Is the Vikings Home record really that great?

8-0 is 8-0 in my book. I mean, yeah, some of the victories were less than impressive, but still. They won each and every home game they were given.

With that said, I think this is a case of them having "not" lost at home as opposed to "can't" being beat at home. They're undoubtedly better at home than on the road, but I don't see them as unbeatable by any means.
 
Daudr;3227294 said:
You are crazy if you think the Ravens don't scare offensive coordinators. Their defense is playing like they did during the Super Bowl run a few years ago, and they have a great running game. Their QB sucks, but they've won before with that formula.
I don't think they've played at a level they used to, they were on their A game against an over confident and wounded New England team but i wouldn't think of the Ravens in a superior sense anymore, you can hang 30 on them if you have to.
 
RainMan;3228189 said:
8-0 is 8-0 in my book. I mean, yeah, some of the victories were less than impressive, but still. They won each and every home game they were given.

With that said, I think this is a case of them having "not" lost at home as opposed to "can't" being beat at home. They're undoubtedly better at home than on the road, but I don't see them as unbeatable by any means.
They won the games, that's what counts, they did prove less than stellar at times to so both truths can be taken into account.

Thus the game must be played.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,942
Messages
13,906,284
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top