Not really sure what you want me to do here. Your answers are kinda just smirky little contradictions that don't really have a point.
Do as you please. I wouldn't say my responses are simply contradictions. There are some questions and each counterpoint is based in fact and/or my own opinions.
Its pretty clear your just bent on arguing whatever point I bring up just to do it.
You think I'm being disingenuous? I'm not. Just bored on a Sunday.
Case and point....…..Moore. The kid was a backup in the NFL for a few years, was never that good. Has no experience in coaching. Now that is all we have to go on, as you pointed out, how can we know if he is good or not. So based on those parameters I would like someone with much more experience guiding our young franchise QB. And how the hell do these coaches know he can coach before they hired him? Seems like a ho hum, lets let him grow, he may have potential type hire. Seems short sighted to me. Another friends of the family hire.
I said earlier I'm not sure how you evaluate him. You've basically said he's a rookie coach so you don't like him. You proclaimed him the worst QB coach in the league. I was merely digging for a reason behind that assertion. It appears you were being hyperbolic because you can't seem to point to an actual practical deficiency. Being a new coach doesn't mean he's a
bad coach. Not being a good player also doesn't preclude being a good coach, hence my reference to the saying, "Those who can't do, teach." Sorry if you thought it meant I was defending him. Just trying to figure out why you dislike him so.
Yet you cant tell me anything you like about him so your just taking the opposite stance to argue. Im really not interested in that.
Not sure I was arguing
against what you said, just asking you why you said it. Now that you gave reasons, I'm telling you why I think they're unconvincing.
And as far as Dak you asked me "what do you like best", so I told you. Then you turned around and pretended those were the ONLY things I liked.
I thought I simply responded to what you listed. If there's more you like, by all means, share it.
You appear to NOT think coaching is important. If that is the case, then we are in complete disagreement. We see the Cowboys get out coached a lot.
Coaching matters. Talent matters more. I just don't understand why you think Garrett and co. are so bad. Dak wasn't a top prospect and was essentially a 5th round pick. He's had an historic start to his career yet you seem to think it's all in spite of the coaching. I would argue the coaches have done an excellent job with a QB who is limited by NFL standards.
Dak was NOT a pocket passer in college. He was a kid that if something clear wasn't available in the passing game, he could just take off and run and do whatever he wanted. So it should be no surprise what so ever that he needs to work on that now that he is in the NFL. But some fans are just uneducated and they don't understand that. I would actually say that his pocket game has improved. He was even having good success later in the year even when there was pressure.
I agree, he has definitely improved. I hope it continues. I'm not surprised he needs to work on those things so not sure what that referenced. I've always preferred a pocket QB, myself. Not sure we'll ever see a QB who
needs to run play at a championship level.
But as I said above, coaching has helped him to be this successful. If the coaching critiques were true, he must truly be one of the all time greats to have such an efficient and successful start in spite of such awful coaches. I doubt anyone is bold enough to go that far with their evaluation of his play.
Staubach relayed a story about how Landry hated his scrambling. Basically said it meant he wasn't seeing the field and getting the ball to the appropriate read on time. Landry knew most pass plays have concepts within them to beat different types of coverages if the QB makes the right read of the defense. It's why the all time greats are generally pocket passers who make the right reads. No need to leave the pocket if you're on your game. Dak could get there if he continues to improve, but I think it's foolish to encourage him to scramble/run moreso than develop his game inside the pocket.
Btw- I prefer conversation to simply argument. I talk to people with opposing views because it usually creates a back and forth and we can bounce our opinions off each other. It's not about winning a debate, just getting a look at the other side of the issue. If you're not enjoying it, you don't have to reply. I'm basically a critic of critics.