See that's a strawman. I certainly do not have a problem where the team is headed from a personnel standpoint. Now certainly, there are some here who think he's a doofus of a coach and should have been fired. But I suspect a majority think just like me............ enough of the excuse making, enough of the OJT chatter, enough of trying to cover up for on the field issues by giving Garrett credit for remaking the roster. He's got a team that should not only do well in the regular season but also make some noise in the playoffs. If he can't in the next season or two, we have a problem.
The team could very well be building a high quality, SB caliber roster while still having average coaching.
It's not a strawman at all. It's simply the facts. The team is obviously getting better, and some people want to believe its happening in spite of the coaching and not because of it.
There's no excuse making going on. I'm not making excuses. I'm saying 'look at the results. You have nothing to complain about regarding the coaching.' Every team has 'on the field issues.' Coaches aren't perfect, and there are going to be mistakes on a certain low percentage of snaps over 7 years. That's thousands of calls. Of course some are better than others, and of course some are just plain bad.
The OJT chatter is coming from dissatisfied fans, not the other way around. The roster *has* been remade. He's got a team that not only should do well in the regular season but also make some noise in the playoffs...because he's built that team. Yes, it needs to keep winning. That's the whole point of building it in the first place. And if it doesn't keep building then the staff will get replaced. That's life in the NFL.
But, no, it's not an average coaching staff. If you're looking at a team that's performing in the top quartile over a rebuilding phase which is now a legitimate contender for a championship where we were not before, you can't reasonably call that an 'average' job. That's above-average performance.