THEHEREAFTER
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- 6,301
redster;1769783 said:In a few years, he's gonna be a top 5 quarterback, guaranteed.
chinch;1769799 said:thanks for the laugh
you said top 5.redster;1769802 said:Well, you can laugh all you want, but Jason Campbell looks like he is going to be good.
boo hoo. i compared him to a couple of white stiffs pretending to be QBs if that helpsredster;1769802 said:Oh, and some of you need to stop comparing him to Quincy Carter just because he is black. Why must a black QB be compared to a black QB? A QB is a QB regardless of his skin color.
redster;1769802 said:Well, you can laugh all you want, but Jason Campbell looks like he is going to be good. He also works real hard.
redster;1769802 said:Well, you can laugh all you want, but Jason Campbell looks like he is going to be good. He also works real hard. Oh, and some of you need to stop comparing him to Quincy Carter just because he is black. Why must a black QB be compared to a black QB? A QB is a QB regardless of his skin color.
firehawk350;1769755 said:Take it for what it's worth, but he compares favorably (in his first 16 games) to Alex Smith, Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler and Eli Manning. He's not an immediate success a la Romo or Anderson but he can develop into a solid QB.
Hostile;1769707 said:Personally, I really like the kid. I think they way overpaid for him. There was no need to move into the 1st round to take him. Too high a price for a player with question marks.
He's fairly mobile, but doesn't have the 6th sense that someone is coming. Holds the ball in a way that he can be stripped. Is much better at checkdowns than primary reads. I think he's a bit afraid of primary reads because of INTs last year. That can be a mental roadblock.
Has a nice arm with decent touch on the ball. Needs work on his accuracy though, especially if he is moving. He tends to sail the ball high when he's going forward and throws it into the ground when going back.
Seems like a good kid with a future in this league. I don't know if he will ever be an elite QB, but I do think he can be valuable to them.
He has improved except for going to the WRs in the hot zones. I think he got burned last year and is tentative this year. He has to overcome that before he can take a step up.kevin11;1769742 said:Hostile, even know your a boys fan, you seem to know your football. A cowboy fan that can think. Just kidding around.
I mostly agree with what your saying. His accuracy has improved from last year, though. 53% to 58 or 59% is improving pretty well, IMO. Yes, Campbell is not putting up romo numbers, but who actually does?
Aikman, Peyton and others start out slow and end up becoming HOF guys.
Campbell will be a decent, good QB in the league for a while.
I actually think that's a great thing. I do not like rainbows. They come floating down and allow the defense to close the gap.YoMick;1769827 said:I would add that he throws his deep ball too flat. Not enough air under it. No rainbow to it. Its literally hit or miss with his WR's when he throws deep... no room for error
Hostile;1769829 said:He has improved except for going to the WRs in the hot zones. I think he got burned last year and is tentative this year. He has to overcome that before he can take a step up.
I think it's unwaise to mention him in the same vein as Aikman or Peyton. I don't really see him as a star QB, though I think he can definitely be a decent one. Those guys had star written all over them from the word go.
Par that I like him? I don't like every QB, so not sure what you mean by par.firehawk350;1769755 said:Par for the course.
I disagree with this. I think he gets caught from behind far more than from a direct line to him.I disagree, he seems to be decently intuitive on feeling the pressure but I think he has a problem with making plays once he is on the move. He can usually run relatively well, but seems to have problems reading the field when he's on the move.
This is entirely possible. A coach can be the one calling tentative just as easily as a player can play that way. Regardless of the source, for him to take the next step he has to hit WRs in the hot zones. Too easy to defense someone who is 1 dimensional.I think his checkdown-ness is a direct result of Gibbs. Gibbs has allowed for no murkiness over turning the ball over. I know that's what Gibbs wants, but when Campbell was given free reins on the offense (last week it seems to be the first time he was given this, running no-huddles and calling plays at the LOS), he looked much more effective.
All QBs do this to an extent. Where they get burned is if they miss open reads because of it.A problem I noticed is he tends to find a single guy to go to and then consistently feeds him the ball. That guy is usually never the same from one week (or even half) to another, but I'd like to see more distribution, as opposed to 2 straight passes to Cooley, then a pass to El, then 2 passes to Cooley...
I like the flatter deep balls as I stated before. If he develops chemistry. Sometimes guys just can't click.I haven't noticed that personally, but I'll keep an eye on it. His deep balls (as pointed out a thousand times before) are too flat though. Once he develops chemistry with Moss and learns to put a little air under it, he's looking like a completely different QB.
Which is pretty much what I said. He's a decent QB, but not an elite one. I do think Cutler can separate himself from that group. He has tools the others don't. Namely a go for it attitude and a gun to do it. The others all play vanilla.Take it for what it's worth, but he compares favorably (in his first 16 games) to Alex Smith, Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler and Eli Manning. He's not an immediate success a la Romo or Anderson but he can develop into a solid QB.
Also, based on the scheme we are running now, we aren't looking for a great QB (assuming with stick with the Saunders scheme for a while). Trent Green was never a spectacular QB, just a very solid one. We run a scheme that (when we actually decide to run it) doesn't require a 350 yard game from a QB to work well.
Romo's an anamoly. It happens now and then, but you can't predict it. Brady and Warner are examples. But sometimes it's a combination of timing and place. I think Brady can play anywhere and be great. Not so sure Warner can claim that and it's too soon to say Romo could, though I like his intangibles.kevin11;1769839 said:wow, you miss read my post, pretty bad.
I mean that even the best of the best did not start throwing for 4,000 yards and making the probowl like a Tony romo.
Hostile;1769843 said:Romo's an anamoly. It happens now and then, but you can't predict it. Brady and Warner are examples. But sometimes it's a combination of timing and place. I think Brady can play anywhere and be great. Not so sure Warner can claim that and it's too soon to say Romo could, though I like his intangibles.
Some can. Most can't. Very few just seem to turn on a switch one day and get it. It takes development.kevin11;1769851 said:At least you admit this.
Most fans would say all great QBs come out and play at a HOF lvl right from the get-go.
Maybe not most fans...