News: It is official! Zeke suspended 6 games **merged**

Status
Not open for further replies.

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
He had me going until that one

and the part about working with Harvey is a bit much

my guy at the liquor store we have a case a habeas corpus and a fifth of bs

Whatever. Humor -- the last refuge of the ignorant.

Not BSing -- I worked with Harvey at Patterson Belknap. He came there from a firm called Porzio in NJ. Actually met him when he came to speak to our class at Columbia Law School (he is an alum too -- I graduated in '96). And he is one of the best African American lawyers of his generation. Look it up.
 

ActualCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,416
Reaction score
9,498
You can not like it but it isn't contrived nor a conspiracy. The NFL looked at facts and drew conclusions. There is nothing surprising nor unusual about that.
You were basically saying the same thing before they released their "evidence". And what you call evidence requires that you take the word of someone who:

1) Listed her occupation as sex slave
2) Asked a friend to lie on her behalf
3) Sent pictures of abuse instead of calling the police
4) Yelled about wanting to harm Zeke's career
5) Only decided to call the police over her made up accusations

The victim is the only evidence and you didn't even need it to form your opinion.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,527
Reaction score
27,825
Dude, an "exceptional case" is a legal term of art, and does not have the same meaning as it does in everyday life.

So it is not a question of "deduction". It is a question of knowledge.

You said that it could not be that exceptional meant that there could exceptions because exceptional meant that it was outside the rules. That is a deduction, chachi.

If something is outside the rules then it is an exception to the rules, chachi.

Still waiting for your examples of the CBA subsuming the issue of fundamental fairness. I think you are full of ****.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,533
Reaction score
6,145
No. Never done any work for the league, never worked at firm that represented them.

Think about it -- if I were on the inside, or were close to someone who was, do you think I'd be blabbing on a message board about the league's legal position?
I think that you are blabbing on a Cowboys message board with comical legal pretentious because you are a Giants fan. You were summarily embarrassed a number of months ago on this forum and now you have returned to make a fool of yourself again.
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
Think what you want. I honestly have no idea what you mean there. Enjoy thinking you are right. Doesn't make it so. Peace.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,370
Reaction score
94,448
I think that you are blabbing on a Cowboys message board with comical legal pretentious because you are a Giants fan. You were summarily embarrassed a number of months on this forum and now you have returned to make a fool of yourself again.

What happened months ago?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,527
Reaction score
27,825
In this context (i.e., whether it triggers the policy or not), absolutely, Read the Article 46 of the CBA. Read the Brady case. And then repent.

We obviously have read the CBA; @bkight13 was the one quoting it not you.

I read the Brady case as well and brought up fundamental fairness which you have no real response to.

You're just trolling now.

Put me down for not believing that this account is an actual attorney.
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
I think that you are blabbing on a Cowboys message board with comical legal pretentious because you are a Giants fan. You were summarily embarrassed a number of months ago on this forum and now you have returned to make a fool of yourself again.

Um, nope. You are entitled to your opinions (including any about me). But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Don't believe me? I dare you to show my analysis to any Cowboys fan and attorney you respect, and see what they say.
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
read the ray rice decision.....NFL got waxed on that one

Man, you just don't know when to stop.

First, that was an arbitration, not a court case.

Second, in that particular case -- largely due to the uproar that his minor discipline caused when the video subsequently came out -- Goodell voluntarily gave up his right to serve as arbitrator, and former Judge Barbara Jones was appointed.

That hasn't ever happened before or since, didn't happen in the Brady case, and won't happen here.
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
We obviously have read the CBA; @bkight13 was the one quoting it not you.

I read the Brady case as well and brought up fundamental fairness which you have no real response to.

You're just trolling now.

Put me down for not believing that this account is an actual attorney.

I believe that you read it. I also believe you misunderstand it.

Thinking I am not an attorney does not make that the case, I'm afraid,

Again, peace.
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,608
Reaction score
5,001
So Zeke's attorneys actually responded to the league office's question regarding her bruises with "maybe she fell down the stairs" and "she's a waitress, so maybe she bumped into some tables."

Did 10-year-olds prepare them for this meeting?
Better question is how would you explain the bruises that you claim you have no knowledge of?
 

beacamdim

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
585
He postured as an "objective" Cowboys fan and was outed as a clinical Giants fan, garden variety sociopathic stuff.

As they say, just because a witness is a prostitute doesn't mean their eyes don't work.

What you think about me is irrelevant. It can't possibly change the law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top