheap and they can cut him for no real penalty. So there goes one excuse you guys used out the window - can't sign vets to big money, bad contracts.
Two, the goal is to get as good a pass rush as you can. So, yeah, if Freeney comes in and has 8-10 sacks in 16 games, he'd likely be our best pass rusher. Are you really going to claim right now that if Freeney got 9 sacks in 16 games and Lawrence got 8-10 himself, that it wouldn't help the team? Are you really going to sit there and try to claim that?
Three, Freeney is said to be a good leader and when you are banking on guys like Gregory and Mayowa as the future, having a good guy like Freeney around to work with them is just an added bonus.
Four, the more DEs you have, the more likely you can withstand an injury. Right now, the team simply cannot withstand injuries to DEs or they are going to have to hit the bargain bin like they did a couple of years ago when DL started falling left and right. The Cowboys took a reactionary approach to that. They had a chance to be proactive here and chose not to be.
But LOL at trying to argue we couldn't have taken on Freeney because we have to protect Russell's spot on the roster. Russell. As if he's the next great DE in football.