Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,744
- Reaction score
- 39,293
So if Dak is a Scrub, who is responsible for being all in paying him 40 million a season ?Dak shouldn't be the franchise quarterback of the Cowboys at any price. He simply isn't the answer. Cooper Rush might not be either, but he proved that he is, at the least, better than Dak.
Rush has shown that he is more skilled at the position than Dak.
But for what the Cowboys paid for Dak they could have gotten a real quarterback.
Instead, they paid Dak like he was already an established champion. He isn't.
He has a history of beating weak teams, but choking in games against contenders. EVERY TIME Dak has had the opportunity to prove he is more than just a scrub, he has failed. EVERY time he needed to be the spark that took the Cowboys to a higher level, he failed. But they paid him and saddled the Cowboys with that huge contract, despite him never earning it.
He is still just a scrub with a strong arm. But Dak doesn't make the Cowboys better.
That is the issue.
And after all of these years appear willing to extend him again. What does this say about our ownership.
Or is this more of a league wide issue or problem over paying and strapping Salary Caps for Non-Elite Franchise QB’s?